It’s a solid start.
Of a Jewish holiday or a future tort suit? Image
More sukkah up, still no personal injuries.
Massive assumption of risk.
Much unreasonability. Image
Chag Sameach!
Still no injuries, other than a splinter! Image
Less wall, less s’chach for Sukkot Covid
More flowers, more air, more sky.
Apparently string can make these walls kosher?
Chag sameach, y’all. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jed Shugerman

Jed Shugerman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jedshug

15 Sep
Biden's vaccine mandate is a good policy, but Congress needs to legislate it, rather than rely on agency regulation.
My research into 18th-century "vesting" suggests valid reasons for SCOTUS to revive the non-delegation doctrine.
1/ New @StanLRev draft:
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
2/ Let's start with "vesting" & the unitary executive theory, which is where I started.
Unitary theorists assume the word "vest" had special legal meaning (exclusive & indefeasible).
My research shows that the word "vest" had only a general simple meaning of granting power.
3/ E.g., Richard Epstein in his 2020 book:
“The use of the term ‘vested’ brings back images of vested rights in the law of property; that is, rights that are fully clothed and protected, which means, at the very least, that they cannot be undone by ordinary legislative action...
Read 8 tweets
2 Sep
Confirmation.
The Supreme Court effectively overturned Roe v. Wade by a 5-4 vote last night. Roberts in dissent.

It's not the Roberts Court. It's the Shadow Court.

They didn't even have the decency to schedule a case and pretend to hear arguments.
It's all shadows & cowardice.
Texas strategically avoids judicial review by giving enforcement to private parties.
Sotomayor:
"Texas has deputized the State’s citizens as bounty hunters, offering them cash prizes for civilly prosecuting their neighbors’ medical procedures."
"By relying instead on citizen bounty hunters, Texas sought to make it more complicated for federal courts to enjoin the Act on a statewide basis.
A breathtaking act of defiance—of the Constitution, of this Court’s precedents, and of the rights of women."
Read 5 tweets
27 Aug
Who was the best romantic empiricist?
Robin S?
Robyn?
Read 4 tweets
10 Aug
The Atlanta Hawks have an Israeli player named M. Heidegger.
He is a phenom. He can really husserl and turn a corner. He plays kierke-guard.
I hope they dasein some plays for him.
I guess you had to be there.
Maybe he can play for the Manhattan College Jaspers.

Just throwing this around and letting you know of the existence of these bad jokes, @BlakeProf @jdmortenson @GVildostegui @JonCohenNYC
gojaspers.com
Breaking: The Temple Owls have signed George Willie Fred Hegel.
cc: @BlakeProf
Read 4 tweets
2 Aug
Why didn't Jefferson or Madison simply fire Marbury?
"The Marbury Problem & the Madison Solutions"

My recent @FordhamLRev essay building on research by @Jane_C_Manners @LevMenand, adding evidence from Madison & the 1st Congress vs. the unitary exec @SSRN
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cf…
2/ Daniel Birk, Manners & Menand saw a problem for the unitary theory in Marbury.
Marshall wrote: "[W]hen the officer is not removable at the will of the executive, the appointment is not revocable, and cannot be annulled. It has conferred legal
rights which cannot be resumed..."
Marbury (CJ Marshall) cont.:
"The discretion of the executive is to be exercised until the appointment has been made. But having once made the appointment, his power over the office is terminated in all cases, where, by law, the officer is not removable by him."
Why not?
Read 17 tweets
28 Jul
Capital Delegation at the Founding:
Scholars @nicholas_bagley @jdmortenson & Nick Parrillo have found broad delegation by Congress to executive officials in the Founding Era.
I stumbled on another example:
The Residence Act, the 1790 statute creating the District of Columbia 1/
2/ The 1790 statute is here. And it is very short.
It was one of the most contentious debates of the first Congress, and it became part of the famous deal between Jefferson/Madison and Hamilton over assumption of state debt ("The Room Where It Happened").
www2.gwu.edu/~ffcp/exhibit/…
3/ The statute delegated power to a commission of 3 who "shall under the direction of the President survey, and by proper metes and bounds define and limit a district of territory, under the limitations above mentioned."
Those limitations?
Only this 70-mile span of the Potomac!
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(