The new family (post vivāha) is the rightful family. The (ritualistic) allegiance of the married woman is now to the kulāchāra, pitaras of new family. Doesn’t mean severance of emotional attachment to parental dévatā, pitaras and family - speaking about ritualistic position here.
After saptapadi, the new couple “ought to” propitiate paternal pitaras (first) - pitaras (of wife’s parent lineage) are propitiated after husband’s father-GF-GGF’s tarpaNa - many times it is optional.
It is husband’s pitaras and kuladévatā (if properly propitiated) that bless couple with children.
Husband is the medium through which Shruti-smriti based upāsanā of wife happens - whatever upāsanā (of any devatā except husband’s ishTadévatā) husband does, wife gets half of it.
One’s ishTa-dévatā is one’s real and truly personal deity which looks after adhyātmik tāpa of an individual- here husband and wife (and children) can have separate ishTa. But beyond the limits of body, everything is shared - either within the family, or clan or nation.
So any upāsanā of ishTa is personal. Any other upāsanā is shared.
If husband is wearing yajñopavita of wife for her, then it is logical she will get fruits from what husband does in nityakarma like sandhyā etc.
So what would a Hindu couple do (in absence of modern law) when each other’s company became insufferable?
They separated. Even after that, the separated wife still is “looked after” by the kuladevata.
Widow/divorcee Remarriage is a new concept in dharma (in its current form).
There cannot be a dhārmik (Shruti-smriti-purāNokta) justification for widow or divorcee remarriage.
So this is one lacuna in Hindu vivāha.
As per dharma, vivāha is a sanskāra. Not a contract. So there isn’t a “termination clause” in Hindu vivāha.
Similarly, there cannot be a LGBTQ vivāha as per dharma.
Dhārmik LGBTQ people can get registered as per prevalent “this-worldly” law of country and stay together.
They should continue their sādhanā of their ishTa dèvatā and complete this birth.
But lastly - dharma is sukshma.
Nobody can claim to know it all except dharmodadhi Shri vishNu.
Many of my friends (girls) have gotten divorced (bad choice first time), found a very good man, got married.
Living a very content bhautik-adhidaivik-adhyātmik life with new husband
They follow kulāchāra of 2nd husband, assumed gotra of 2nd husband. Have good kids & leading a very dhārmik life
We all have to bear fruits of our (past) karma. If someone is fated to have this experience, I pray that they find trividhā-Shānti. Either with a new partner or alone
Who knows - perhaps that experience unlocked something in their antahkaraNa which enabled them to channel their chittavruttis to “get it right” the second time
May be a perfect yoga (of indriya-manas-buddhi-ahamkāra) with new husband (wife) formed the second time.
But These are exceptions. For every perfect second match there are many unhappy matches too.
These examples are not (and should not be) the rules.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
After land reform, these large plots were broken down (we call it kooL-kaaydaa in Marathi - the family who tilled the fraction of larger plot owned by zamindar inherited that plot).
Result - creation of small fraction. In 2 generations we have micro plots 1-2 acre. Game over.
After some struggle, the grandkids of that original tiller get frustrated and sell their plot to some wealthy fellow. The wealthy fellow starts consolidating the land into bigger plot (100-500 acres) and starts smart farming.
Great grandkids again become employees in that farm
In kanyadaana, father donates this wealth (that is kanyaa) to groom.
PS - Wealth is NOT SAME AS Commodity!! We do PraaNadaana, Jeevandaana, Raktadaana, Vidyadaana, Abhayadaana, Chumbanadaana (donation of kiss). None of these things are "commodities".
If Kanyaa is commodity (cheez as that bollywoodiya girl says), then so is blood, knowledge, kiss, life.. So perspective please.
After kanyaadaana, there is laajahoma (brother helps/defends the groom from three devatas who are protecting a girl since her birth).
I Do sandhyā, Deva abhisheka, TarpaNa and Vaishvadeva daily.
If this is trad, I am trad.
But my political opinions on Savarkar and sangh and utilitarianism of Hindutva is well known.
Question is how much you stretch this logic and try to milk it to pull a rank.
If my trikāla sandhyā starts interfering with my judgment on political choices, I have lost the path.
Savarkar or Sangh is the “right” path in current time and space. Some other may have been right path for some other time and place.
Trikāla sandhyā is irrelevant here.
Trads on twitter think that since they do trikāla sandhyā, their opinions on politics too are to be taken seriously no matter how illogical or non-sensical they are.
That’s when they start becoming pain in the Musharraf.
If have no internal motor (of sādhanā / upāsanā/ kriyamāNa karma / efforts) in the ship, then the course of ship is decided by the cumulative vector sum of these waves and currents and winds.
Ships go where these factors take it along.
If, on the other hand, our ship is a motorboat (engine of our sādhanā / upāsanā), then one can chart one’s course as per one’s will (waves, currents and winds may oppose or support or be tangential to the journey).