To be technical and unromantic, religions, including Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, Marxism-Leninism, etc., are families of memes.
A meme is a "mind virus" in a non-pejorative sense. Ideas subject to darwinian pressure to reproduce themselves.
Memes sometimes hurt their hosts (in the cause of reproducing themselves).
Memes sometimes help their hosts (in the cause of reproducing themselves).
On a long time frame, pressure tends to (weakly) select for the latter. This is why novel viruses are dangerous, but become less so over time.
It's often true that societies & individuals can reap benefits from embracing an old meme (gimme that old-time religion).
But old-time religions aren't magic panaceas, and their real purpose isn't to help you or your society anyway, it's to (broken record here) reproduce themselves.
New media environments (inter alia) often cause a shake-up in the meme ecology, just like changes in "real" environments shake up "real" ecologies.
The printing press and the Protestant Reformation & printing press.
The internet and the "Great Awokening" (graph from @ZachG932).
The big meme families (Christianity, Islam, Buddhism, etc.) have been around for a long time, I think we should expect them to survive in the new media environment.
Some variants will not need to change much to survive: living fossils.
Some will adapt until they're arguably a whole new family. Dinosaurs into birds. Moldbug's progressivism-as-Calvinism thesis.
Some of these new and old memes will have beneficial, symbiotic relationships with their hosts. Some will be dangerous parasites.
All of these memes have, at the end of the day, interests distinct from yours. They're aren't hurt to help or hurt you, that's incidental.
There's no "one true meme" coming here to deliver us from human nature and zero-sum games.
Incidentally, none of this is incompatible with believing in that a particular meme actually happens to contain truth.
You can believe Jesus actually is the Son of God (I do) or Mohammed is the Prophet of Allah and still recognize the mechanisms described above.
@m18233749, relates to our discussion the other day
@lapislingua, as this corner of Twitter's most prominent Calvinist, seems fair to tag you👋
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Excellent film. Doesn't leave you overflowing with love for humanity. The orca calf capture and the depiction of the sleeping pens are particularly hard to watch.
I also noticed lots of parallels between the captive whales and modern life.
•The whales in captivity are violent with each other, in part because they live in Frankenstein pods mixing whales from (in a former trainer's words) different "languages, cultures, genes."
Parallel: Obvious. We can see that this is cruelty with whales, why not with people?
•The captive whales have health problems and live shorter lives. Meanwhile, the owners claim that the captive whales have it good because they're getting medical care (which the whales appear to dread).
@blacknihilism engages with others kindly, and I always leave my interactions with him knowing I've dealt with someone who wants to grow as a person and to help others grow. Feels good, man.
10/10, would recommend as a mutual.
@deseret_brat has good takes on police, and stuck by them in the face of pressure. Also, good use of humor and her handle always makes me think of desserts.
I agree with much of this video from @AuronMacintyre. His basic position is anti-anti-LARP.
But his argument depends on a very rosy definition of LARPing, and overlooks a key part of what it means to criticize something as a "LARP."
The common ground:
•"Crabs in the bucket" is real. People often make themselves feel better by making others feel worse.
•Don't make perfect the enemy of good.
•Don't tear someone down as a hypocrite for trying to better themselves and stumbling or outright failing.
The key point he overlooks:
"LARP" implies fantasy. Fantasies often end up harming their believers. They're unachievable, so failure is the only option and they blind you to more attainable goods.