Creating art which is then roundly enjoyed by others has helped me with perfectionism.
Intellectually, I know that ‘perfect is the enemy of good’.
Unfortunately, my standards for my own work are often far too high to encourage incremental progress & learning in public.
2/8
Part of the reason why I feel that way is because the security community is so frequently negatively judging. As this is the community I joined from a young age, it has molded my behavior to be far too constrained & limited — in direct opposition to the hacker ethos.
3/8
Judging the work of oneself & others to an extremely high (& often unattainable) standard reduces the likelihood that people in a given community will produce original work for the benefit of said community by releasing it publicly — even when such efforts are sorely needed
4/8
The community essentially molded my behavior to the point where I have refused to release original work in the security space.
Meaning: useful code/scripts. Methodologies. Process improvements. Updates to the state of the art in information security. Incremental progress.
3/8
I haven’t always felt the things I’ve created have been good enough to stand up to the intense scrutiny which comes from both being a woman and a human in this space — and even if they were, I wanted to avoid the minutiae of the forced and oft-entitled/angry peer review.
4/8
Through the work and culture of infosec, I’ve developed an extremely keen eye for mistakes, errors, and systematic problems — and often fail to state how much I appreciate the value of someone’s work before criticizing it.
5/8
Yet what I’ve helped make has received so much kudos, & the process of making them has been so enjoyable & validating, that I feel I am “good enough” to release artwork for public sale & consumption under my own name — even if not at the level of a Kandinsky or Warhol.
6/8
Seeing the support and kindness people make the effort to express in the #NFTcommunity (within certain communities on Discord especially, shout-out to @itskay_k) has repeatedly shown me that there is another way, and not everyone is like this outside our weird little bubble.
7/8
I’d love for the infosec community to recognize how our overly-critical reactions to the work of others is often the opposite of encouragement, even if well-intentioned, and reduces opportunities for us to effectively learn from each other to improve our craft & culture ❤️
8/8
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Crypto influencer Joe McCann — who I met once while engaged in a short-lived crypto project — is currently under widespread suspicion of murdering his fiancée, social media influencer Ashlee Jenae (Ashly Robinson). Here is a retweet made by McCann's ex-wife during their divorce.
Content Warning: DV
'
'
'
'
Allegedly, they fought; hotel management separated them into different rooms. The police in Tanzania say she was found in critical condition inside her wardrobe in her hotel room after hanging herself using a piece of cloth from her dress on April 9.
Police commander: Based on preliminary investigation, there is no evidence of a criminal act. The police do not currently have grounds to arrest or charge McCann, and “cannot take legal action or detain him under these circumstances.” mwananchi.co.tz/mw/zanzibar/po…
"The systematic combination of crusader ideology, restorationist symbolism, and anti-government themes creates a visual manifesto that advocates for religious warfare, revolutionary action [...], and military authority superseding civilian democratic institutions."
🚩🚩🚩 There are major red flags in this story about an "ex-spy" who helped stop Iran from building a nuclear weapon. It is a very interesting piece—and I love The New Yorker—but please don't buy stories about intelligence professionals hook, line, and sinker 🎣
Believing that a story relitigating the success of previous CIA operations against Iran's nuclear program in public at the exactly moment when we are engaged in kinetic action against those same facilities is simply biographical stretches credulity.
Chalker claims he hasn't made a penny since the Broidy coverage. But his quantum cryptography startup Qrypt is HQ'ed at 1 World Trade Center, signed a major tech integration with NVIDIA in March, and added a former CIA Senior Exec to its board last year.
1/8 🧵 Right now, PHANTOM WAKE is showing 16 ships behaving very suspiciously near the underwater cables that carry ~95% of the world's internet traffic. These detections happened in a 19-hour window across 4 different oceans. Clustering here very likely not a coincidence #OSINT
2/8 First, what ARE these cables?
They're fiber-optic cables laid on the seafloor connecting every continent. When you video call someone in Europe from the US, your data travels through one. There are about 500 of them worldwide, and they're shockingly easy to damage
3/8 Here's the dirty secret: Easiest way to cut one is to drag an anchor over it. Slow a ship down to almost zero knots directly above the cable, drop the anchor, and let it scrape. Almost impossible to prove it was intentional! Russia & China have done it repeatedly since 2022
Let's do the *actual math* on @ThisWillHold2's "irrefutable" Amendment 4 fraud claim because the numbers they cite are publicly available and tell a totally different story.
2/ They claim 6,371,645 R+D early votes "coincidentally" equals the 60% threshold for Amendment 4, which got 6,070,758 YES out of 10,619,137 votes cast. The actual 60% bar was 6,371,482.
Their magic number is off by ~163 votes from the threshold. That's their "irrefutable" math.
3/ @ThisWillHold2 says 6,371,645 was used as a ceiling so Amendment 4 would land exactly at 60%. But the real 60% threshold was 6,371,482, and Amendment 4 only got 6,070,758 YES. That is a 300,724 vote gap.
Do you want to know how I tweeted that we did the attack on the school before it was confirmed? 'Twas a strong hunch based on TikTok comments posted to videos showing immediate aftermath of the event, like, "that doesn't look like Iran" to confuse viewers and avoid attribution.
By the time the news started filtering out internationally, Hegseth already knew DoD had made a mistake, and (U.S. or Israeli) bots started covering for the crime pretty much immediately using the deescalation tactics I further describe in the linked thread above.
On X, the bots covering had an Israeli vibe based on profile content and feed (like this one below). In hindsight, they may have been sent to confuse attribution but seemed more concerned with avoiding the world thinking Israel had been the one to bomb the school.