With French Defence Minister Florence Parley in Mali attempting to stop the deployment of Russian troops in Mali, let's take an in-depth look at the big picture. What is really going on.
France is all over the place. From West Africa to Central Africa to Libya to Southern Africa to an apology tour of Rwanda to the South China Sea to Australia. It takes an incredible amount of andrenaline to maintain this tempo of engagement,
Picture this. You’re driving down a road, singing along with your favorite song, cool air rushing in, when out of nowhere a trailer appears in a bend in the road. Before you know what’s happening, you swerve to miss it and slam on your breaks. You’re breathing hard and fast,
your heart is pounding, your legs are shaking, your body is sweating, but your mouth is dry. Your body go from relaxed in the driver’s seat to full fight or flight mode in seconds.
This is what France is dealing with. They are losing ground everywhere and its scary.
The latest U.S, British an Australia pact delivers France some hard truths. Recalling its Ambassador to the U.S is beyond infantile. When they pick themselves up from their humiliation, the French will need to gather their sangfroid and confront some cruel verities.
ONE. There is no sentiment in geostrategy. The French must see there is no point in wailing about having been shoddily treated. The United States is a superpower. France is not. With rising tensions with China, the United States can come to the aid of Australia.
France cannot. The fact is that the Australians realize the Chinese threat is real and so needed to boost their level of deterrence.
Whoever heard of a nation short changeing its defence priorities out of not wanting to give offence?
They are doing the exact same thing to Mali. Mali is a sovereign country not a French colony. They reserve the right to plot their own security future. Sometimes nations decide their interests are best served by joining alliances. No sentiments.
The second truth is that
..70+ years after the end of WW II, Europe expects the United States to keep subsidizing their defence while they build amazing infrastructure and take care of their citizens. The moment the U.S makes a pivot to pursue its own national interest France and Germany are quick
to label the U.S isolationist or Nationalist. Think about it. The United States was forced to clean up Europe's mess not once but TWICE in two world wars. After the war the United States spent
..billions of dollars under the Marshal Plan to rebuild western Europe. The United States also provided a security umbrella against the Soviets, allowing Europe to focus squarely on economic development rather than having to worry about the Soviet threat. Its been 70+ years.
When Trump realized France was using U.S logistics assets as a piggy bank and wanted to pull out U.S forces from Niger, Chad and Cameroon, Emmanual Macron flew to Washington to basically plead with Trump not to pull out U.S forces, saying the region will descend into chaos.
Europe is having a hard time coming to grips with the fact that the US no longer has any great interest in the outdated behemoth that is NATO that was used as riot police to destroy Libya.
Gaullists in France, and President Emmanuel Macron is one of them - dream of their
country as a fully independent power, exercising its force for good thanks to a global presence and nuclear backed military strength. France has cleverly bound itself to the US led alliance for expediency. France is almost like Iran.
Libya is an example. They could never go it alone. The U.S is the only nation in the world today with the logistics assets to mount a massive operation thousands of miles from home. To achieve its aim France used NATO as a clever bit of subterfuge to weasel America's assets.
How do i know this? Well think about it. France pulled out of the military arm of NATO in 1966. Then in a move that surprised everyone Nicolas Sarkozy, out of the blue restored France's membership in 2009. Just like that. Two years later Nicolas Sarkozy is calling on a military
on the most powerful military alliance in human history, an alliance created to fight a nuclear 3rd world war with the Soviet Union, to stop the riots in Libya.
Two years ago Emmanuel Macron described NATO as "brain-dead".
Today he is displeased about America's pivot to Asia, and like it did in 1966 when France pulled out of NATO, Emmanual Macron like
..a petulant child recalled its Ambassador. While that is still going on we have the French Defence minister in Mali trying to scuttle the country's security arrangement with Russia. If France was a human being, a appointment to the "ward" for emotional burnout will be in order.
But the third harsh truth is, as Chimamanda Adiechie said, France seems to have forgotten it is no longer an 18th Century world power.
There is no obvious other way for France to fulfil its global ambitions. It lacks the capability.
The lesson of the last weeks AUKUS pact between the U.S, Australia and the UK is that France by itself is too small to make much of a dent in strategic affairs. The prospect of France challenging China is laughable. China is a superpower. Its the richest nation on earth.
Every four years the Chinese build as many ships as there are in the entire French fleet. When it came to the crunch, the Australians preferred to be close to a superpower, not a minipower.
