Creating art which is then roundly enjoyed by others has helped me with perfectionism.
Intellectually, I know that ‘perfect is the enemy of good’.
Unfortunately, my standards for my own work are often far too high to encourage incremental progress & learning in public.
2/8
Part of the reason why I feel that way is because the security community is so frequently negatively judging. As this is the community I joined from a young age, it has molded my behavior to be far too constrained & limited — in direct opposition to the hacker ethos.
3/8
Judging the work of oneself & others to an extremely high (& often unattainable) standard reduces the likelihood that people in a given community will produce original work for the benefit of said community by releasing it publicly — even when such efforts are sorely needed
4/8
The community essentially molded my behavior to the point where I have refused to release original work in the security space.
Meaning: useful code/scripts. Methodologies. Process improvements. Updates to the state of the art in information security. Incremental progress.
3/8
I haven’t always felt the things I’ve created have been good enough to stand up to the intense scrutiny which comes from both being a woman and a human in this space — and even if they were, I wanted to avoid the minutiae of the forced and oft-entitled/angry peer review.
4/8
Through the work and culture of infosec, I’ve developed an extremely keen eye for mistakes, errors, and systematic problems — and often fail to state how much I appreciate the value of someone’s work before criticizing it.
5/8
Yet what I’ve helped make has received so much kudos, & the process of making them has been so enjoyable & validating, that I feel I am “good enough” to release artwork for public sale & consumption under my own name — even if not at the level of a Kandinsky or Warhol.
6/8
Seeing the support and kindness people make the effort to express in the #NFTcommunity (within certain communities on Discord especially, shout-out to @itskay_k) has repeatedly shown me that there is another way, and not everyone is like this outside our weird little bubble.
7/8
I’d love for the infosec community to recognize how our overly-critical reactions to the work of others is often the opposite of encouragement, even if well-intentioned, and reduces opportunities for us to effectively learn from each other to improve our craft & culture ❤️
8/8
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I can tell you how they did it, because they tried to do it to me—
Be very careful with anyone new being joined to your Signal chats; be cautious with what you say in group chats where you don't explicitly know (IRL) and trust every member.
2/ They may try to use people of color to lure you in, or use some other commonality between you and their surveillance persona. They may appear on the surface to be genuine activists. Ask a lot of questions, act legally in your dealings, and follow your gut.
3/ I am not a lawyer. I suggest folks seek legal advice from a competent professional. But it stands to reason that if you follow the law, and distance yourself from those who don't intend to, you can keep your nose clean enough to avoid this type of risk
🚨 THREAD: NEW preprint paper by Cornell University researchers found that @elonmusk's @Grokipedia cited the white nationalist site VDare 107 times, the neo-Nazi site Stormfront 42 times, and the conspiracy site Infowars 34 times. 👀👇 1/🧵
#AdversarialML #AIethics
2/ Their analysis of over 880K articles revealed 12,522 citations to sources deemed low-credibility by academic research (3x higher than Wikipedia). They found ~5.5% of Grokipedia articles have citations to sources strictly blacklisted by the Wiki community for unreliability.
3/ Unlike Wikipedia's volunteer-based system, Grokipedia centralizes control through Elon Musk’s xAI.
Researchers identified 1,050 instances where Grokipedia cited AI conversations with the Grok chatbot as authoritative sources.
Legacy reporters ignored while the new MAGA-friendly press corps boasts of a direct hotline to officials. Access is now a reward for loyalty. The govt has created an information asymmetry where approved narratives get speed and access; critical inquiry gets the silent treatment.
New press badges have been issued to outlets linked to conspiracy theories and defamation. The official record of US military action is now curated by outlets prioritizing partisan activism over objective fact-finding. Conspiracy theories are entering the official briefing room.
We keep talking about "Russian hybrid warfare" but what we are facing is a deliberate pincer designed to break states without ever declaring war. Four blades close simultaneously: institutional capture, disinformation & psyops, legal attacks, and physical acts of sabotage. 1/🧵
2/ First axis: institutional capture.
Moscow cultivates political parties, media outlets, churches, business lobbies, and "cultural" fronts that gradually bend key nodes of our own systems toward Russian interests while retaining plausible deniability.
3/ This capture often runs through oligarch money, energy dependence, and elite networks rather than open ideology. Intelligence-linked orgs, "patriotic" NGOs, and Orthodox-aligned initiatives provide cover for recruitment, financing, and narrative shaping inside target states.
Alaska Airlines Flight 1282 revealed a deeper problem: Boeing couldn't identify who reinstalled the door plug that blew off mid-flight. The NTSB found no names, no records, no footage.
Similar gaps echo across other airlines and incidents. 🧵
The 737 MAX-9 lost its door plug minutes after takeoff. Nine passengers sustained minor injuries. Boeing admitted it had no record of who performed the door work. 25 unidentified personnel, overwritten video, missing oversight.
Heathrow, March 2023: a 777 returned for emergency inspection after an engine oil system anomaly; no casualties. Logs lacked technician IDs. Surveillance footage for the repair period was "lost" due to a storage error, preventing verification of who handled the engine system.
THREAD: The Trump admin is systematically defying federal court orders at an unprecedented rate. Of 165 cases where judges ruled against Trump, approximately 57 cases (35%) involved the administration defying, ignoring, or circumventing judicial orders.
1/🧵 Unroll at the end👇
VENEZUELAN DEPORTATIONS: Judge Boasberg found probable cause of criminal contempt in April when Trump deported alleged Tren de Aragua gang members w/o due process despite a restraining order. The admin hastily sent them to CECOT prison before they could contest removals in court.
ICE DETENTION: Trump repeatedly violated court orders requiring due process hearings for detained immigrants. Judge William H. Orrick issued directives that the admin circumvented thru procedural delays and maneuvers-denying detained people their constitutional right to hearings.