One of the more interesting kinds of US parochialism is the refusal to accept that other cultures detest wokeness — and recognize it as the next iteration of American imperialism.
@DanielLarison is antiwar, so he should understand why this is a meme — and why the global pushback against Woke America will only grow from here on out.
Others across the political spectrum have also noticed this is old wine in new bottles.
How can we prove that wokeness is the successor to neo-conservatism?
Well, now that the CIA and military justify their existence in the patois of an Oberlin undergraduate, the obvious next step after invasions-for-democracy is bombing-the-problematic. independent.co.uk/news/world/ame…
Of course, few things are monocausal. Macron has also been looking for ways to "divorce America" & achieve "strategic autonomy".
This is the broader context. Do you really pull the US ambassador over a sub deal, even a big one? Was it that casually done?
Sometimes people genuinely oppose a policy, but often they just distrust the people implementing it.
This gives at least four choices:
1) Abandonment: stop pursuing the policy 2) Coercion: force distrusters to obey, boosting their distrust 3) Subsidiarity: find someone the distrusters trust to implement the policy 4) Cryptoification: reduce the need for trust in the first place
Discourse today mostly focuses on (1) and (2). Should the policy be junked, or should it be forced through?
However, in theory you could use some combination of (3) web-of-trust and (4) trust-minimizing computation to attain consensus around at least a subset of policy problems.
Imagine an NBA game where players imagine they're playing for the same team, but only see their own points. That's how ideological movements work on social media today: only individual profiles, no team dashboards.
DAOs change this. Number go up means movement goes up.
DAOs are also a potential resolution to the long-running argument over whether corporations only have a fiduciary duty to their shareholders — or if they should be run by the "community", which in practice usually means the state.
A third way between (a) a small group of possibly societally-disaligned shareholders and (b) de facto nationalization by a dirigiste state is (c) many DAO coinholders with governance rights related to their skin-in-the-game.
Meanwhile, Iran has just been admitted as a full member of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, a sort of China-centric version of NATO and the EU. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shanghai_…
"The SCO is probably the biggest international organization that you’ve never heard of, and that’s likely because the West is being expressly excluded. However, the SCO is increasingly influential and is set to only become more well-known in the West." speri.dept.shef.ac.uk/2017/09/03/the…
The oddest thing about SCO is the membership list, as many others have observed. India is in there, alongside Pakistan, in a "security" alliance, and admitted on the same day. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shanghai_…
Germany also isn't happy with the US for threatening sanctions over their pipeline deal with Russia, then backing down, then doing some sanctions after all in a symbolic-but-annoying way. It shows petulance rather than strength.