Why is Texas electricity both unreliable and expensive?
Let me tell you about some new research by my grad student, Jangho Lee.
A 🧵:
Using historical data we got from @ERCOT_ISO's web page, we developed a statistical model of electricity demand as a function of temperature and an inferred long-term trend of non-climate factors (e.g., population).
If we plug historical temperatures (ERA5) into the statistical model, we can reproduce almost exactly the historical power usage. This plot shows a comparison of seasonal maximum power:
So now we can take a climate model ensemble (the CESM-LE) and estimate a probability distribution of power demand for winter and summer 2021. To do this, we take temperatures from 2016-2025 in the model, but use non-climate factors for 2021.
Here is the distribution of seasonal maximum power demand (the highest hourly power demand during the entire season) for summer 2021. The red bars are what we get using temperatures from the CESM-LE.
The black line on that plot is ERCOT's estimate of maximum available power, 87 GW. We see that demand can get very close to max supply. More quantitatively, there is a 20% chance that demand will be within 7 GW of maximum supply.
At first blush, this might look OK — after all, in most cases, supply is sufficient to satisfy demand.
So if everything goes right, then ERCOT can supply power during the hottest summer days and most of the coldest winter days.
But there's no margin if everything doesn't go right. If a few power plants go offline unexpectedly, you're faced with a power shortage.
Put simply: there is zero margin for error on the ERCOT grid.
Note that we could alleviate that if we connected the ERCOT grid to the rest of the US. With such connections, we could just wheel in some power from other states if supply gets tight.
But, according to Rick Perry, we would rather have power blackouts.
I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that Rick does not speak for the majority of Texans on this issue.
There are a few things worth emphasizing here. The market was designed with no incentives for there to be any excess capacity in the market because excess capacity costs money and the designers of the market wanted to save consumers money.
But as supply and demand converge, the price of electricity on the ERCOT market shoots up. As is well documented, during the winter storm the price of electricity was 100 times the normal price.
Shortages in power are therefore tremendously costly for the general public. We will literally be paying the costs of the one-week 2021 winter storm for decades. @TexasMonthly texasmonthly.com/news-politics/…
More generally, the deregulated Texas energy market is costs consumers money [although there are many reasons for this]. wsj.com/articles/texas…
So, when Texas deregulated their energy market, they produced an electricity market with higher prices and less reliability.
In case you’re wondering why 2 feet of sea level rise over the coming century matters, it’s because it turns a 2–4 foot storm surge into a 4–6 foot storm surge. That will increase the damage exponentially.
Sea-level rise impacts are non-linear so that going from. 3 ft storm surge to a 5 ft storm surge could increase the damage by orders of magnitude. It depends on local thresholds.
Ugh. Either Pielke is an idiot or he's intentionally misreading what I said. The data support both hypotheses, so I won't speculate on which is correct.
What I'm saying is this: if you add 2 ft of SLR to a 2-4 foot storm surge, you get the damage of a 4-6 ft storm surge.
Climate change has gotten me thinking about the Drake equation and the future of humanity ...
What is the Drake equation, you ask? A 🧵:
The Drake equation is an example of order-of-magnitude estimation. There's some quantity you want to know (in this case, how many intelligent civilizations there are that Earth can communicate with), so you break it down into the terms that would constrain the value.
About 2/3rds of global warming comes not from direct heating by CO2, but from feedbacks. The most powerful feedback is water vapor. As CO2 warms the climate, the mass of water vapor in the atmosphere increases. WV is itself a greenhouse gas, so this creates more warming.
This process, known as the water vapor feedback, can double the warming you get from CO2 alone. As such, it is one of the most important processes in the climate system.
It has long been speculated, and recently been well documented, that relative humidity (RH; the amount of water vapor in the air relative to saturation) in our atmosphere remains relatively fixed as the climate warms.
One of the great mis-directions form climate deniers is to focus on *deaths* in a disaster. Obviously, deaths are important. But in the rich world, natural disasters don't kill very many people.
For example, Ida's death toll is (right now) less than 10, which is amazing considering how intense of a storm it was.
But while people survived, the damage and suffering is extreme.
In case you're wondering how well it's going in Texas with no mask mandate in schools, here's @CSISD's number of COVID cases for 2020-21 school year (in blue) compared to the first two weeks of 2021-22 school year (in red).
This is a still from this video. In it, the spokesperson says they'll keep the school open for as long as they can, but at some point so many teachers/administrators are sick that they'll have to shut down.
.@GovAbbott says he's relying on "personal responsibility". But at what point does keeping the schools open become more important than letting people make their own decisions?