New Blog Post now live:
psychologytoday.com/us/blog/rabble…
A small or even infinitesimal (<1%) level of acts of discrimination can produce substantial experiences of discrimination among targeted groups.
Implications for policy and discourse excerpts to the right.
1/3
Blog partially inspired by Twonversations and even Twisputes with
@SincerelyData
@joelwatsonfish
@SciSocialProbs
2/3
Of course, this is only 1200+/- word blog, and this IS Twitter (@NewLiberalsPod has been all over this lately), so I pre-emptively denounce myself for not addressing ALL THE OTHER EVILS IN THE WORLD
Work by @wil_da_beast630 figures bigly in some of the general perspective. Also of possible interest to:
@PamelaParesky @SkepticReview89 @CJFerguson1111 @CalvinKLai @psforscher @minzlicht @yorl @awilson_WLU

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Dark Pirate Jussim

The Dark Pirate Jussim Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @PsychRabble

20 Sep
Thread III: My Psych Today Blogs debunking histrionic academic rhetoric&claims about race/sex/ethnic bias, stereotypes & prejudice, including but not restricted to stereotype threat, microaggressions&implicit bias.
Just Posted
psychologytoday.com/us/blog/rabble…
The Discrimination Paradox ImageImage
This discovery is what began my exposure to how bad political biases in academia really are. The data are overwhelming.
psychologytoday.com/us/blog/rabble…
I could go on. Oh, wait, I did.
psychologytoday.com/us/blog/rabble… Image
Read 14 tweets
20 Sep
Thread II: My Psych Today blogs on political bias and lack of intellectual/political diversity in academia.
This connects directly to Thread I, on the social psych of censorship.
psychologytoday.com/us/blog/rabble…
Back in the day, I had *some* hope of changing the hyperpartisanship massive political skew and bias in academia. Silly me.
psychologytoday.com/us/blog/rabble…
When I thought highlighting a problem might inspire solutions. Silly me.
psychologytoday.com/us/blog/rabble…
Read 10 tweets
20 Sep
THREAD I: My Psych Today Posts Related to the Social Psych of Censorship and Intellectual Intolerance
(this means denunciations, demonization, and attempts to sanction people for their ideas, not just "criticize" them).
psychologytoday.com/us/node/115920…
Read 13 tweets
19 Sep
First New Orwelexicon Entries in Months
Thread!
Orwelexicon here:
psychrabble.medium.com/an-orwelexicon…
Framework Psychosis! From a blog from 2008! Gem uncovered by @VBaker111
Full blog here:
specgram.com/CLV.2/03.pill.… Image
Hard of Thinking. H.O.T.
Originator: @0knaomi Image
Read 13 tweets
16 Sep
Shall we "follow the science"? A short thread of sources on Things That Do Not Work* to Increase Social Justice:
Trigger Warnings
Diversity Trainings
Implicit Bias Trainings.
*=Tests of their effectiveness fail to show any.
1/n
Trigger Warnings Do Not Work.
and likely cause more harm than they prevent (which is not hard, because they prevent hardly any harm).
Diversity Trainings Do Not Work I

(Note: Only showing images of the papers, most can be easily found using Google Scholar).
Read 9 tweets
7 Sep
New post just promoted to Essential Read under Replication Crisis at Psych Today***:
psychologytoday.com/us/blog/rabble…
***They either censor/edit my stuff or love it. More love than censorship, so I can't complain too much.

BUT: 1/2
If you click the image, under key points, it says this:
"An experimental manipulation in the study altered many dependent variables, making it unclear if the results are due to mindset differences."
That is NOT me, an editor added it. It is AMUSINGLY wrong.
(need 1 more tw)
2/3
AND I CANNOT REVISE IT. (email to editorial staff is out). A manip that altered many DV's would be good. BUT its wrong. The experimental conditions manipulated a ton of things all at once, making it hard to attribute results to mindset (or anything else).
Read post for details.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(