do we think these are bona fide chik-fil-a sandwiches purchased saturday night, stored, & delivered sunday morning? or any other guesses (paid employee with a key will sneak in & make sandwiches sunday?)
i'm enjoying mschf's website, of course, including the graphics, assumption of risk including injury or death (helpful when you're serving day-old chicken w/o a food service license), waiver & release, & indemnifcation agreement.
if chik-fil-a chose to sue, it has precedents for its complaint. restaurants have recently sued delivery sites for TM infringement/unfair competition for using their TMs & offering delivery w/o their permission & delivering food in unrepresentative quality/condition.
MSCHF likes to argue, as it did in the nike/lilnasx #satanshoes case, that whatever it's selling isn't actually sneakers or chicken sandwiches but art or performance art. sunday chik-fil-a as expressive work.
we don't see a lot of (any?) first sale cases involving perishable food goods!

obviously chik-fil-a would argue that waivers aside, if you sell old chicken & call it "chik-fil-a" & someone ends up in the hospital, that's pretty egregiously tarnishing to their brand.

also, ew.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with alexandra j. roberts

alexandra j. roberts Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lexlanham

20 Sep
it's monday morning & i want to talk about pegging the patriarchy.

instagram.com/p/CTydOGiAqDK/
this is tricky territory for a few reasons (& not just the ones you might think). we're at the intersection of "avoid overpolicing trademark rights in expressive uses" & "use IP law to help small indie artists, often POC, profit off of their creative works."
supermodel & sexual wellness brand co-owner cara delevingne wore a dior power suit (umpire vest? buckle corset?) emblazoned in red with the words "peg the patriarchy" to the met gala, nailing the theme of "in america: a lexicon of fashion,” where millions saw & contemplated it.
Read 11 tweets
29 Mar
nike sues MSCHF over lil nas x "unauthorized satan shoe" for infringement, false designation of origin, & dilution (blurring & tarnishment); allegations of actual confusion backed by social media evidence

(i typed "nike satan" into the bloomberg search bar, so that's fun) ImageImageImage
i'll live-tweet the complaint @questauthority-style even though i am supposed to be grading.
right out the gate--in literally the 1st sentence--nike characterizes the shoes as "materially altered to prominently feature a satanic theme."

this is key to rejecting a 1st sale defense, which protects ability to resell genuine branded goods but not "materially altered" ones.
Read 40 tweets
5 Feb
why is hailey bieber calling her new beauty brand RHODES & not BIEBER BEAUTY as originally planned? well for one thing, @uspto found a likelihood of confusion with her husband's JUSTIN BIEBER line. i talked w/ @pagesix:

pagesix.com/2021/02/04/why…
hailey appended a consent & coexistence agreement to her office action response, which was supposed to indicate justin's consent to her brand name, belief it wouldn't cause confusion, & commitment to address any that arises-- but she forgot to get her husband to sign it. #oops
uspto also deemed "bieber" primarily merely a surname. hailey argued it was rare, wouldn't be perceived as a surname, and...umm, this.

"the 'bieber beauty' mark creates an aura. the mark evokes thoughts of a look, lifestyle, or image: in which mrs. bieber gracefully walks." wut
Read 5 tweets
21 Aug 20
the decision in the @TheJimCornette v. @StaySickGRAVER trademark & right of publicity lawsuit came out last month and it is a treat. big thanks to @ericgoldman for sending it my way. here's one of the shirts at issue (thread):
g-raver is a deathmatch wrestler; he wrestles others w/ "improvised weapons, e.g. light tubes, barbed wire, thumbtacks, panes of glass, & weed whackers...graver’s signature weapons are tattoo needles."

he did not bring any of those items to court to defend this suit afaik tho.
cornette is a wrestling commentator w/ 2 popular podcasts. the court calls him a "celebrity" w/ a "professional persona."

cases about the wrestling world are always fascinating b/c the parties are not exactly people but not purely fictional characters (see hulk hogan).
Read 14 tweets
9 Jul 20
a band called lady antebellum recently realized its name was racist & announced it would go by lady A instead. but another artist has performed as lady A for decades. today, the band sued. i'll try to explain the suit & break down some of the trademark issues in this thread.
1st let me say i agree w/ those calling out the band for its faux activism & hypocrisy. @thejournalista, @ira, @matthewacherry, @IWriteAllDay_ , & @yashar all have excellent threads on what's wrong w/ the band effectively silencing a black artist in the name of anti-racism.
i focus on the TM aspect to clarify the legal issues, not to defend the band's actions. in the end, the band may be legally well-situated but morally wrong. & painting themselves as victims is a particularly bad look. (see @pitchfork quotes: YIKES.)
Read 20 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(