1. This is a good listen but the most important factor for the energy transition was barely mentioned which was the backup Energy system. This is the factor that will make or break the energy transition. A reliable back up system.
2. In a push towards renewables, it’s intermittency means a back up system is needed much more and also needs to be much bigger in size. The U.K. saw prices over $3000/ MWh and a significant factor was the loss of its wind generation system.
3. The U.K. has. a 20GW metered system but during the last 3 weeks it was producing less than 3GW. That means the back up system needed to be 17 to 20GW. This is far bigger than if the U.K. lost a nuclear power plant (biggest is 3.2GW) or a Gas Plant (biggest is 1.9GW).
4. But as renewables generation capacity increases therefore the size of the back up will also need to grow as well because when the wind does not blow or the sun does not shine as with the U.K., the whole renewable system will be affected. This will be a massive cost
5. Batteries are mooted as a possible solution as a back up system. But is it really feasible to install a 17GWh or larger battery system that covers 3 weeks of demand? After all there is no excess renewable power to recharge them at night.
6. Natural gas is a necessary backup system but it also needs to be reliable. Storage is a necessary factor and as renewables capacity grows, natural gas storage must grow as well to be able to cover any loss. Because the downtime for the renewable is unknown and unpredictable
7. Currently natural gas also has its own back up in Europe in the form of coal and oil. In the transition it is likely to lose those therefore the gas system must be even more reliable as a back up system than it is as the current primary system. Nothing to fall back on
8. Texas in February proved the problem of an unreliable backup system. After wind power was lost, the Reliability of the gas system was compromised by a lack of winterization. The back up system needs to be better specified and maintained than the primary system.
9. The U.K. back up system worked. It was relatable.and there was never any shortage of gas. Europe’s gas storage was over 60% full and the UKs was nearly 100% full. Price spikes was based on a future event that was not guaranteed to occur - a cold winter
10. But the U.K. system May not be reliable in a cold winter. It’s storage levels are significantly lower than other countries. It holds only about 35bcf compared to Germany’s 780 bcf and Italy’s 680bcf. It relies on on time production.
11. That size is not feasible to continue if renewables become a larger part of the U.K.“baseload” generation. All storage in Europe must be reevaluated particularly if investment in natural gas is reduced because of poor policy decisions and investor pressure.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Big_Orrin

Big_Orrin Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Big_Orrin

13 Sep
1. Thread: thought I would put all tweets in one place

Platts and Physical market analysts indicated today that they expect China to release much more from their strategic reserve than previously thought

The believe between 5 and 10 million tonnes (36 and 73mb)
will be released
2. That means before the end of 2021 100mbpd or more could be released from global strategic reserves into commercial inventories for refiners to use

China: 36-73mb
US: 20mb plus crude swaps
India: 4.3mb
3. Why is this significant? because strategic inventories are seen as off market unless an emergency. For China to release from their SPR to affect price suggests that Chinese strategic inventories have more in common with commercial inventories than traditional strategic ones
Read 12 tweets
6 Jun
1. Thread- The current narrative is crude Supply i.e. production is less than Demand therefore market is tight. This is the narrative put out by the IEA, OPEC etc. But it is wrong Supply is not equal to production and demand is not equal to consumption.
2.
Supply= production + change in crude inventories

Demand= consumption + change in product inventories

In between is refiners trying to balance these equations

Currently product inventory are building while crude inventory draw

Therefore production roughly equals consumption
3. In the case of crude oil a production is being augmented by inventories to equal supply while inventories are being used to store excess barrels of product.

It means the oil market is always in a supply and demand balance while inventories exist.
Read 25 tweets
28 Feb
1. Thread

Here are reasons I see the physical oil market as nowhere near as tight as people believe it is

A) Tight market is usually equated to supply/demand balance + amount of spare capacity in market. At moment there is a huge amount of spare capacity that can return quickly
2.

B) Also there is a high level of excess inventories. Any loss of spare capacity at moment is such that spare capacity will still be significantly in excess of normal. Therefore, the perception of a shortage of oil is overhyped.
3.

C) just because excess inventories are being drawn does not mean the market is tight

Excess inventories and normal inventories are different

Normal inventories = risk management
Excess inventories = production

Normal inventories are not currently being touched.
Read 14 tweets
4 Feb
1.Thread

The futures front month of pricing does not equates to the demand for cargoes in that loading month. It only reflects demand for a very small amount (less than 1% of global production) and that is under a very specific contract that only about 6-8 companies trade
#OOTT
2. That contract is the BFOET and the BFOET Partials contract. You buy one of those or 6 partial contracts (from same seller) and you will be delivered a cargo anytime the seller sees fit in the contract month.
3. The cargo delivered is the cheapest (when taking into account Quality Premium) of either Brent, Forties, Oseberg, Ekofisk or Troll. So you buy an April Brent BFOET contract you are paying April Brent futures+Exchange for Physical(premium/discount). It is a fixed price contract
Read 13 tweets
20 Oct 20
1. OPEC+ expect a large stock draw into year end. The problem is where is it occuring? OECD Refineries typically hold a specific number of cover days of production. With margins bad, does not matter how cheap crude is they will not increase cover days because of cash flow.
#OOTT
2. Differentials and CFDs remain weak which indicates low demand for crude oil. Floating storage is increasing at points of production but falling at points of discharge. Both indicators of low demand. Refinery runs are not increasing in the OECD with COVID surging.
3. We are already trading December WAF loading barrels which means arrival in China in Jan/Feb and then processed in Feb/Mar at earliest. ME barrels have been bought for November which means arrival Dec/Jan. So all the buying into year end has already been done for China.
Read 13 tweets
24 Sep 20
1.

Had a few comments about me asking whether peak supply may come before peak demand. So I thought i would write in more than one tweet what my theory is. And it is only a theory.

#OOTT
2. Over the last 6-7 years investment has been low and we have not seen its effect yet. Shale growth covered the demand growth but other projects covered the loss of crude oil as fields started to age and degrade.
3. The lack of investment means that at some point he projects needed to cover the degradation and ageing of fields will just not be there to cover these losses. Shale will grow but shale was a very specific period of time due to capital availability.
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(