France should accept the reality the glory days of Napoleon is never coming back. The Australians are a pragmatic bunch. The U.S is the only country that can cripple China economically and militarily. The UK's is Europe's only other serious army.
The two countries have similar histories and world experiences. Their soldiers respect each other. Britain and not the other war round. Britain has a thriving economy that does not rely on the resources of Common Wealth member states.
It has arguably the second capable navy in the world. Mali, and much of francophone AFRICA is tired of Paris and wants to chart its couese for its own destiny. That is the last of Macron's painful truths.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
More than 8,000 Boko Haram terrorists have surrendered from their enclaves and hideouts. And whether you like it or not, the Shock and Awe strategy i.e overwhelming firepower is responsible for this development.
Are there still abductions? Yes of course. There will be attacks
..on soft targets. Its a given there will be high profile attacks. But we cannot deny the fact the tide has changed dramatically. The Shock and Awe and Scorched Earth strategy is working. The army has blocked logistics routes and supplies thanks to robust ISR operations.
The Air Force has bombarded every known hideouts and camps. These guys are as dumb as a rock. They get married, raise kids in the forest. They get regular visits by their sympathizer Sheikh Gumi and they bask in a false sense of security. They mistake the military's patience
Nigerian Air Force 1980s versus 2021 who wins? (TWO PA)
Background.
After the Nigerian Civil War, in the the Soviet Union delivered 25 MiG-21MF and six MiG-21UM fighters to Nigeria. The MiG-21MF worn camouflaged paint while the two seater arrived with metal color.
The MiG-21 Fishbed was badass at its time,equipped with Soviet RSBN, a short range navigation system. When Chadian forces invaded Nigeria's Lake Chad islands in April 1983, the MIG-21 had its baptism of fire. Its performance showed the military the value of air power.
MiG-21 harassing strikes halted the advance of Chadian forces and bought the army time to mobilize. By the time the army, led by GOC 2rd amoured division Gen M Buhari was fully mobilized and attacked, the Chadians, already weakened by days of airstrikes capitulated and fled.
Could Nigeria's decision to aquire 24 M346FA attack jets be to replace the Alpha Jet as the frontline aviation (work horse) of the Nigerian Air Force? From a cost effective tactical solution standpoint it makes perfect sense.
For decades the Alpha jet was the work horse of the NAF. we had them in numbers than any other fixed wing airframe in our inventory. They were easy to operate and maintain.
So if the NAF is phasing out the Alpha jets
..we all assumed the high performance JF-17 Thunder
will take up that role. But we gonna need so many of them. Besides, why stress the airframe of arguably our best anti-ship weapon missile carrying platform and strategic air defence for low intensity conflict?
We will not be at war with Boko Haram forever. The insurgency in itself is DEAD. What we have are marauding criminal gangs and enterprises carrying out criminal activities like robbery,
..abduction for ransome under the name of "terrorism". They carry out criminal activities and get rewarded with media notoriety.
This level of notoriety is in itself addictive. They dont even bother pretending to be fighting for a cause anymore. No manifesto, no objective
..just sensless attacks because of the media notoriety that comes with it. Once in a while they hit pay dirt, attacking military formations. It doesnt matter if hours later they are flushed out, so long as it made it headline news its victory for them.
Poland and Nigeria initially signified interest in the Rooivalk. Poland was seeking new attack helicopters under its Kruk programme while Nigeria has an urgent operational requirement for attack helicopters to combat Boko Haram militants. The diplomatic row over
..the arrest of Nigeria's armed agents and confiscation of funds killed any chance of Nigeria aquring the Rooivalk. We went for the Mi-35M instead. Unfortunate turn of events as the Rooivalk was of a much modern design.
Its a season of outrage for Paris. Turkeys involvement in Libya left France fuming. Russia's involvement in the C.A.R left Paris fuming. ECOWAS demand for a return to constitutional order in Guinea and threats to impose sanctions left Paris fuming.
Mali's pivot to Russia left Paris fuming with threats it could take relations between France and Mali to breaking point.
This underscores growing Russia influence in region. Be not surprised if we eake up to news of another coup de etat in Mali days from now.
Now the United States, Britain and Australia has formed a strategic defence deal for the Indo pacific region to help share better defence capabilities. Now i can understand why China will see things differently and criticize the deal