So one of the funny things from that "Mesa County Dominion deletes files" report is the screenshot they take of the report produced by the FTK Imager.
It's missing a line of text: the name of the examiner who created the image. The name was "cjh" which many claim is Conan Hayes
It's missing a line of text: the name of the examiner who created the image. The name was "cjh" which many claim is Conan Hayes
With the magic of cryptography, we KNOW for certain the name was deliberately removed in that graphic. That's because the MD5/SHA1 hashes confirm this is the SAME system image that was posted online during Lindell's Cybersymposium.
Yes yes, I know, both MD5 and SHA1 are broken and it's possible to create two files with the same hashes, that SHA2 needs to be used to actually be certain. But it still would require participation of the person who created them -- not something done after the fact.
Moreover, both MD5 and SHA1 match -- nobody has yet produced two different files where both hashes match.
QED: we can be absolutely certain given the current state-of-the-art of cryptography, that the authors of that report deliberately removed the examiner's name "cjh".
QED: we can be absolutely certain given the current state-of-the-art of cryptography, that the authors of that report deliberately removed the examiner's name "cjh".
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
