The biggest effect of the global pandemic is that it disrupts how everyone frames their daily life. It breaks us out of our old habits and creates entirely new ones.
Modern humans are creatures of habit. At a very young age, we are introduced to routines that eventually become habitual. The most efficient of us learn the habits of success at a very early age. The rest of us just muddle our lives away.
The habits that we develop from childhood to the present are who we are. They are our own personal creations. This is why habits (which are all mental in nature) are something we have difficulty abandoning. They are what defines us.
Habits are formed as a consequence of previous habits. The primordial habits of anyone are what we call personalities. There are many models of personalities, but they all share one idea in common.
To illustrate, let's look at two models of personalities. The Big Five (Openness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Agreeableness, Neuroticism) and Meyers Brigs. They can have different categorization schemes but ultimately they are about one idea.
They are about different habits of how our selves interact with other stuff in this world. For Big Five (OCEAN) it is our selves negotiate with experiences, shared spaces, communication with others, ideas, and our inner self.
For MBTI, it is framed (albeit unscientifically) according to recurring habits of thought. Source of energy, sensing, decision-making and emphasis in structure.
There is a multitude of problems that people solve. We solve these problems by leaning on our habits of thought. Learning is also problem-solving. Learning to learn leans heavily on our thought habits.
Habits are thoughts that we do automatically. Thoughts that require minimal effort. We feel more energy when we perform tasks that our habits are tuned for. We feel exhausted when we do task that we can't bank on our habits.
Becoming adults also requires the breaking of habits that we develop as children. We become adults by widening our scope of self and hence breaking our habits of how we think of ourselves.
The difficulty of making progress is that we have to break our own habits of thought. But these habits are tied to our personalities, and certain personalities are tuned better at breaking habits.
Humans are a collaborative species and we excel best when we mix different personalities to solve complex problems. We need rule breakers to innovate and we need anal people to execute complex processes.
Unfortunately, modern civilization has a bad habit of Monism. That there is one true habit and pluralistic approaches are denied as something pagan. But complex problems are only solved through a diversity of thought processes. Solved through a diversity of personalities.
Unfortunately, habits lead to thought bubbles and silos. It is not uncommon for industry leaders (ex. Nokia) to be quickly vanquished as the technological landscape changes. Habits can be our greatest strength and our Achilles heel.
But what happens in a global pandemic when our work habits, the habits that made us efficient, are disrupted. It becomes exhausting to work because we forgot our habits. Furthermore, we see the world differently when our habits change. We value our time and lives differently.
'Laying flat' and 'The Great Resignation' are manifestations of a change in habits and thus a change in perspective. There was a time in the past where not working on weekends was a luxury, but now it's a habit. The pandemic has lead to new habits that changes everything.
Just as adult cognitive development required changing habits, society changes itself because people change their habits. Society remains stagnant because people refuse to change their habits.
It's thus extreme irony that the fastest way to get back to the old normal is to temporarily change our habits by accepting inconveniences (masks and vaccination). Unfortunately, that didn't happen. The old normal isn't coming back.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Carlos E. Perez

Carlos E. Perez Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @IntuitMachine

23 Sep
Challenge: Describe in words why when you look in the mirror your left and right sides have flipped but not the top and bottom. But when you lie down horizontally, what side was on the bottom is now on the top. As if the top and bottoms have flipped.
This demonstrates that words can generate a paradox when there is none. Why is it that in one case the mirror flips horizontally and in another case, it flips vertically? How does the mirror know when and how to flip the image?
Words are instructions of imagination. It is like a magic trick when words distract you from the solution of the problem. Why does a mirror flip an image vertically or horizontally depending on a person's reference frame?
Read 16 tweets
22 Sep
A key algorithm for general intelligence is a compensation mechanism for category error. This is because anything that learns must recognize that their habitual models of thought can be in error.
Planck remarked that science makes progress one funeral at a time. The problem with the human condition is that we are so devoted to the personal habits we invented for ourselves that we have difficulty letting them go.
Even more difficult, we embed in our language habits of thought. We are unable to break out of this jail because we cannot express new things with an old vocabulary.
Read 12 tweets
21 Sep
SMH, seems like researchers don't know how to measure the generality of a large language model. Larger GPT-3 models are much better at discerning intent in zero-shot tasks. So I do find the paper described here as missing the target.
Generality implies greater creativity. Lying just happens to require creativity. I better measure would perhaps be a rewriting task. Smaller models don't have subspaces where rewriting even exists.
Another measure may be in joke generation. Larger models without a doubt come up with more unique jokes.
Read 4 tweets
19 Sep
I am curious, what countries actually have restrictive rules against multi-level marketing business models? It's pervasive and legal in the USA. I ask because this docuseries about Lularue is an eye-opener to its inner workings. amazon.com/LuLaRich-Seaso…
Multi-level marketing has been around for a long time in the USA. Examples of companies that have been around a long time are Tupperware, Avon and Amway.
But it's interesting that almost every human institution is like a multi-level marketing scheme. But unlike an MLM the rules of the hierarchy are tacitly encoded and the rewards are more intangible.
Read 11 tweets
15 Sep
What I find very weird is that people are surprised with the notion that someone taught himself a skill. As if a teacher was absolutely necessary to learn anything. As if you can't learn anything by reading and experimenting by yourself.
"Wow, he's self-taught, he must be extremely gifted!" Are people, in general, incapable of learning anything without a teacher?
But to be perfectly fair, I'm in awe with kids who self teach themselves how to play music. I don't think I have the passion to do that! So I suspect this self-taught thing has everything to do with passion and talent.
Read 13 tweets
15 Sep
I'm coming to the realization that the GOP isn't a conservative party but rather an incoherent group of disenfranchised parties. Any group that has trouble pushing its agenda sees an opening by joining the GOP. It's also a business model to milk the disenfranchised.
Trump perhaps saw this so he reached out to any and every fringe group for their support. Any group, no matter how abhorrent their views are welcome in the GOP. But how do they handle conflicts between parties in the group?
They actually don't need to be because incoherence is the mode of operation. Trump has consistently been logically inconsistent. It is the same for parties within the GOP. They band together not because of commonality but rather because of shared disenfranchisement.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(