I have a reputation among some as being nuanced and even-handed and sometimes I feel pressure to maintain this reputation and not say what I feel is true.
1/?
I think I do a good job at resisting this pressure, but part of that resistance is being honest and public about its existence and potential influence on my public activism - so here it is folks.
More recently I’ve been unusually distressed and pessimistic about our overall state of affairs. I am happy and content with my private life, so I feel confident that this distress is a response to externalities rather than some personal psychic disturbance
I think it would be dishonest to force myself to maintain an attitude of dispassionate equanimity when both observation and reason make a powerful case that our predicament does not warrant such an approach
And indeed if my understanding is correct on where we are headed it would also be uncaring, self-interested and cowardly
So I simply have to accept that a loss in social status and esteem is in my immediate future.
Thankfully any that I may have I never expected nor desired so that should ease the loss.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In hindsight, it will seem as if it happened overnight.
But this kind of ideologically-motivated language will be embraced by all cultural / knowledge-making institutions *very soon* and indeed get increasingly more bizarre, and no amount of ratio-ing by the public will stop it.
The very same people who will in other circumstances insist that language is everything, that words construct thought not the other way around, will act flabbergasted that anyone could find this shift worrying and gaslight them into acceptance.
They are, of course, correct that language and thought are co-dependent, and forcing this linguistic shift will impact the ability of those who disagree to articulate their views and organize a resistance
You think radfems are hyperventilating about the erasure of women, and then you see the nation's largest civil liberties organization literally erase women in a quote about abortion rights and gender equality.
This is a movement that has repeatedly failed to stand for women’s rights where / when they are actually needed, disregarding material needs of all for the social status of a privileged few.
Sorry, all 5 radfems mad online don’t make up for half a hundred orgs and nearly every feminist public figure having completely lost their ability to speak cogently regarding the issues that actually face modern women.
Reducing what is undoubtedly the most vital relation for the most vulnerable, precious humans - the crux of what we call "family" - to merely a physical act, a medical event...
Woke terminology is a pageant of grotesquerie.
Unique in its clinical ugliness, oppressive joylessness, dehumanization... routinely eschewing the essence of a thing for the sake of an inflexible and literal-minded political correctness...
I'm starting to feel that the anti-meritocracy bent among elites has far more to do with white resentment of asians than with any compassion towards underrepresented minorities.
It is not yet cool to be too open about this. I give it <2 years for explicitly anti-asian sentiment to become vogue.
I did not make this connection before I looked into the knee-capping of gifted high schools across the nation.
Almost every time the meritocratic system leads to high levels of asians, sometimes majority asians. The new anti- meritocratic replacement systems *purport* to ...1/2
The story is complex and unique (although the resolution a bit inexplicable). I wish more movies covered the perspective shown in Cuties. The initial marketing definitely did not represent the movie accurately. 1
However, multiple dance scenes throughout the movie really were gratuitous. I was deeply uncomfortable watching them (and indeed looked away).
I understand the disgust around these scenes, and think the many justifications of them are weak. 2