Sometimes in Edinburgh its difficult to imagine a better future. We’re keen to show what might be possible.
Where did we go?
📍 Paris? Copenhagen? Amsterdam? ✈️
Nope….
…🚂 40 miles to the West: Glasgow!
It faces the same issues:
🏥⛑health & 💰inequality
📖legislation / TROs
🅿️🚗legacy of 60s / 70s planning
⛰🌦hills & weather
💰funding challenges
😷Covid affecting local business & more working from home.
Compromises in places - particularly towards the city
But consider the debates in Edinburgh about allowing parking in bike lanes, when with better, accessible designs we can imagine what could be if we #improveNOTremove#lanarkRoad schemes & others
The planned 2006 £2/day charge to pass one of the boundaries would have raised £50mn a year had it been introduced.
By now, the city might have raised an extra £850mn to spend on public transport.
Possibly above a billion if adjusted for inflation.
Almost two decades later, Edinburgh has ambitious car km reduction targets backed (in principle, although sadly not in practice) by 4/5 council parties.
But without measures like a congestion charge to both cut traffic AND raise funds for public transport, those will be missed.
Why is parking deemed more important than outside space for Cafe Rouge, The Queens Arms or Cote?
Perhaps 40 lost tables?
In the centre of most other Northern European cities this would be timed loading access. Instead we have permanent car storage in a World Heritage site.
The impact assessment is interesting - worth a read - but missed a fundamental point: that if the scheme is watered down with significant exemptions then that mean less funding raised for public transport and more traffic - harming those it identifies as most impacted!