Sometimes in Edinburgh its difficult to imagine a better future. We’re keen to show what might be possible.
Where did we go?
📍 Paris? Copenhagen? Amsterdam? ✈️
Nope….
…🚂 40 miles to the West: Glasgow!
It faces the same issues:
🏥⛑health & 💰inequality
📖legislation / TROs
🅿️🚗legacy of 60s / 70s planning
⛰🌦hills & weather
💰funding challenges
😷Covid affecting local business & more working from home.
Compromises in places - particularly towards the city
But consider the debates in Edinburgh about allowing parking in bike lanes, when with better, accessible designs we can imagine what could be if we #improveNOTremove#lanarkRoad schemes & others
The planned 2006 £2/day charge to pass one of the boundaries would have raised £50mn a year had it been introduced.
By now, the city might have raised an extra £850mn to spend on public transport.
Possibly above a billion if adjusted for inflation.
Almost two decades later, Edinburgh has ambitious car km reduction targets backed (in principle, although sadly not in practice) by 4/5 council parties.
But without measures like a congestion charge to both cut traffic AND raise funds for public transport, those will be missed.
🌳⬆️more trees
♟️⬆️more bollards
🌷⬆️more greenery
🚶⬆️walkable neighbourhoods
🚃⬆️prioritise public transport
🪑⬆️more places to sit
👂⬇️less noise
🚗⬇️fewer (but not no) cars
France is consistently adding green to grey spaces.
And it does so not as an exception, but at the point streets are resurfaced - often filtering them too.
Rather than planters, #Edinburgh needs to add proper rain gardens and greenery as well as…
…street trees.
Trees are either lacking or don’t feature enough in #Edinburgh plans for George Street, Teviot Place, Dalry, the recent tram routes, the West Edinburgh link etc.
#Edinburgh designs are grey, late-1990s designs and not welcoming or climate-friendly.