Away we go in the #azsenate, where Cyber Ninjas and other contractors are going to present their findings from a GOP-led election review in Maricopa County.
Senate President @FannKfann said of the main finding from the the review (that @POTUS beat Donald Trump in Maricopa County) in a draft report leaked last night: "That is a true statement. That is a true statement."
@FannKfann also claims that Maricopa County violated Arizona election law and procedures, and says today's report will detail those claims.
About the same time @FannKfann made this claim on the Senate floor, @AZSenateGOP released a letter to @GeneralBrnovich raising issues that "merit the attention of your office."
The first to present is Dr. Shiva Ayyadurai, an election conspiracy theorist, who reviewed voter signatures on early ballot envelopes. azcentral.com/story/news/pol…
Arizona verifies early votes by those signatures.
The #azsenate gallery is full of reporters and audit supporters. There’s also a decent crowd in the lobby watching on TVs.
One reason it was helpful to get a leaked copy of the Cyber Ninjas report -- it gave the public time to vet their claims before contractors are given a platform in the #azsenate to frame those findings one way or another.
We don't have that luxury with Dr. Shiva.
We haven't gotten to the Cyber Ninjas presentation yet, but as I mentioned, everyone has had time to digest the draft report leaked last night.
Maricopa County, which has opposed/fought this process, has some thoughts:
This pretty well encapsulates the issue with giving a platform to these claims in this manner. As @FannKfann said, this is a presentation only -- no questions, no public comment, no scrutiny.
Maricopa County has an explanation for what Dr. Shiva describes as "scribbles" or blank early ballot envelopes that were verified by county officials.
As he raises concerns about "questionable" signatures verifications, blanks and scribbly lines, Dr. Shiva keeps saying, dismissively, "perhaps there's an explanation for this."
Dr. Shiva is finished. @FannKfann notes that his report will be uploaded online "as soon as we can get them uploaded." I haven't been told where, exactly, that will be.
An "unredacted" version will be sent to the attorney general's office, she said.
Next up, Doug Logan, the CEO of Cyber Ninjas and the lead contractor on this GOP-led election review.
I'm struck by the fact that Logan spent so much time detailing the processes/procedures for the hand recount of nearly 2.1 million ballots case in Maricopa County, but skipped right over the results of the recount. Maybe he'll circle back.
OK, here's the gist from Cyber Ninjas CEO Doug Logan on the presidential hand recount results: "These are all very small discrepancies. So we can say that the ballots that were provided to us to count in the coliseum very accurately (reflect) the canvass numbers."
ICYMI, Joe Biden won the popular vote in Maricopa County, Arizona.
Logan is now fact-checking himself in real time. He claims Maricopa County waited until the last minute to answer his question about this "discrepancy."
I'd like to ask if Maricopa County directly responded to his questions -- that's what he makes it sound like -- or if he just read one of @maricopacounty's tweets. But no questions are allowed today...
This whole election review process has driven a wedge among @AZGOP members.
Doug Logan is taking a break, and passing the mic to Ben Cotton, who will present on his analysis of Maricopa County's voting systems/equipment.
Cotton tees up a legislative debate that'll start in earnest in January, when #azleg is back. He says he hopes the findings will be turned into "meaningful legislation." Critics have been warning about that for months: npr.org/transcripts/10…
Of course, whether or not his findings actual require "actionable" legislation -- basically, are there actually issues to fix? -- will be challenged by @maricopacounty, to be sure.
A rebuttal of one of the few definitive claims made during Doug Logan's presentation.
Cotton notes that @FannKfann reached an agreement with Maricopa County that may provide some answers, though not direct access, to the county's routers, which he still claims are absolutely necessary to complete this election review.
I'm stepping out for a minute to brief @kjzzphoenix and @npratc listeners on what we've learned so far. Listen live here: kjzz.org
Back to Logan, who's presenting a series of recommendations for changes to election law: From updates to the voter rolls to election software requirements.
