Thread by @plaforscience

After proving Spain's 5th wave is a Human Artifact, dependent on test, positivity analysis remains a little puzzling.

1st, there's a gross Manipulation, as repeated test to known positives ARE COUNTED.

Real positivity (CASES/test) is lower than official

https://twitter.com/plaforscience/status/1437550273539579905?s=19

Officially aired positivity is ~130% of that really obtained from the data, 1st graph

We were told a max positivity over 16%, when cases/test was only ~12%, at 2nd graph

Now we're almost at false positivity rates.

But there's more analysis to do.

During this 5th wave, we've observed cases came directly from testing: it implied no independent relevant fluctuations in true prevalence

If we compare positivity and test number, we see a STRONG unexplainable correlation.

Doing the linear regression for the relation between number of test performed and positivity we found a R2=0.91
No "wave" alterations, but perfect linear dependence.

It appears that the more test you make, the more positivity you get.

Expect a miraculous capacity of the political decision to EXACTLY foresee the incoming positivity, including its increase/decrease rate and date of peaking, and I mean exactly; the only rationale is that making more test is creating fake positivity.

With the very low prevalence of basal phase, a plausible mechanism for that is, thru very high Ct PCR, finding OLD infection chains.

We can't discard pure notification artifacts, as the previously explained multiple counting for positivity radiated test to a same case.

5th wave is COMPLETELY proved to be a Human Artifact:
Cases & IncidenceRate are directly&exclusively related to test performed
So is positivity
Deaths are overcounted by any PCR+ without limit to how old they are

A politically decided fake wave
Will u keep living ruled by lies?