Creating art which is then roundly enjoyed by others has helped me with perfectionism.
Intellectually, I know that ‘perfect is the enemy of good’.
Unfortunately, my standards for my own work are often far too high to encourage incremental progress & learning in public.
2/8
Part of the reason why I feel that way is because the security community is so frequently negatively judging. As this is the community I joined from a young age, it has molded my behavior to be far too constrained & limited — in direct opposition to the hacker ethos.
3/8
Judging the work of oneself & others to an extremely high (& often unattainable) standard reduces the likelihood that people in a given community will produce original work for the benefit of said community by releasing it publicly — even when such efforts are sorely needed
4/8
The community essentially molded my behavior to the point where I have refused to release original work in the security space.
Meaning: useful code/scripts. Methodologies. Process improvements. Updates to the state of the art in information security. Incremental progress.
3/8
I haven’t always felt the things I’ve created have been good enough to stand up to the intense scrutiny which comes from both being a woman and a human in this space — and even if they were, I wanted to avoid the minutiae of the forced and oft-entitled/angry peer review.
4/8
Through the work and culture of infosec, I’ve developed an extremely keen eye for mistakes, errors, and systematic problems — and often fail to state how much I appreciate the value of someone’s work before criticizing it.
5/8
Yet what I’ve helped make has received so much kudos, & the process of making them has been so enjoyable & validating, that I feel I am “good enough” to release artwork for public sale & consumption under my own name — even if not at the level of a Kandinsky or Warhol.
6/8
Seeing the support and kindness people make the effort to express in the #NFTcommunity (within certain communities on Discord especially, shout-out to @itskay_k) has repeatedly shown me that there is another way, and not everyone is like this outside our weird little bubble.
7/8
I’d love for the infosec community to recognize how our overly-critical reactions to the work of others is often the opposite of encouragement, even if well-intentioned, and reduces opportunities for us to effectively learn from each other to improve our craft & culture ❤️
8/8
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Me in 2023: "If Millennials think we're having a hard time now, the madness & the chaos that would be unleashed in a 2nd Trump presidency would be unmatched by any other point in American history, & I think that none of us want to live through that"
You can see my eye twitching.
Anthony Davis: He knows he's 'Above the Law' and he kind of is.
Me: He kind of is. He kind of is. I mean, when you think about an equivalent, you could think about someone like Elon Musk.
Some stories wound me in the writing. The toll is a stress that burrows deep during research. When the weight grows unbearable, when it overwhelms, I step back, breathe, think. But I will not be ruled by fear. My allegiance is to democracy, and the stakes could not be higher.
The cunning of fear is that it needs no chains. It merely suggests that tomorrow is soon enough, that someone else will speak, and that the risk outweighs the duty. Fear stops the hand before it writes, and closes the throat before it speaks.
Fear is a thief of motion. It wins not by persuasion, but by paralysis. It whispers in our ear that stillness is safety, that silence protects. It makes cowards feel wise, inaction feel reasonable, retreat feel like strategy. So nothing moves. The moment passes, and passes again.
1/ People who believe Nicole Good was "in the wrong" for trying to drive away from a federal officer are telling us something important about themselves: they value compliance over justice.
That mindset isn’t just misguided. It’s fundamentally un-American. I can explain. 🧵👇
2/ America’s founding story wasn’t about obeying the rules, it was about challenging unjust ones. The Boston Tea Party and civil rights marches are examples of acts of defiance against oppressive power structures.
Justice has always preceded legality in our moral code.
3/ When you prioritize "following the rules" at all costs, you’re effectively saying power defines what’s right. But history shows the opposite: power often needs to be confronted to make things right.
Look, man. I was deployed to Iraq 2003-2004. Our unit leadership would provide us highly specific instructions on the Rules of Engagement for any given mission. If we were stepping outside the wire, there was a standing RoE, and we were briefed pre-mission. We knew to obey it.
My point is this: Yes, if you add a bunch of less-trained people to the force, there will be mistakes.
I believe this to be a convenient excuse which obscures reality which fails to account for the sheer number of violent incidents we are observing on American streets.
As an 18 year old brand new, freshly-minted Private, my unit could still trust me; and I could pretty much trust everyone in my unit not to violate the RoE. We had a notion of the consequences, and bloodthirst was not encouraged.
FACT: Sanctions are the most important method of global financial moderation to help keep us safe from the world's worst terrorists.
This key defensive tool is now converted to a weapon of state repression and censorship by Trump admin under false guise of defending free speech.
We're not just talking the regular ol' domestic state repression, either.
The sanctions list has just become a global cleaver to financially terminate Trump's political enemies who are not U.S. citizens nor residents. He seeks to antagonize his targets and send a public message.
The clear message being broadcasted is that opposing Trump or engaging in advocacy which runs counter to the ideology this administration is installing in the U.S. is likely to result in significant consequences.
The admin repeats this message of fear via every channel, daily.