AOC just posted a 4-page statement where she purports to explain why she voted PRESENT instead of NO on US funding for Israel.

If anyone could find the part where she actually explains why she voted PRESENT instead of NO, please flag it for me. I genuinely can't find it.
AOC's statement is barely comprehensible in the English language. It's like a parody of the worst excesses of modern left-wing discourse: social justice phrases and self-aggrandizing grievances randomly strewn together amidst classic AOC self-victimization about trauma and pain.
I mean, seriously: what the fuck is this and what does it mean?
LOL. Exactly - AOC's entire statement is actually a passionate argument for voting NO (like 4 of her Squad colleagues did). Except she didn't vote no. She voted PRESENT. And after this statement, her reasons for doing so remain as mysterious as ever:

I'm still eager to hear AOC reconcile her PRESENT vote -- not only on this Israel funding but also on Pelosi's increase in Capitol Police funding -- with her prior condemnation of PRESENT votes as cowardice.

Then again, maybe I don't want to hear that.

rumble.com/vmw3nn-two-que…
Was AOC's 4-page statement today about why she voted PRESENT on funding for Israel more coherent or less coherent than the last time she tried to explain her views on Israel and Palestine?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Glenn Greenwald

Glenn Greenwald Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ggreenwald

26 Sep
Great and very important report by three @YahooNews journalist on how CIA spent years plotting against WikiLeaks, including with plans to kidnap or even kill Assange. Mike Pompeo was the key driver. He has snowed many MAGA people: he's pure Deep State.

news.yahoo.com/kidnapping-ass…
The reporting also uncovers a CIA plot under Obama -- during the height of the Snowden reporting -- to classify myself, Laura Poitras and Assange as "information brokers" rather than journalists to justify surveillance of us and even imprisonment, rejected by the Obama DOJ. ImageImage
Note that the theory the CIA at the highest levels invoked to justify spying on and even prosecuting Laura Poitras, myself and Assange -- we're something other than "journalists" -- is the one Brazil used to try to imprison me in 2020 and Biden DOJ is using against Assange now.
Read 12 tweets
25 Sep
NYT: Among Those Who Marched Into the Capitol on Jan. 6: An FBI Informant

"Federal law enforcement had a far greater visibility into the assault on the Capitol, even as it was taking place, than was previously known."

nytimes.com/2021/09/25/us/…
In June, the always-wrong herd animals employed by liberal media corporations mocked those, begun by @DarrenJBeattie, who reported the FBI's role in Jan 6 -- just as they mocked those who said the same about the Gov. Whitmer plot (confirmed by BuzzFeed):

greenwald.substack.com/p/questions-ab…
Throughout the first War on Terror, the FBI was at the center of many if not most of the scary domestic terror plots it accused young US Muslims of fomenting (it was FBI that created and directed those to keep fear levels high), just as they're doing now:

greenwald.substack.com/p/fbi-using-th…
Read 8 tweets
24 Sep
Jen Psaki blatantly lied in 2020 by citing intelligence officials to claim the Biden emails were "Russian disinformation" (those officials admitted they didn't know and had no evidence).

Even a POLITICO reporter just proving the emails were real, she still can't tell the truth:
It's been 5 days since the release of the book by POLITICO reporter @SchreckReports that proves that the Hunter Biden emails were genuine. The outlets that spread the CIA lie -- CNN, MSNBC, PBS, @HuffPost, @theintercept - won't even acknowledge the book let alone admit they lied.
Every single person who works at the media corporations that spread the CIA lie that the Biden archive was "Russian disinformation" knows they lied to protect Biden.

But they also know their audience doesn't care if they get caught lying as long as it's for the right Party.
Read 4 tweets
24 Sep
I have two specific questions for Congresswoman @AOC about her "present" vote on funding Israel's Iron Dome, and I made a short video to lay out the two questions I have for her:

rumble.com/vmw3nn-two-que…
A few points from the above video on @AOC's cowardly and staggeringly hypocritical "present" vote on funding Israel's Iron Dome.

First, to denounce @TulsiGabbard's clearly explained 2019 "present" vote on Trump's impeachment, AOC insisted it's *always* wrong to vote "present."
Yesterday was not the first (or worst) "present" vote from AOC. In May, Pelosi demanded $2 billion more for Capitol Police. The Squad all agreed to join the GOP in voting NO -- until they realized that would sink the bill. So AOC changed her vote to PRESENT to ensure it passed.
Read 8 tweets
23 Sep
Please read this thread. It is such a major scandal that Big Tech censored the Biden reporting in the lead-up to the 2020 election and the corporate media not only cheered that censorship but used a CIA lie over and over to justify its suppression.
I know I've said it repeatedly but I'm going to keep saying it:

It's shocking to watch - even though I know it shouldn't be - that the corporate outlets that spread the CIA lie that that the archive was "Russian disinformation" are just *ignoring* the new book proving they lied.
One of the few programs to interview the POLITICO reporter who proved the Biden archive was real is BREAKING POINTS with @krystalball and @esaagar. Watch them interview Schreckinger here. This is why independent media & free speech platforms are so vital:

Read 8 tweets
23 Sep
The media constantly relies on former national security officials to disseminate narratives (that's who concocted the lie about the Biden archive being "Russian disinformation").

Yet there are trained career liars. And they so often are paid to spin lies, like they did here:
That the two primary liberal cable outlets are dominated in their newsrooms by ex-CIA, FBI, DOJ, NSA and Pentagon operatives should be a huge scandal.

The NYT won a Pulitzer in 2008 for revealing how ex-Generals use network contracts to propagandize:

nytimes.com/2008/04/20/us/…
Hopefully POLITICO will one day learn the lesson to stop relying on these former national security officials which their own reporting today reveals are corrupt. This is what happens when you do it:
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(