1. Police excel at recording themselves as victims of hate but give themselves a pass when the boot’s on the other foot. ‘We investigated ourselves and our motives were found to be pure’ says @leicspolice in relation to its riot shield investigation.
2. Despite notching up 120,000 NCHIs against individual members of the public for saying stuff like ‘My cat is a Methodist’ or whistling Bob The Builder, @leicspolice have decided the rules do not apply to them.
3. That’s odd. Because @CollegeofPolice guidance insists that the police do NOT check for motive and must believe the perception of the victim. Hence @HarryTheOwl101 and @SVPhillimore both have NCHIs attached to their names for 6 years, with no possibility of appeal.
4. At The Court of Appeal in March, the QC for the police argued that an NCHI recorded against an individual should restrict their ability to gain employment. By becoming a police officer, for example.
5. Convenient, then, that @leicspolice have circumvented this restriction by NOT following the rules which they so readily apply to the rest of us. Another word beginning with C is Corruption.
6. One last thing: @leicspolice do not take any notice of responses to their Twitter feed because the public tends to express the wrong opinion. @threadreaderapp unroll.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with WeAreFairCop

WeAreFairCop Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @WeAreFairCop

9 Sep
1. Had a call from @leicspolice yesterday re the riot shield. Where to start? So, our complaint was recorded as a Non Crime Hate Incident (NCHI) on the basis that I perceived the shield as hateful. So far so good.
2. However, the NCHI was not recorded against an officer’s name… which is in contrast to the standard practice of labelling a person as ‘suspect’ & ruining their job prospects for the next 6 years. Convenient.
3. The reason for this is as follows: the police judge their own actions to be pure and hate free. Political colours on a riot shield are an act of solidarity and support - not an act of antagonism and hostility. So they are free to continue with the deployment.
Read 7 tweets
10 Jun
At a webinar about hate crime in Scotland! Now listening to a 'tactical hate crime adviser' from Glasgow who is talking about role of police Scotland.
Interestingly and worrying, they are going to talk about impact of hate crime on CHILDREN. And urge all questions to be 'respectful'. This is an emotive topic which you may find upsetting.
Learning objectives - for attendees to define a hate crime, to name the protected characteristics and identify different types of crime that can be motivated by prejudice and guide you through the hate crime form.
Read 41 tweets
20 May
As @MerseyPolice are warning us not to be transphobic whilst refusing to tell us what transphobia is, it falls on us to provide the working definition, kindly offered by @stonewalluk
Note: if you deny the existence of ‘gender identity’, you automatically fall foul of @MerseyPolice. If you consider sex to be binary then you automatically fall foul of the police.
What’s more, if you say nice things about Dame Jenni Murray or JK Rowling you are in danger of being recorded as a transphobe by @MerseyPolice.
Read 7 tweets
18 May
Truly excellent report from Essex University, confirming and apologising for its failures to uphold freedom of speech on campus. Thanks @CultSwat

essex.ac.uk/-/media/docume… ImageImageImage
Very good to see this. Image
And this. Dare we hope the adults are back in the room? Image
Read 7 tweets
15 Apr
Allegation 1 @NYorksPolice - Your officers have tweeted support of the exclusion of Gender Critical women, contrary to Para 9 Schedule 2 Reg 5 of the Police Conduct Regs 2020 (Discreditable Conduct)
Allegation 2 - In so tweeting, your officers are in breach of Para 2 Schedule 2 Reg 5 of the Police Conduct Regs 2020 in that this fails to show respect and courtesy to those members of the public who hold gender critical views.

@threadreaderapp unroll
Allegation 3 - Failure to immediately remove this tweet will amount to a breach of Para 10 Schedule 2 Reg 5 of the Police Conduct Regs 2020, in that you are required to take action against officers failing to uphold the required standards of professional behaviour.
Read 4 tweets
6 Apr
Let’s remind ourselves of the Derbyshire policing threats, which I assume are pretty typical for most forces.

Odd isn’t it. ‘Someone was mean to me because they mistakenly thought I was disabled’ doesn’t make the Top Ten.
Let's have a look at some of the statistics for actual disabled people, rather than people who are mistakenly identified as disabled.
The unemployment rate for disabled people was 8.4% in the latest quarter, compared to 4.6% for those without disabilities.
42.6% of those with disabilities were economically inactive in the latest quarter, compared to 15.3% of those without disabilities.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(