1/ It is hard to understand how some people reason. You raise very specific issues about CBC and someone responds by saying how they like it and how we should give it a chance. Why not address the issues raised?
2/ Some people think that CBC is just a different content delivery methodology. CBC is an entire system of education which is very different from 8-4-4 and which is totally inappropriate for our current economic realities.
3/ Most of the people praising CBC are doing so out of ignorance. They have not read the foundational documents for the system. They do not understand its proposals on career progression for their children. This is irresponsible parenting.
4/ How many of these people will accept the verdict that their children career pathway has been determined as Repairing Bodabodas or Hairdressing and that their children's formal academic education basically ends at 14 year?
5/ How many will accept when their children are declared unfit to learn mathematics, sciences and languages beyond 14 years? How many people do you know who didn't go past standard eight & are able to fluently speak and write English or Swahili (forget native Swahili speakers)?
6/ It is simplistic to reduce this debate into one of whether CBC is bad or good or whether you like it or not or whether it is better than 8-4-4 or not. This is not what the debate is about. The debate is about very specific irredeemable flaws in the system.
7/ If the curriculum reforms were being done properly these are the issues that should have been debated exhaustively prior to CBC rollout.
8/ We are now in a messy situation where the implementation and the public participation are happening at the same time. This will end up in chaos and tears.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ Those saying Mount Kenya should get 40% positions in the next government should get their heads examined. What have 35 years at the presidency helped us? Do government positions benefit the tribe or the individuals and their cronies?
2/ What we need are leaders who can deliver for the whole country. If the whole country benefits Mt Kenya will benefit as well. There are no challenges unique to Mt Kenya that can only be solved by someone from the religion.
3/ If the energy Minister is from Mt Kenya it doesn't mean we will be buying fuel at a cheaper price than other Kenyans. If the agriculture minister is from Mt Kenya our tea will not sell at a higher price than that from other places.
I have read the document on which CBC is based. There're lots of issues on that document that bother me. These include; 1. It assumes that there was no education system in Kenya before CBC. Instead of building on what was there it imposes a system straight from another country
2. It ignores all the realities that exist in Kenya and assumes that what has worked elsewhere will work here. The countries quoted in the document such as Germany, Malaysia, Finland, Sweden, India have different economic and cultural realities #CBCmustfall
3. It assumes that all the infrastructure, manpower and materials to run CBC exist in the country which is not correct #CBCmustfall
When people talk of infrastructure as an economic enabler they need to understand that this can only be so if the said infrastructure is based on clear economic objectives.
2/11
It should also be built at competitive prices and should be sustainably financed.
Look at some of the projects Tanzania is doing. These projects make a lot of economic sense and have been done at very fair cost. They have also been locally funded.
3/11 #EphraimNjegaQuotes