The filibuster has been used in bad ways, and for Sen. Manchin to continue to use it is wrong.
Nothing was wrong with the For The People Act, which the late Rep. John Lewis actually wrote. We don’t need Manchin’s “Freedom to Vote Act.” Voting is a right, not a freedom.
Manchin is wrong to say that we’ve done enough and that the spending bill needs to be less than $3.5 trillion over 10 years. $3.5 trillion is already a compromise.
Manchin needs to stop playing games and hiding behind a coward’s filibuster. Poor and low-wealth people can’t afford for him to waste anymore time on games!
We’re saying to Sen. Manchin: It’s not too late for you to do the right thing!
But if you don’t choose the people over the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Koch Brothers and Exxon, we will engage in nonviolent moral direct action.
We’re saying to President Biden: It’s time for a moral reset!
We should not be arguing about numbers in a budget. We should be talking about what is in these bills and who will be lifted out of poverty if they are enacted — and who is being hurt every day they are delayed!
Rev. Dr. @LizTheo speaking now: Sen. Joe Manchin is blocking the very agenda that Democrats campaigned on in 2020 and allowed them to win majorities in the House, the Senate, and the White House.
.@LizTheo: Manchin is ignoring the urgency of now. He’s suggesting putting bandaids on deep, gaping social and economic wounds. His suggestion that we should wait and “pause” is anathema to us in the #PoorPeoplesCampaign. It’s unbiblical and unconstitutional.
Jean Evansmore with @WestVirginiaPPC speaking truth to Sen. Manchin: I think you don’t want Rep. John Lewis’s name on the voting rights bill. You want your name on the bill instead!
Young people are leaving West Virginia in large numbers, because jobs in the state do not pay enough for them to afford to stay there.
Pastor Lipscomb @WestVirginiaPPC is calling on Sen. Manchin to raise the federal minimum wage to a living wage of at least $15/hr.
Molly Linehan, a Catholic school teacher and member of the Catholic Committee of Appalachia, is calling on her fellow Catholic, Sen. Joe Manchin, to stop delaying and pass voting rights protections now!
What Manchin is doing is actually dangerous to the poor and low-income people in his state and across the country who are suffering each and every day!
Two senators, Manchin and Sinema, should not be able to block the entire agenda. We need the Black Caucus and the Progressive Caucus to #HoldTheLine and refuse to pass infrastructure without voting rights, living wages, etc.
Stand with the @WestVirginiaPPC now and call Sen. Joe Manchin and demand that he end the coward’s filibuster and vote for voting rights protections, living wages of at least $15/hr, infrastructure, spending, etc.
This is a sad moment in America. The issue is not who will back down, moderates or progressives? The question is: Do we truly love and care for the 140 million poor and low-wealth people in this country?
Do we care about workers who need living wages, the sick who need healthcare, the children who need education?
The first question should not be how much can we afford to spend? We have the money. We spent $21 trillion in war since 9/11.
The question is, how much do we care about promoting the general welfare of all people? How much do we care about the poor who are made poor by policy decisions? How much do we care about those from the mountains of Appalachia and the delta of Mississippi?
There’s no national voter ID requirement in the new Senate bill, but there’s a dangerous gateway to legitimizing existing voter ID laws in states.
Why is Manchin using Trumpian language in the “Freedom to Vote Act” to suggest voter ID is OK in order to “restore confidence,” which feeds the lie? Voter ID needs to be taken out.
We fought NC’s voter ID requirement in court and proved it was discriminatory to people of color, women, and the poor, both in intent and in impact. And it was unnecessary, because we already had signature attestation.
.@Sen_JoeManchin, There is no such thing as a "moderate" constitutional position. You didn’t swear to uphold the Constitution "moderately." And you aren’t moderate when it comes to taking corporate money. You are extreme and lavish.
And you aren’t "conservative," b/c you’re not trying to conserve voting rights, conserve the environment, etc. You’re quite liberal when it comes to tax cuts for corporations, when it comes to lying, when it comes to hurting the poor & low-wealth people in your state & nation.
Moderate/conservative Democrats simply means you say you are a Democrat in the primary and support the DNC platform to get elected, and once you are in office, you tell the corporations & greedy rich, "I’m for sale!"
If the revised voting rights bill is truly strong, truly what John Lewis would've wanted, truly what’s needed and not something Manchin has watered down & compromised away to please the US Chamber of Commerce and Republican extremists, then the full movement might support it. ...
But if it's not, those of us in movements that are free to speak the truth, along with seasoned civil rights leaders, voting rights lawyers, and religious leaders will expose it. The attacks in this moment are too real for us to just keep going through the motions.
When the details of the bill are read, we will find out if it was compromised down to weakness. There can be no moderate position on voting rights and equal protection under the law!
We know Manchin cares about corporations and the greedy rich more than the people. 84% of the COVID plan he voted for with no questions about its price tag went to corporations. But why is he so cautious now, considering the people so in need in his own state?
Is Manchin just the frontman for other corporate Dems who are convinced that only by being Republican-lite can they get elected? None of them who ran in 2020 said they would work against the DNC platform.
Black people, brown people, native people, women, poor and low-wealth people put them in office, and none of them in their primaries said, "If you elect me, I’ll block policies that would help you."
Today, September 11, 2021, marks 3,000 days since June 25, 2013, the day when the Supreme Court gutted the Voting Rights Act of 1965 by removing preclearance in the landmark case Shelby County v Holder.
The late Ruth Bader Ginsburg famously wrote in her dissent of that decision, “[T]hrowing out preclearance when it has worked and is continuing to work to stop discriminatory changes is like throwing away your umbrella in a rainstorm because you are not getting wet.”
Congress has had 3,000 days now to fix this and restore voting rights protections to millions of Americans, but it has yet to do anything. They don’t even seem to have any sense of urgency about doing it. The infrastructure of our democracy is crumbling and in need of repair!