I guess this gambit might work, but I think the Narcissist Caucus is failing to grasp that the mediocre infrastructure bill ain't the ACA; it means way more to them than anyone else, and especially if JM is signaling that he won't support any reconciliation bill House might walk
People who are confident that this is a bluff seem to think that everyone in the party is as invested in the BIPARTISAN infrastructure deal as Manchin/Sinema are, and I see no actual basis for that
And so in addition to the obvious problems with CREDIBILITY theory, the Manchin/Sinema/Gottheimer gang and the reporters egging them on don't seem to have figured out that this logic now cuts both ways
The good parts of the ACA were so important and likely to endure, and the opportunity so rare, that the right of the caucus has a LOT of leverage in the negotiations. That's just not the case with a mediocre one-off infrastructure bill
It's very 2021 that the Biden administration might get chop-blocked because Gottheimer is a complete clown falling for the transparent manipulations of Beltway hacks whose only interest is Dems In Disarray and/or Libs OWNED stories Image
Exactly. Not only is this an unusual case in which the "moderates" are more invested, they're the ones reneging on a carefully negotiated strategy and not being team players, and it's clear Pelosi is rather less impressed with them than Jake Sherman is
It would also be one thing if the "moderates" were asking for stuff they could credibly claim was unpopular to be taken out. Instead, they're asking for extremely popular things (most notably cheaper prescription drugs) to be taken out in favor of upper-class tax relief.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Scott Lemieux

Scott Lemieux Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @LemieuxLGM

21 Sep
"Centrists" making opposition to literally the most broadly popular item in Biden's agenda their hill to die on gives away multiple shows
"Defund the police is unpopular! Give us a winning issue!"
"Well, yes, that's why we want to run on reduced prescription prices in 2022."
"Not like that! I was thinking like a tax cut for rich professionals in Westchester County, that's how we win the heartland"
I still can't get over the fact that Biden's legislative agenda might die because a House rando let himself get baited by a reporter who was jonesing for a Dems In Disarray story
Read 5 tweets
21 Sep
The guy had a great story about a con artist sitting right there and instead turned out to be one of the marks newyorker.com/magazine/2008/…
BTW was able to watch most of the 86 Mets doc on a plane and it was EXCELLENT. I forget who made the point (Darling maybe?) but "Hernandez was the leader, Carter thought he was the leader" sums up The Kid (who I love RIP) perfectly
You have to be REALLY good and comitted to have been ultimately respected in that clubhouse while being an annoying tryhard, and Carter was every bit that good
Read 5 tweets
17 Sep
Venal “moderate” House Dems torpedoing Biden’s agenda lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2021/09/venal-…
It's worth noting here that the pharma lickspittles aren't even the most marginal. Peters won his last election by more than 20 points, Rice by 13. They can live without their money. They're killing the most popular part of Biden's agenda because they can -- that's it.
Also worth noting that Rice's justifications for opposing literally the most broadly popular item on Biden's agenda are almost surreally nonsensical: prospect.org/politics/how-k…
Read 4 tweets
16 Sep
COVID and the moral panic over obesity lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2021/09/covid-…
The vast majority of people in the study who were, per the study’s definitions, unhealthily fat, *did not have any statistically significant increased risk for either hospitalization or death from COVID, relative to people at what the study defines as a “healthy weight.”*
"insignificant differences in relative risk are, in the context of the moral panic over obesity, treated as irrefutable proof that fat people are dying of this or that illness, that has been caused supposedly by their fatness."
Read 6 tweets
16 Sep
I see the WSJ is on its "making $400K a year isn't *really* rich so people in this income bracket couldn't afford a single extra cent in taxes" bullshit again lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2021/09/the-re…
The party of the working class: $11M is a "small nest egg" for a couple
To state the obvious, saving lots of money so you can enjoy luxurious consumption without working at a relatively young age doesn't make you less rich than if you engage in the luxurious consumption now -- indeed, quite the opposite
Read 4 tweets
15 Sep
LOL Glenn wanted California to have an anti-vaxx MAGA governor so desperately, and now he's lashing out at people for pointing out how badly his side got crushed
This is particularly devastating for Glenn because the recall vote became a referendum on the DeSantisian anti-anti COVID policies he strongly prefers, and it has to sting how much better CA is doing than Texas and Florida
Tune into Tucker tonight to see Glenn talk about how it's extremely bad for cable news hosts to have a preference for one political party over another
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(