Exodus Cry has released a trailer for Benjamin Nolot's new film "Raised on Porn," which comes out on Thursday. It argues that porn has destroyed a generation, calling it "the greatest unregulated social experiment in history." 1/
The claim? That for the past 10-20 years, the availability of free online porn has warped a generation's brain, causing them to become addicted to sex, and thus objectify and attack women. The only problem? The actual evidence. 2/
This is claim is one that I hear with thuddening regularity. But the facts don't bear out, especially with the generations — Gen Z ! Millenials! — that has supposedly been destroyed.
Gen Z is, by all accounts, the most consent-oriented, gender-conscious in history. 3/
And over the past 20 years — the period in which porn access exploded — rates of assault have steadily fallen, even as reporting and awareness of what constitutes assault has risen. It's hard to see square the #metoo generation with this fever-dream of mass rapists. 4/
But fundamentalism is remarkably fact averse!
Their real fear is not assault or objectification, which this "porn damaged generation" is tackling with more unparalleled vigor, but that it's hurting heteronormative relationships and gender roles. 5/
This is why they hate porn, sex workers, sex educators, and the kinky, queer and gender non-conforming. It's a threat to an established, Christian order in which men protect women in order to procreate.
And it's been this way for millennia. Don't be fooled.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Absolutely stunning investigation by NPR into the racist, antisemitic, misogynist roots of “porn addiction” junk science — the very stuff being peddled by antipoorn groups in order to pass age-verification bills and other censorship.
If you’ve ever struggled to explain or debate the “porn is bad” crowd, personally or professionally, this is about a good a takedown as you’re going to get from a national publication.
And if you ever wondered about the explosion of anti-SW hate online, have I got an origin story for you.
And, of course, when they say "porn" they mean ANY information related to LGBTQ+ lives. (I'm not being hyperbolic here — they want librarians to be registered as sex offenders)
These are the same groups pushing to have you submit your ID to look at porn ... so you do the math.
I've gotten hoarse saying it, but THE PUSH TO VERIFY ID ONLINE NOT ABOUT "PORN". The laws AS WRITTEN allow censorship of text or cartoons (even descriptions of nudity or body parts).
Nearly anything can be blocked. It's part of plan to censor the internet in its entirety.
I hear this argument A LOT from censorship advocates, usually in regards to liquor or Playboy, not spray paint — so let’s quickly tackle this, shall we?
When you buy liquor (or spray paint, who knew?) you flash your ID. It's quick, it's easy and it's free. If this all that was required of adult sites, I don't think there would be any complaint.
But that's not what's happening.
When you flash you ID — even to buy Playboy — the clerk looks at it and moves on.
They do not record your ID, or ping a government database to see if you're approved. There are no third-parties involved, and no record kept of your purchase. In short, little risk of surveillance
Mindgeek’s 3 lawsuits against German regulator KJM were dismissed yesterday by a German court. KJM — which has threatened adult creators on Twitter with arrest — says they’ll proceed with a nationwide block of their domains. Only it’s not that easy… 1/ computerbild.de/artikel/cb-New…
First, because telecom companies are largely unwilling to get roped the German regulator's sex censorship campaign. One is even suing. 2/ spiegel.de/netzwelt/netzp…
The reason their suing — and why MG was also — was because Germany wants to have control of content outside of Germany. (MG is based in Cyprus, which has ... different laws). Germany wants to treat the internet like airspace, essentially. If it can be accessed in Germany ... 3/
Legislators in Alabama want to force Apple, Samsung, Google and Jitterbug to mandate that phones, tablets and laptops come with porn filters on and activated — whether you want it or not.
Now, device level filters are shockingly effective. They're also super easy to use. Which is why it's stunning to think that they can not trust someone buying a device to decide whether or not to turn it on.
And of course, there's a litany of horror stories that ... I'm willing to bet did not happen.
You want to really deprive El No of income, without depriving marginalized communities of one of their only chances to be visible? #BlockTheBlue selectively (fascists! trolls!) and block advertisers aggressively.
Twitter is one of the only platforms where people who trade sex or make adult content have ANY voice. And even here, they're constantly shadowbanned and harassed. Protect yourself by all means, but understand that a flat #blocktheblue is a campaign of erasure.
The work that @Esqueer_ has been doing is incredible and vital, and the vitriol that trans people (including trans SWers) face is unreal. This isn't about shaming, it's about flagging the fact that #BlockTheBlue will also do real harm.