Creating art which is then roundly enjoyed by others has helped me with perfectionism.
Intellectually, I know that ‘perfect is the enemy of good’.
Unfortunately, my standards for my own work are often far too high to encourage incremental progress & learning in public.
2/8
Part of the reason why I feel that way is because the security community is so frequently negatively judging. As this is the community I joined from a young age, it has molded my behavior to be far too constrained & limited — in direct opposition to the hacker ethos.
3/8
Judging the work of oneself & others to an extremely high (& often unattainable) standard reduces the likelihood that people in a given community will produce original work for the benefit of said community by releasing it publicly — even when such efforts are sorely needed
4/8
The community essentially molded my behavior to the point where I have refused to release original work in the security space.
Meaning: useful code/scripts. Methodologies. Process improvements. Updates to the state of the art in information security. Incremental progress.
3/8
I haven’t always felt the things I’ve created have been good enough to stand up to the intense scrutiny which comes from both being a woman and a human in this space — and even if they were, I wanted to avoid the minutiae of the forced and oft-entitled/angry peer review.
4/8
Through the work and culture of infosec, I’ve developed an extremely keen eye for mistakes, errors, and systematic problems — and often fail to state how much I appreciate the value of someone’s work before criticizing it.
5/8
Yet what I’ve helped make has received so much kudos, & the process of making them has been so enjoyable & validating, that I feel I am “good enough” to release artwork for public sale & consumption under my own name — even if not at the level of a Kandinsky or Warhol.
6/8
Seeing the support and kindness people make the effort to express in the #NFTcommunity (within certain communities on Discord especially, shout-out to @itskay_k) has repeatedly shown me that there is another way, and not everyone is like this outside our weird little bubble.
7/8
I’d love for the infosec community to recognize how our overly-critical reactions to the work of others is often the opposite of encouragement, even if well-intentioned, and reduces opportunities for us to effectively learn from each other to improve our craft & culture ❤️
8/8
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Let's do the *actual math* on @ThisWillHold2's "irrefutable" Amendment 4 fraud claim because the numbers they cite are publicly available and tell a totally different story.
2/ They claim 6,371,645 R+D early votes "coincidentally" equals the 60% threshold for Amendment 4, which got 6,070,758 YES out of 10,619,137 votes cast. The actual 60% bar was 6,371,482.
Their magic number is off by ~163 votes from the threshold. That's their "irrefutable" math.
3/ @ThisWillHold2 says 6,371,645 was used as a ceiling so Amendment 4 would land exactly at 60%. But the real 60% threshold was 6,371,482, and Amendment 4 only got 6,070,758 YES. That is a 300,724 vote gap.
Do you want to know how I tweeted that we did the attack on the school before it was confirmed? 'Twas a strong hunch based on TikTok comments posted to videos showing immediate aftermath of the event, like, "that doesn't look like Iran" to confuse viewers and avoid attribution.
By the time the news started filtering out internationally, Hegseth already knew DoD had made a mistake, and (U.S. or Israeli) bots started covering for the crime pretty much immediately using the deescalation tactics I further describe in the linked thread above.
On X, the bots covering had an Israeli vibe based on profile content and feed (like this one below). In hindsight, they may have been sent to confuse attribution but seemed more concerned with avoiding the world thinking Israel had been the one to bomb the school.
I have established that Donald Trump's statement of war against Iran which was broadcast in the wee hours of this morning is an AI deepfake.
1/🧵 How can we know it's a fake? 👀👇
2/ There is a complete absence of natural breathing patterns, spontaneous illustrators, or small fluctuations in Trump's facial musculature. His delivery remains highly monotonous in rhythm. Facial expressions are limited to rhythmic brow lowering and lip tightening and...
3/ ...lack natural spontaneous variation. His visual presentation shows a lack of natural breathing pauses or any of the shifts in weight that are typical of a live speech. Trump maintains a rigid, forward-facing posture with minimal body movement throughout.
"I am fully aware of the charges to which Ghislaine has been found guilty. Despite this fact, I continue to hold my sister in the highest regard."
"I am of course aware of the charges of which she has been found guilty at jury trial. I have been present at every ..." (Cont.) 👇
"... one of the pretrial and trial court days. Notwithstanding the jury's verdict, I continue to hold Ghislaine in the highest regard and I believe very strongly that she still has much of value to contribute in the world."
🤡 EFTA02838285.pdf
"I write this letter in support of my sister, Ghislaine, aware of the charges she was been found guilty of, noting too that she has no prior criminal convictions in any jurisdiction. ..." (Cont.)
BULLETIN: Those promoting the acronym "TND" are associated with Russia's Wagner Group. They are running rampant— Involved in child abuse via 764/Temple ov Blood, and have been working hard to radicalize (brainwash/abuse) trans youth into ?mass murdering others and themselves.
They also appear to have a woman deployed to perform narrative control on this topic. The goal is to ensure the public is not aware of the relationship between Russia and the child abuse conducted from afar.
Another related acronym is "DNB" (don't ask what it stands for). Note the original poster with a trans flag in bio. They actively hunt for vulnerable Western children.
2/🚩 The behavior described looks very similar to how powerful people are identified, studied, and slowly drawn into compromising relationships—
Especially through their close friends and family.
3/🚩 Warning signs can include the use of controlled romantic or sexual partners, mixing social access with business opportunities, and maintaining close contact with a known predator.