Taking a brief break from my Twitter hiatus to write a Thread about the history of tabloids.
As @sarahkendzior points out, bad actors cover up crimes with scandal.
Tabloids are propaganda tools that help them do this. It's dangerous to call them harmless gossip rags.
Thread.
In 1952, an MIT grad who spent a year working for the CIA as a "psychological warfare officer" bought the paper that would become The National Enquirer.
His name was Generoso Pope Jr. and he was backed by his childhood friend and his godfather: Roy Cohn and Frank Costello. 1/
Cohn's connections to organized crime is well documented, but he also had ties to government officials, media figures, and even intelligence.
When McCarthy was staffing up for his anti-Communist hearings, J. Edgar Hoover personally recommended Cohn for chief counsel. 2/
Frank Costello, Pope Jr's primary backer, was the head of New York’s Luciano crime family.
He wasn’t just his godfather, but the inspiration for Marlon Brando’s infamous character as well. 3/
The first tabloid was a project funded by the mob and crime-adjacent individuals tied to corrupt government officials. It also happened to be run by a CIA-trained psy-ops guy.
This legacy remains in the industry today. 4/
In the years that followed, tabloids consolidated under acquisitions from individuals tied to intelligence agencies, organized crime, and government officials.
Two of the biggest players? Robert Maxwell and Rupert Murdoch. 5/
The landscape changed a bit after the deaths of Pope Jr and Robert Maxwell, but this consolidation continued through the 90s.
In 1999, Clinton-ally Roger Altman bought a controlling stake of AMI, the conglomerate which owned the National Enquirer. 6/
Tabloids may not seem important, but they're tools exploited by people of influence and governments to sway public opinion.
Through "Catch and Kill" operations, they're also used to hide damaging secrets through NDAs. 7/
If tabloids are little more than harmless "scandal rags", why do nefarious individuals with unimaginable resources keep using them?
If they don't matter, why have powerful people spent decades fighting over their control? 8/8.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The best manager I've ever met never finished college. He was loud, unprofessional (but not disrespectful), and you had to double-check his paperwork because he lacked attention to detail.
He transferred in from another location and was loathed by upper management. 2/
They put him on the "worst" team in the organization and planned to get rid of him when the numbers didn't change (everyone knew this group was hopeless).
You can probably guess what happened. Just like Gordon Bombay, he turned this team of misfits into all-stars. 3/
There's something really important I'm BEGGING people to wrap their heads around:
Laws only matter to honest people.
Legislation will determine how easy cheating is, but even if Dems miraculously pass everything the GOP still won't recognize the results of the next election.
During a 30-minute call that was recorded before he became a candidate, William Braddock repeatedly warned not to support Anna Paulina Luna in the Republican primary for a Tampa Bay-area congressional seat because "he had access to assassins." politico.com/news/2021/06/1…
"I really don't want to have to end anybody's life for the good of the people of the United States of America."
"That will break my heart. But if it needs to be done, it needs to be done."
"I have access to a hit squad, too, Ukrainians and Russians."
Braddock also made rambling statements about getting financial help from fellow Freemasons, or by importing millions of dollars from Malta and Gibraltar.
2/ Accelerationists recognized QAnon as a recruitment opportunity.
This violent right-wing ideology believes that governments are irreparably corrupt, so the only solution is to "accelerate their demise by sowing chaos and creating political tension." vox.com/the-highlight/…