I don't even know what people really mean by "Lehman Moment" anymore, but IMO, the greatest sources of market panic/pure fear come when it appears that the mechanics of the government/politics are incapable of doing bailouts/stimulus. (EG the TARP vote.
I don't think China will ever have this exact problem. They may have painful losses, and other calamities. But due to the nature of their system, there probably won't be a period where people wonder if Beijing is capable of bailing out the financial system.
Same with Europe. There were moments in 2011-2013, when it seemed genuinely possible that the nature of the euro area/ECB structure was not mechanically up to the task of stopping an uncontrolled financial panic.
Draghi's "Whatever it takes" speech, where he established that sovereign credit spreads were part of the ECB's mandate ended the crisis, but until that moment, I think there was ambiguity for various reasons about whether the political tools existed to end the panic.
In March 2020, the market panicked when it appeared (at first) as though Congress would go too small, and nobody appreciated the extent to which the Fed would backstop credit markets. But once those were established the panic ended.
Anyway, going back to China, all kinds of problems probably exist. And I'm far from an expert in the area. But right now, the assumption is that when push comes to shove, the government/PBOC can do whatever it wants to halt financial contagion, cause it can just create money.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The dots probably served a purpose post-GFC, in hammering home the seriousness with which the Fed meant what it said about staying at ZIRP for a long time.
But in framework where destination is supposed to trump path, they inevitably draw FOMC members back into a path discussion
Serious question about blockchain fees. Is there any evidence that any chain has found (or will find) a stable equilibrium such that miners (or validators) are adequately compensated, but the chain doesn't get too expensive, driving users to other chains or other layers?
People like to joke that the goalposts are always moving. That at the end of 2017, the knock on Bitcoin was that the fees were too expensive for anyone to use. And today that's the knock on Ethereum.
But now people point out that Bitcoin's fees are dangerously low?
In theory, Ethereum's fee problem (too expensive) could be solved if everyone uses Layer 2, but then does this pose the risk of fees evaporating on the main chain, creating the same security problem that bitcoin faces today?
On the new Odd Lots, @tracyalloway and I brought back on @Srasgon to explain why, after all this time, the semiconductor supply chain actually seems to be getting WORSE.
@tracyalloway@Srasgon One of the things that I'm learning, from our various episodes on things like chips and also shipping, is just how incredibly messy and inefficient B2B purchasing is.
With shipping, so much of whether you can get space on a vessel (as @typesfast explained) so much depends on whether you know a guy in Copehnhagen who can get your stuff on a boat.
With trucking, a lot of it jobs are just done over random message boards or Telegram groups.
@tracyalloway and I spoke with @aahmady, the former head of Afghanistan’s central bank. We discussed the the events of the last two weeks, bank management in more normal times, and the economic situation the country now faces bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Nearly a year after the framework review at the 2020 Jackson Hole, @tracyalloway and I talked to @neelkashkari about the quest to get to full employment and what it looks like when we're there. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
@tracyalloway@neelkashkari We also talked about the macro situation right now, including inflation, whether it's transitory, what it would look like if it were becoming a bigger problem, and much more.
This wasn't intentional, but last week we had on Dallas Fed President Rob Kaplan, and I realized that Kaplan and Kashkari were the two dissenters at the September 2020 Fed decision. So it's a real treat to have gotten to speak with both of them. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
It took me awhile to appreciate the significance of stablecoins.
I wrote a post for the Odd Lots blog about why and how they're emerging as the true power players within crypto. bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Back in 2016, when the DAO got hacked, Vitalik had some influence in addressing it.
These days when there's a big hack, the only entities that can possibly do anything about it is the stablecoin companies.
Their power and size is why, as my colleague @joelight has been reporting on, there's more and more scrutiny of them in DC bloomberg.com/news/articles/…