Brentford are a top tactical team who are incredibly difficult to play against. They're similar to Chelsea in the sense that they press high with aggressive wingbacks but are also comfortable blocking space in a 5-3-2 and using their outlets. Their build-up isn't as good though.
Liverpool can exploit that build-up as they're a phenomenal pressing team and Brentford build play in a 2-1 (CB-CB; DM) type shape with drifting central midfielders either side with subpar technicians. Although Brentford are good Liverpool can exploit them in so many ways:
Brentford's build-up, when they go long from goal kicks & LFC win 2nd balls in midfield and exploit them in transition, when playing through their press, breaking down their low block, counter attacks after Brentford successfully mount an attack via winning a duel or playing out.
Also other factors such as set pieces which Liverpool are elite at again this season thanks to van Dijk and Matip.. Liverpool do it all and it's why they're the most complete team in the world.
Brentford will make it a battle, but Liverpool are far more likely to come out on top
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
How Arteta and Arsenal dismantled Nuno's Spurs inside 33 minutes...
Thread:
Arsenal were set up inside a 3-2 build-up with Tomiyasu as a third CB. Previously, against Burnley, the LCM role was a fluid role where Ø moved high and between the lines. However, on my podcast, I suggested that Arteta should revert to a 3-2 build-up with Xhaka in the pivot
because it improves the overload in the build-up & compactness in defensive transition but also because Xhaka adds a calming temperament that Arsenal need in possession amongst all of their youthful signings. So, the build-up dismantled Spurs' press as a result of that overload.
Fabinho is the perfect midfielder. His pass selection is absolutely second to none - rarely does he ever force line breaking or over the top passes but when he does it's at the right time & secondly it's in risk free zones where Liverpool can counterpress if the pass is misplaced
However, more importantly, he excels at the basics of midfield play which is of vital importance. Fabinho is constantly available to receive & is so difficult to dispossess. His passes selection is risk averse but also progressive thanks to his elite temperament & technical level
Fabinho is also comfortable receiving at any angle and playing to the left or right. Those lofted passes out to the fullbacks or wide players within simple circulation is absolutely imperative to Liverpool's possession play. He's even more reliable than Thiago in that regard.
Of course City can win because they have elite players and players who are suited to breaking low blocks down & that'll be a large theme in the game but it's too reliant on sustaining that pressure against an incredible Chelsea team who will prevent them from sustaining pressure.
Game state is a massive factor in this one. If City go 1-0 up Chelsea will have to chase the game which can become awkward against a billion pound team. However, Chelsea will be content within their 5-3-2 block at an even or winning game state, much like the CL final.
Lots of Sancho talk lately and I'm here to set the record straight in this mega-thread...
Sancho is a complete wide player in the sense that he ticks every single box. There's nothing he cannot do. However, complete ≠ guaranteed success, as performing a role is often more valuable than completeness (see Pogba in central midfield vs the likes of Fred and McTominay).
So, with Sancho, does his complete skillset correlate to his role as a wide player in a 4-2-3-1? Yes, it 100% does.
Sancho is more in the ilk of a Ribery than a traditional direct, electric, hit-the-byline winger. He primarily relies on skill to beat his man as opposed to pace.
The only way to judge the long-term future of a top club with its current manager is to look at the system he has implemented and ask yourself 'will this team win a league with this system in the assumption the manager gets what he wants in the market?'
I applied that to Spurs.
A crucial preface is to note that Nuno has only managed a couple of games at the club so this entire thread may become irrelevant if he throws this tactic out the window, which isn't impossible.
Anyway, Spurs press high in a narrow 4-3-3 with inverted wingers, ala Liverpool.
The implementation on the ball is virtually the same as Liverpool's with 3 athletic, ball dominant (bar Alli) 2nd phase midfielders, fullbacks high & wide, and the 3 attackers in close proximity between the lines. All fluid, but good enough to succeed w/ right off-ball structure.
Ahead of Ronaldo's second debut for Manchester United, I think it's important to remember and pay tribute to the man behind it all - Ole Gunnar Solskjaer. Utd were not in a position to bring Ronaldo into the club since Sir Alex left because they were so far behind - not anymore..
When Solskjaer first came into the club, United were very obviously a mess and far from the Champions League spots, let alone challenging for the title. He cleared out a lot of deadwood, sold the overweight and underperforming Lukaku, and signed D. James, Harry Maguire, and AWB.
At the time the market was void of top attackers apart from the mega-deals of Griezmann & Hazard to the top Spanish clubs. Pepe, Haller, Ayoze, Joelinton, & Wesley were amongst the most expensive signings in the PL, highlighting how clubs in the league took gambles in the market.