Thread by @davidalanlevine

It was a pleasure speaking with @kevinrkosar about the Windham, New Hampshire audit, which is prescient timing considering the release of the Arizona "audit" findings. For a side-by-side report comparing the two and their adherence to best practices, see the thread below.

https://twitter.com/kevinrkosar/status/1441397043524628482

1/Best practice: Have the procedures for the post-election published and finalized before beginning the audit.
Windham, NH: ✅
Cyber Ninjas Arizona: ❌

2/Best practice: ensure chain of custody procedures for election materials throughout the post-election audit process.
Windham, NH: ✅
Cyber Ninjas Arizona: ❌

3/Best practice: Have state and/or local election officials be an integral part of the post-election audit process.
Windham, NH: ✅
Cyber Ninjas Arizona: ❌

4/Best practice: Have transparent post-election audit methods and processes.
Windham, NH: ✅
Cyber Ninjas Arizona: ❌

5/Best practice: Make every effort to educate the public on their post-election audit process, as well as other processes and procedures in place to ensure the accuracy and public trust of the results.
Windham, NH: ✅
Cyber Ninjas Arizona: ❌

6/ Bottom line: The Windham, NH audit is a potential model for how to do post-elections audit well. The Cyber Ninja sham "audit" -- not so much, even if it it confirmed the legitimate #election2020 winner.