Worth noting that the UK 'experts' talking up 'long-term impacts of vaccines' in adolescents have 0 real experience with vaccine-associated myocarditis vs experts in most other countries- all of whom have come to the conclusion that COVID-19 is *much* more of a risk than vaccines
Please follow reliable experts who have studied this far more than members of JCVI who're busy quote-tweeting anti-vaxx groups like UFT & promoting vaccine hesitancy.
Here are some:
@PeterHotez @KatharineSmart @muirtheimhne
And unlike JCVI which *still* has not published it's assumptions for the numbers provided, other countries, and researchers have done the analysis with transparent, published models that can be run and replicated by anyone.
Here's the CDC model:

cdc.gov/vaccines/acip/…

And here's @PeterHotez paper in Circulation:
ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/CI…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Deepti Gurdasani

Deepti Gurdasani Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @dgurdasani1

21 Sep
Miriam Cates, at today's Westminster Hall debate on vaccinating children 'paying tribute to UsForThem', a lobby group that's has consistently spread misinformation & lobbied against mitigations in schools and vaccinations for kids. How much influence does this grp have on govt?🧵
This should worry us all. #HARTlogs reveal UFT looking for 'expert witnesses' to pressure the MHRA to not approve vaccines for kids. One of their signatories has discussed 'seeding the idea that vaccines cause COVID-19'. This is dangerous. Yet, this group has been quoted by MPs.
This group sent a pre-action letter to Gavin Williamson last year, pressuring DfE to open schools without mitigations in Sept, despite SAGE warning government about the devastating impacts of this on the pandemic. We all know what happened after.
Read 8 tweets
21 Sep
It's incredibly painful listening to people talking about 'toxicity on both sides of the debate' or 'scientific disagreements that are undermining pubic trust' when my experience on this platform is largely being bullied by, not 'disagreed' with on evidence by other scientists.🧵
Most people I challenge on the evidence don't respond to me on arguments I make at all. They attack me personally with sarcastic or snide remarks or subtweets - almost never clear and evidenced arguments. They never accept or acknowledge errors. This is not 'academic debate'.
This 'both siding' creates a sense of false equivalence between scientists who are being subjected to coordinated bullying just putting out well-evidenced information and those who are either putting out damaging misinformation in a pandemic, and/or bullying other scientists.
Read 9 tweets
20 Sep
Important point here- given JCVI has said the benefits of vaccinating 'healthy' adolescents was 'marginal'. We've had ~9000 hospitalisations with COVID-19 in children so far. These docs show 80% of hosp were directly *due to* COVID-19 with the *majority* in 'healthy' children.
There have been 3,400 COVID-19 hospitalisations in under 18s since 4th June, when MHRA authorised Pfizer for adolescents- 1700 of these have been in 6-17 yr olds. Based on recent docs, the majority of these would've been in 'healthy children'.
Of course we didn't even offer vaccines to children with 'pre-existing conditions, who JCVI say have 50x the risk of ICU admission until 19th July, *6 weeks later*. How many were preventable had we started vaccinating all kids earlier? And who is accountable for these delays?
Read 5 tweets
20 Sep
Myth busting thread on naturally immunity from infection in children. One of the arguments used some, including members of JCVI have been high exposure in kids, which means 1 dose may be adequate. The evidence actually suggest poor neutralisation in kids & rapid waning of Abs 🧵
First, many people don't seroconvert after infection, and with young people this proportion can be even higher. This means that they may not have detectable Abs after infection. Ab levels generally do correlate with protection, so absent antibodies are problematic.
Of course, we cannot rule out T cell responses in these children, but in the absence of clear evidence showing these are present, we cannot assume this, as some appear to have done.
Read 15 tweets
19 Sep
The last few days have revealed connections UsForThem have with HART & with prominent media hosts. They've threatened govt with legal action to remove masks from schools & have explored action against the MHRA on vaccination, with a member of JCVI recently quote-tweeting them!
The question is how much influence UFT have had on policy through the backdoor? There are clearly UFT sympathisers within govt. How has a so-called parent group had such reach across the media, been able to threaten legal action against entities to remove protections for kids?
Who are they, really? And who funds them? The HART logs show UFT signatories actively trying to promote anti-vaxx messaging (e.g. 'vaccines cause covid'), and even hoping that vaccines cause serious side effects (ADE) so they can promote negative messaging on these.
Read 17 tweets
18 Sep
Where to start with the evidence? Would suggest reading these excellent pieces by @NafeezAhmed
But I guess you probably know all this, given you've been working with them for while? And platforming them.

bylinetimes.com/2021/03/30/gav…

bylinetimes.com/2021/04/01/dis…
I'm sure many others would be keen to show Julia evidence of the above... please do feel free to add here... I'll start with this:

Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(