One of the more interesting kinds of US parochialism is the refusal to accept that other cultures detest wokeness — and recognize it as the next iteration of American imperialism.

Here's Macron himself from last October:
wsj.com/articles/emman…
@DanielLarison is antiwar, so he should understand why this is a meme — and why the global pushback against Woke America will only grow from here on out.
Others across the political spectrum have also noticed this is old wine in new bottles.

Here's John Gray by way of @tylercowen: "Wokery is the successor ideology of neo-conservatism, a singularly American world-view." bloomberg.com/opinion/articl…
How can we prove that wokeness is the successor to neo-conservatism?

Well, now that the CIA and military justify their existence in the patois of an Oberlin undergraduate, the obvious next step after invasions-for-democracy is bombing-the-problematic.
independent.co.uk/news/world/ame…
Of course, few things are monocausal. Macron has also been looking for ways to "divorce America" & achieve "strategic autonomy".

This is the broader context. Do you really pull the US ambassador over a sub deal, even a big one? Was it that casually done?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Balaji Srinivasan

Balaji Srinivasan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @balajis

21 Sep
Sometimes people genuinely oppose a policy, but often they just distrust the people implementing it.
This gives at least four choices:

1) Abandonment: stop pursuing the policy
2) Coercion: force distrusters to obey, boosting their distrust
3) Subsidiarity: find someone the distrusters trust to implement the policy
4) Cryptoification: reduce the need for trust in the first place
Discourse today mostly focuses on (1) and (2). Should the policy be junked, or should it be forced through?

However, in theory you could use some combination of (3) web-of-trust and (4) trust-minimizing computation to attain consensus around at least a subset of policy problems.
Read 8 tweets
20 Sep
Expect more calls to break up from across the political spectrum. Here's one:
Here's another, from a different ideological position:
This article from 2018 predicts the use of interstate compacts...
archive.is/Dh3fW
Read 5 tweets
19 Sep
Imagine an NBA game where players imagine they're playing for the same team, but only see their own points. That's how ideological movements work on social media today: only individual profiles, no team dashboards.

DAOs change this. Number go up means movement goes up.
DAOs are also a potential resolution to the long-running argument over whether corporations only have a fiduciary duty to their shareholders — or if they should be run by the "community", which in practice usually means the state.

But what if it didn't?
A third way between (a) a small group of possibly societally-disaligned shareholders and (b) de facto nationalization by a dirigiste state is (c) many DAO coinholders with governance rights related to their skin-in-the-game.
Read 4 tweets
18 Sep
Meanwhile, Iran has just been admitted as a full member of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, a sort of China-centric version of NATO and the EU.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shanghai_…
"The SCO is probably the biggest international organization that you’ve never heard of, and that’s likely because the West is being expressly excluded. However, the SCO is increasingly influential and is set to only become more well-known in the West." speri.dept.shef.ac.uk/2017/09/03/the…
The oddest thing about SCO is the membership list, as many others have observed. India is in there, alongside Pakistan, in a "security" alliance, and admitted on the same day. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shanghai_…
Read 4 tweets
18 Sep
Why did France take the dramatic step of recalling its ambassadors to the US and Australia?

One thesis is that Macron has wanted to break free of American wokeness for a while. And this gives him the diplomatic casus belli to do so.
Remember when media corporations reported[1] the beheading of Samuel Paty as a "police shooting", if they reported it at all?

France remembers[2].
[1] archive.is/fiXH3
[2] archive.is/pFw0G
Germany also isn't happy with the US for threatening sanctions over their pipeline deal with Russia, then backing down, then doing some sanctions after all in a symbolic-but-annoying way. It shows petulance rather than strength.

And Germany and France are the core of the EU.
Read 7 tweets
17 Sep
The AUKUS alliance resulted in losing support from France, America's oldest ally.
The future of the world may be a decentralized West and a centralized East.
Western nations are scattering like pinballs while ostensibly uniting vs China.

- UK now moves independently of the EU
- France is now mad at Australia and the US
- New Zealand actively refuses to join AUKUS
- NATO + EU absent

Meanwhile, Asia observes quizzically.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(