Not a great start -- Logan's first slide of recommendations is a list of things @maricopacounty and other county election officials already do.
Here's another one: Doug Logan recommends the legislature create an "Election Audit Department" that conducts audits in various counties on a rotating basis.
Basically, 'let's do this again sometime.'
He's also recommending "special" paper be used as ballots, like paper with watermarks or other identifying features. GOP lawmakers passed teeing up those "anti-fraud" features in the future, though as of now they're not required.
Logan ends by recommending, to much applause from the gallery, eliminating mail voting in Arizona.
He acknowledges that's unlikely -- it's the most popular voting method in the state, and has been used for decades.
Randy Pullen just gave a presentation of the machine recount of BALLOTS. Not the votes on those ballots, just a tally of the number of ballots.
It was a near perfect match.
Ken Bennett, who's been on the outs from time to time with other contractors and @AZSenateGOP leaders, is now citing a bunch of state laws that it's "possible" Maricopa County violated. This is all based on Logan's unsubstantiated concerns.
.@brahmresnik has details on charges made from the time a draft report was leaked last night to the final report presented this afternoon:
.@FannKfann on what happens next: "We are asking @GeneralBrnovich to open a formal investigation." She mentioned the letter sent to the AG, which includes reports and accusations (unsubstantiated) that election laws/procedures were broken.
.@FannKfann makes clear she hopes this is not the last "Arizona audit."
"We need to do audits, to some extent. We need to do bigger audits on every election to make sure everyone is following the rules.”
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@FannKfann Here's the relevant section of the indemnification agreement, signed by Fann on April 20, just before @maricopacounty turned over the materials she subpoenaed:
Not sure if this link will work for everyone, but it appears the @AZSenateGOP's media event is up and running. Follow here: azleg.gov/videoplayer/?c…
@AZSenateGOP No one was allowed to attend in person, so sorry to those who can't watch the feed reliably (me included -- it's cut in and out several times already.)
.@AZSenateDems weren't allowed in either. This isn't your usual "hearing" at the #azleg. There's no specific committee hosting this, just Senate President @FannKfann and Judiciary Chair @votewarren.
Arizona Republican elected officials have reacted to the siege at the U.S. Capitol by blaming, and this is not a comprehensive list, Democrats, Doug Ducey, other Republicans, Antifa, and Congress.
Here's a look back at the last 24 hours in tweets...
In this tweet, @RepGosar repeats baseless allegations that the presidential election was stolen and hints that leftists maybe had a role in the mob?
.@RepGosar reaction to the mob varied, depending on what platform you follow him on. @nickmartin points out the discrepancy between Gosar on Twitter and Gosar on conservative-friendly Parler.
Kory Langhofer, attorney for the Trump campaign, acknowledges that the number of overvotes their case would address "may not make a difference" in the race their interested in: @realDonaldTrump's re-election.
@realDonaldTrump An attorney for @katiehobbs said, and this was fuzzy so I'm not 100% sure, that there aren't a lot of overvotes at stake...
She said an exact number but I couldn't make it out.
Wow OK the numbers were repeated by Thomas Liddy, the atty for Maricopa County:
155,850 votes were cast on election.
Tabulation machines identified just 180 overvotes in the presidential race.
Attorneys withdrew that case on Saturday. But since then they've tried to get the case merged with the Trump campaign's new complaint about "overvotes."
BUT, at a hearing happening now, the judge is skeptical of allowing that...
The timeline is interesting. HOURS AFTER attorneys for the Sharpie plaintiffs withdrew their case, the Trump campaign filed a complaint about overvotes.
The Sharpie attorneys then filed a motion to transfer with the judge handling the Sharpie case.
That judge denied it.
Now the Sharpie plaintiffs have filed a motion to intervene in the Trump campaign's "overvote" case.
There's a different judge overseeing this case. He sounds skeptical of allowing intervention given that the plaintiffs had scheduled hearings in the original case, but gave up.