Let's check the reply from DARPA head of communications to Irene of Presa Diretta ()
- In accordance with US. Fed. Acquisition Regulations we are not at liberty to divulge who may or may not have submitted a proposal in response to any of the agency's solicitations.
- Since EcoHealth Alliance was not **ULTIMATELY ** selected to work on the DARPA PREEMPT program..
The ULTIMATELY gives the game away. DARPA is actually telling that EcoHealth Alliance did bid.
And:
- Information contained within bids is considered proprietary and can only be released by the bidder.
- Since EcoHealth Alliance was not ultimately selected to work on the DARPA PREEMPT program, we recommend that you reach out to them for comment.
=> Why the Since statement?
Basically it means that DARPA has nothing more to do with EHA application - it failed and that's it.

And in saying so, they again confirm that EHA is in position to comment on it.
Last I want to reiterate that DARPA did the right thing by tuning that madness down.

But the WIV did not need DARPA money, and would have tried to stay ahead of the game anyway - it has plenty of funding from China in this competition.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Gilles Demaneuf

Gilles Demaneuf Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @gdemaneuf

21 Sep
Good coverage in the Telegraph by @sarahknapton.
web.archive.org/web/2021092118…
"Papers, ***confirmed as genuine by a former member of the Trump administration***, show they were hoping to introduce “human-specific cleavage sites” to bat coronaviruses which would make it easier for the virus to enter human cells. "
Darpa refused to fund the work:
“It is clear that the proposed project led by Peter Daszak could have put local communities at risk”, and warned that the team had not properly considered the dangers of enhancing the virus (gain of function research) or releasing a vaccine by air"
Read 9 tweets
21 Sep
An interesting paper from the Beijing team behind the DBatVir DB (a database that is still online, not like the WIV).
Not peer reviewed.

Cast doubt on the market origin, shows that Yunnan and Laos are good candidates for SARS-CoV-2 relatives.
researchsquare.com/article/rs-885…
Very careful wording, taking into account possible under-sampling:
'indicating that SC2r-CoVs might not actively circulate among bats in China'
Pours some cold water on the pangolins origin story.

"However, whether these bat and pangolin species could serve as the direct natural reservoirs and intermediate hosts for SARS-CoV-2, respectively, remains unknown because of significant remaining genome differences"
Read 4 tweets
21 Sep
My quick notes on the rightly rejected DEFUSE project.

drasticresearch.org/2021/09/20/158…
First DARPA did the right thing.

The project seems incredibly risky, very arrogant, and doing it with China makes little sense in the stated context of protection of the US troop deployed in Asia.

How could EcoHealth alliance hope to pull that one?
Wisely DARPA only selected teams from the US, UK, Australia (the Five Eyes without NZ & Canada), Estonia (a strong ally) and the Pasteur Institute for its reach in Africa and South East Asia.

No Chinese team there.
Read 21 tweets
17 Sep
Here is presentation on the deleted DB. Works on mobile too.

Just click on the slide or use the left/right arrow keys to navigate:
bit.ly/3nF01M9
Also a reminder that we are populating an interactive Google map of Wuhan with multimedia:

Wuhan Map (street map mode) - google.com/maps/d/viewer?…
You can do a search - just type something there:
Read 5 tweets
16 Sep
An interesting Politico article by Michael Callahan, former biosafety physician for the U.S. State Department’s Bio-Industry Initiative in the former Soviet Union and Bio-Engagement Program in Asia.
politico.com/news/magazine/…
One key section:
Which basically links bak to Jasper Baker's recent book:
Made in China - Wuhan, Covid and the Quest for Biotech Supremacy
hurstpublishers.com/book/made-in-c…
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(