Over the high holidays I heard a teaching that helped with a section of Torah I've always found troubling - the that God visits the guilt of the parents upon the children, upon the third and fourth generations. This repeats several times in the Torah.
It's softened a bit by what follows: "but showing kindness to the thousandth generation of those who love me and keep my commandments".
But it still seems pretty harsh. What kind of God would punish children for the wrongs their parents did? And aren't we told elsewhere God *doesn't* do that?
The rabbis interpret these verses in several ways that do address the seeming contradiction, and aligning it with the characterization that accompanies these verses in every instance of a merciful and just God.
In general, the sages say that the 'punishment of the iniquity of the parents' is only visited unto the 3rd and 4th generation *if they continue* in the same iniquities.
Sforno says that God waits to pass judgement on the initial doers of iniquity until 3 or 4 generations have passed, and waits to punish until it is clear whether the iniquity will continue for so long.
Chizkuni says that the punishment for the worst sins would be too much for one generation to bear, and so God shows mercy by spreading out the punishment over several generations so that none are overburdened.
These explanations make sense, but they still always left me feeling uneasy. What I received recently was this: This isn't God laying down rules. This is God telling us a hard truth. Intergenerational trauma is real.
Neither our parents nor our children are isolated, as much as we may wish they were. And maybe that can help us forgive our parents, where they need forgiveness, and be careful with our children, who need us to break cycles.
And that idea put me in mind of @TheRaDR 's teachings about intergenerational trauma in the story of the patriarchs and matriarchs, and how exactly that fits with the repeated phrasing about generations.
To expand:
"an impassioned God, visiting the guilt of the parents upon the children, upon the third and upon the fourth generations" (Ex. 20:5). With whom are we dealing here? With Terach, and the generations of his descendants.
We learn in a Midrash (sefaria.org/Bereishit_Rabb…) that Terach was a maker and seller of idols. The language about visiting iniquity on the 3rd and 4th generation is always in relation to idol worship. Avram, even before God tells himself to get himself going, rejects idolatry.
Terach's reaction is to give his son to Nimrod, who attempts to prove him wrong by sacrificing him in a fire. I think we can agree that this is some pretty abusive and traumatizing parenting - and it doesn't stop there.
The attempted sacrificing is done in front of Abram's family. His brother, Haran, silently decides that he will wait and see what happens to Abram and then align himself with whichever God seems strongest to save himself.
When Abram is miraculously saved, Nimrod asks Haran which gods he follows and Haran replies "with Abram's". Nimrod then casts him in the fire and Haran is not saved - he burns to death in front of his father and brother.
Pretty traumatizing. And this trauma persists for generations - three or four of them. In each generation there is conflict between brothers, perpetuated by the preference of their father. Isaac and Ishmael, Jacob and Esav, Joseph and his brothers. "Three or four" generations.
And "showing kindness to the thousandth generation of those who love me" - with whom are we dealing here? With Ephraim and Menassah. It's Joseph, in the fourth generation of echoing trauma, who breaks the cycle by forgiving his brothers and welcoming them back to him.
His children, the fifth generation, are the first to have no inter-fraternal conflict. When Jacob, who stole his older brother's blessing, tries to correct Jacob on which son is the eldest, Jacob gently refuses. He blesses *both* of his grandsons.
And he extends this blessing for all of Israel, forever - 'for a thousand generations' - saying "By you shall Israel invoke blessings, saying: God make you like Ephraim and Manasseh" (Gen. 48:20).
It isn't *God* that is punishing the generations following Terach. It's Terach's own descendants, who are hurting their children in reaction to the ways they were hurt by their parents.
And it isn't *God* that breaks the cycle and changes the trauma to a blessing. It's Jacob and Joseph, who recognize the harm and decide to end it through kindness. Through loving God by keeping God's commandment - "you shall not hate your brother in your heart" (Lev. 19:17)
Well this is all mixed up. Should be "when Joseph tries to correct Jacob, who stole his older brother's blessing, on which son is the eldest..."

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Radical Traditional Jewish Person

Radical Traditional Jewish Person Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JustSayXtian

15 Sep
It isn't "by religion" if you're only comparing between denominations of one religion. This is egregious.
And look, this is from a public health study, not a religion study. If you're not *trying* to get a statistically significant sample of non-Christian religions then it's not surprising it problematic to not have a statistically significant sample. There aren't a lot of us.
But if that's the case it should be reflected in the visualization title and labels. Don't just pretend we don't exist.
Read 4 tweets
15 Sep
I would like to invite any Christians who feel like observing Yom Kippur to do so by reading Galatians and reflecting on how your own Bible is super explicit about how gentiles not only don't have to, but *should not* engage in Jewish observances.
Additional contextual material on what exactly Paul is talking about in that time and place:

In Hebrew 'circumcision' is called brit milah - literally "covenant of cutting". The rite of circumcision, in Judaism, is the rite of bringing someone into the Jewish covenant
When Paul is warning against circumcision for Christians, he is warning against signing the contract that says they are bound by The Law. The Law is literally the mitzvot - the set of practices and observances and behaviors that Jews follow.
Read 6 tweets
10 Sep
This is a popular exegetical take in progressive Judaism - I hold by it for sure - and a good example of both projecting contemporary socio-religious ideas backward AND grounding them in the actual text.
To start off, there's the examination of how it fits in the narrative. At first glance, it seems counter-intuitive, right? God flat out says "Because you have done this ... I will bestow my blessing upon you". Seems straightforward enough. But then what *happens*?
After the Akeidah, God never speaks to Abraham again. The story tells us that *Abraham* returned to his servants and *Abraham* stayed in Beer-Sheba. Not Abraham and Isaac - just Abraham.
Read 19 tweets
9 Sep
Just before Rosh Hashanah I was arguing with some Edgy Atheists about the Old-Testament-God-is-Mean thing, and one of them pulled out "What about the binding of Isaac?" - so, some post RH thoughts about the Akeidah, biblical originalism, and exegetical norms in Judaism:
The question posed to me by Edgy Atheist (I can't find the original tweet, because I'm blocked now) was - what do you think was originally supposed to be the moral of that story? And of course, EA's answer was "obey God no matter what, even if God says to murder your son, duh."
But the thing is, if we're talking about the *original intent* we can't do that in the context of *contemporary norms*. We have to consider what the societal norms were of the people who were hearing this story for the first time.
Read 21 tweets
6 Sep
The past several years I've spent the last bit of Elul getting frustrated and stuck, and then right before Rosh Hashanah something shifts and I think about the whole thing in a way I hadn't before.
This year I just thought - this period of atonement isn't just about asking God to forgive us. It's about us seeking to forgive God.
And maybe we don't deserve to be forgiven. Maybe God doesn't either. But we try to do it anyway, because that's what you do when you love someone and you don't want to be mad at them anymore.
Read 6 tweets
5 Sep
Progressive Christians, I'm gonna need y'all to reverse course on this crap right now. The people pushing regressive, theocratic laws are not doing it because they're too Jewish or too Muslim. They're doing it because they're *Christian* nationalists. Stop trying to avoid it.
It doesn't matter what you were *trying* to say, or that you were attempting to make some more nuanced point. What you are actually doing when you talk about "old testament God" or "the American Taliban" is associating the threat with minority religions and excusing Christianity.
You can't address the nationalist, theocratic wing of American Christianity by denying it's Christian foundations. If you want to attack it, attack the negative *Christian* interpretations.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(