For some reason, over the past few weeks I've been fascinated by Flat Earther videos (did quite a number on my Youtube homepage). I guess I should write a bit about what I saw but here's a few quick thoughts
1. It's a modern movement. They aren't holdovers from a previous historical or traditional movement. This tells you something - if this is a modern movement then the reasons it exists are also modern issues
2. They actually *do* seem to obsess over "evidence". Only, they twist it around in a clever way. "Evidence" for them is redefined to "whatever can change my mind" (and since nothing can, then problem solved)
3. It's an actual community that's somehow defined by collective adoption of a counter-truth. Members have both a need to belong to a group, and pressure to conform to the group truths, at pain of excommunication (and relentless trolling)
4. There's a whole cottage industry of sciency-type Youtubers dedicated to "debunking" them and what's interesting is that these debunkers actually end up reinforcing the community. They *need* adversaries so they can close ranks and "unite"
5. When you do come across someone who's "left" Flat Earth (there's a few videos of that) the more interesting story of how they got in/got out isn't really about the facts at all, but about personal issues
6. Yes there is some intersection with old world creationists and others who are trying to "prove the bible", but most of them really aren't in it for religious reasons. It's more about feeling they're the special ones who can see through the matrix or something
It's basically another counter-modernity movement that uses the language and tools of modernity ("evidence", "logic", etc) to "disprove" one of the most foundational elements of modernity (science). It's fascinating. And now my Youtube recommendations are a mess.
I don't know, I guess I'm fascinated by... movements that come together over collective rejection of reality? Or maybe I'm really interested in how communities react when their foundational truths are no longer true? Or how human beings can create their own truths? Or something
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Optimism is not a plan. Anger is not power. Euphoria is not a national vision. Emotions are not a roadmap.
Mental prisons are more oppressive than physical prisons. And the worst prisons are those we build for ourselves
I'm a strategist. My job is to live in the future. To look at the big picture, to see everything as a trend, to think 20 moves ahead (and 20 years ahead). My brain is wired this way now.
Very quick stream of consciousness (again), apologies in advance for all the typos, mistakes, inaccuracies etc. Among Islamist militants there have been (generally) two models:
The Caliphate model calls for the establishment of a global empire (although they'll resent the word "empire"). The Emirate model calls for the establishment of local rule (a state with limited borders) and a governance model, sometimes as the goal, sometimes as a start.
ISIS generally represents the first model. The Taliban represents the second model. ISIS refers to itself as Dawlat al-Khilafa (the Caliphate state). The Taliban's official name for Afghanistan is "the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan".
I think it's time that Middle Eastern activists of a certain... ideological extraction realize that the US politicians will never save you, will never center you, will never exact justice for you, and will never put you first. Piggybacking off another's power is disempowering.
Inherent in their faith (and disappointment) in one US president after another is a belief that the US "rules the world", so all they must do is bend US power, however slightly, to our benefit. But this is based on an antiquated worldview. Even when it wasn't, it never worked.
(I'm tweeting this because something came up on my TL and I did not want to respond directly. Yes this is a subtweet.)
I literally described what happened and how I felt about, and for that I'm called "arrogant and bad faith". For describing how humiliated I felt, I'm being called "arrogant". Look, you can dislike what I'm saying, but you cannot argue my lived experience and how it made me feel.
To be Palestinian is not merely a nationality, it's also a lived experience. And since my people have been atomized and isolated from each other, this has become *multiple* lived experiences. I came face to face with that between 2014 and today.
Nobody should shy away from talking about their experiences because we're all equally valid as human beings. You cannot shut someone's lived experience with your opinion. You cannot argue other people's emotions. And you cannot become the arbiter for who does or doesn't matter.
Wanna write a scifi story about a portal that opens up in China to another habitable planet halfway across the universe, resulting in China becoming 1000x as rich and powerful as it is now and all the upheavals that would follow
Part of that is China developing 23rd century technology, dominating the world and having to evolve social and economic structures fit for a 23rd century society meanwhile the rest of the world is still dragging its ass from the 20th
Then the new Chinese empire will tell the rest of the world that the reason China is so advanced has nothing to do with that portal or the new planet, it's because Chinese people are inherently better than all other humans, and their history proves it