BREAKING: Yukutake v. Connors (D. HI): Judge that struck down two of Hawaii's gun registration laws partially denies motion to stay pending appeal. The in-person inspection law is now enjoined and the 10-day expiration law will stay in effect. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Regarding the state's argument that there should be a stay because more people will buy guns: "...an increase in gun ownership is a Second Amendment right, and any increase would be tied to the removal of an unconstitutional restriction on Second Amendment rights."
Regarding the scenarios that Hawaii said will happen if people don't have to get their registered guns inspected: "Contrary to Defendant’s suggestion, those three harms are not likely to occur."
In response to Hawaii's argument that people will start registering guns with illegal accessories and features if the police don't inspect them, the judge says the state could try enforcing the laws that already ban those things:
The judge says that "the prospects of Defendant’s appeal regarding the in-person requirement are diminished" because the DC Circuit struck down a similar law:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rob Romano

Rob Romano Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @2Aupdates

22 Sep
"Because the government has the burden, the lack of evidence would cut in favor of Plaintiffs’ challenge. But this case ends early under the Ninth Circuit’s pre-emptive carve-out for longstanding restrictions, described next."
"It also means that a citizen may not bring an otherwise protected weapon, for example an AR-15 rifle, into a school, the Capitol, a courthouse, a church, or other sensitive places where a legislative body has prescribed reasonable regulations."
"If judges accept Young’s invitation to uphold firearm restrictions without further analysis, a longstanding firearm restriction may be left stuck in the past, only because it has not been challenged before the present."
Read 7 tweets
22 Sep
Brian Barnes from Cooper & Kirk arguing for Guns Save Life
One judge asks Deerfield if the law's amendments (to ban the specified guns) is a repeal and replace. Deerfield says it isn't. Judge asks which parts of the original amendment are still intact.
Deerfield claims that it doesn't ban ownership of "assault weapons" because you just have to keep them outside the city.
Read 5 tweets
22 Sep
Those arguments were... interesting, especially at the end
One of the judges asked if Governor Hochul has the same views on guns as Cuomo, saying "she's from Buffalo."
"I appreciate you advising us that we might get reversed. That very comforting."
Read 4 tweets
21 Sep
Brady: "Americans’ Second Amendment rights must be drawn so as to not infringe on the right of every individual to live, which necessarily includes a right not to be shot."
"Treating the Second Amendment as blanket permission to carry guns in the public square—as Petitioners urge—would render the social contract illusory."
Does it mean that tho Image
Read 8 tweets
21 Sep
Argues that people may conceal carry appropriately in some places, but not in those "riven by gang- and drug-related crime" Image
Says gang members aren't safer when they carry, therefore you shouldn't be allowed to carry: Image
Says shall issue laws would be harder to enforce because police might not be able to stop and question anyone they think might be carrying a gun: Image
Read 6 tweets
21 Sep
The American Bar Association says it has a "policy on concealed carry" opposing shall-issue and urging states to pass may-issue laws: Image
The ABA makes the interesting claim that may-issue states can't safely go to shall-issue because they're currently may-issue: Image
The ABA says you, who won't receive qualified immunity, can't be trusted to conceal carry because the police can't be trusted to not hit bystanders: Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(