2./ Whether they're straight or gay doesn't matter. The fact they question strange, newly fashionable and rigidly enforced notions erasing the reality of being a woman gets them labelled bigots when they're only doing what every woman politician should do...speak up for women.
3./ In the two years since @ALLIANCELGB was founded more and more gay people have made it clear the extremists, the grifters, and the self-serving blowhards who claim to speak in our name are in fact tarnishing our reputations, turning a once-bullied minority into the bullies.
4./ Women are 51% of the population. And even if they weren't the status of their rights (so recently won in a blink of an eye in historical terms) would mean they deserve better than being TOLD how their rights must now bend and shift to fit others who openly threaten them.
5./ Many gay peeps -like the public- struggle to make sense of the trans rights debate. But the least any LGB or trans person should do is make clear they believe profoundly Rosie, Joanna, Kemi, and Helen have a right to speak and a right to be heard. #IstandwithRosieDuffield
6./ It's bonkers to take on half the population who'll be horrified when Gender Self-ID's problems become obvious. But it's for our own good too we need to put clear water between us and the liars, the thugs and bullies who took over our movement and misuse our name.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1./ 🧵In 2001 David Paulden changed his name to Zack Polanski. In my latest article I question the reasons for the choice and suggest his new name signalled contempt for his biological family, a tangled attitude towards his Jewish identity and the birth of his Messiah complex.
2./ Polanski claims his new surname pays homage to his ancestors. Yet he offers wildly contradictory accounts of their lives and has shown no interest in finding out the truth. Stranger still was his decision to change his first name to that of this fictional 8 year old boy . 👇
3./ Zacharias (Zach) Wrench is a character from 'Goodnight Mister Tom' a children's book the LGBTQ+ lobby adores because it celebrates the 'chosen family' over the biological equivalent. Zach forms an intense relationship with a broken and troubled boy called William.👇
1./ 🧵The story of Lord Ahmed reveals startling similarities between Muslim activism and the trans lobby. Both play the victim, make hyperbolic claims about hate crime and refuse to take abuse seriously. Ahmed is a serial offender yet hobnobs with the Muslim elite. 👉
1/of 17
2./ Earlier this month the Sunday Times revealed Ahmed played a starring role at a high-profile event for Pakistani-Brits where he sat alongside a Labour MP. It didn't seem to matter Ahmed had been jailed twice; once for buggering an 11 year old boy. thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…
3./ Afzal Khan MP is a champion of Islamophobia Awareness Month. Perhaps if he spent less time with a convicted sex offender there would be less "Islamophobia". As for Ahmed, he perfectly illustrates how Muslim agitators use allegations of bigotry to try to deflect criticism.
1./ Labour's Pakistani Problem. The Times reports a Labour MP took part in an event with convicted child abuser Lord Ahmed. Why is this such political dynamite? Ahmed was the first Pakistani councillor in Rotherham; infamous for its 'grooming' gangs
1of/11 thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…
2./ In 2022 Ahmed was convicted of raping an 11 year old boy and an under age girl. The fact Ahmed was a teenager at the time (in the 1970s) helped reduce his sentence on appeal. But here's the thing: Ahmed had accomplices when he raped these two kids. 👉 bbc.co.uk/news/uk-englan…
3./ Ahmed's two older brothers were "deemed unfit to stand trial" (conveniently) yet the jury made clear it believed they'd also taken part in what were effectively gang rapes. Can it be any wonder Pakistani politicians in Rotherham refused to take 'grooming' gangs seriously?
1./ 🧵 Why did the SNP ignore the crimes of Jordan Linden who has been convicted of sex offences against young men and boys? In my latest article I dissect the culture of a party that led gay predators to believe they had a free pass.
Click on link in my bio to read.👆
1/of 7.
2./ After gay marriage was passed the SNP was so desperate to convince gay men the party was their natural home its culture changed. Soon it began to resemble that of a sleazy gay bar, complete with innuendo, boozing and misogynist drag queens performing at SNP events.
3./ After Derek Mackay was fired for harassing a 16 year old boy it was revealed Nicola Sturgeon had banned him from drinking at Conference. When drunk he tended to grope men. Shame she didn't stop him going on school visits which is how he met that 16 year old boy.
1./ 🧵My latest article explores the scientists Jeffrey Epstein gathered around himself including Stephen Hawking and Lawrence Krauss. I also reveal new discoveries about the bizarre event that has come to define Epstein's misuse of science to launder his reputation.👉
1/of11
2./ In March 2006, 22 top physicists flew into the US Virgin Islands to discuss the mysteries of the Universe. This was fortuitous for Epstein. A year before Florida cops had begun investigating him. 3 weeks before the boffins arrived he was indicted for rape of a 14 year old.
3./ Cecile de Jongh, the Epstein Foundation's Director insisted the conference would have a focus on education. Physicists would visit high schools and schoolkids were invited to the opening reception. Cecile happened to be the wife of the Governor of the US Virgin Islands. 🤔
1./ Trans Propaganda. In 2020 @guardian applauded "a moving new documentary" about Jess Ting, a "trans surgery" pioneer. The film was made with money donated by the world's most notorious paedophile, Jeffrey Epstein. He'd also donated to Ting's clinic. theguardian.com/film/2020/nov/…
2./ In emails biologist Robert Trivers sold "trans surgery" to Epstein as a way to realise a porn fantasy of sucking a penis attached to a woman's body. "It would be much nicer if the organism is female, then you get the best of both worlds." Surgery that Ting specialised in.
3./ The Guardian was not to know Epstein was funding Ting but they could have asked some questions instead of uncritically raving about the film's "poignant, deeply emotional scenes of relief and excitement" in which the surgeon mutilated mentally deluded young people.