Creating art which is then roundly enjoyed by others has helped me with perfectionism.
Intellectually, I know that ‘perfect is the enemy of good’.
Unfortunately, my standards for my own work are often far too high to encourage incremental progress & learning in public.
2/8
Part of the reason why I feel that way is because the security community is so frequently negatively judging. As this is the community I joined from a young age, it has molded my behavior to be far too constrained & limited — in direct opposition to the hacker ethos.
3/8
Judging the work of oneself & others to an extremely high (& often unattainable) standard reduces the likelihood that people in a given community will produce original work for the benefit of said community by releasing it publicly — even when such efforts are sorely needed
4/8
The community essentially molded my behavior to the point where I have refused to release original work in the security space.
Meaning: useful code/scripts. Methodologies. Process improvements. Updates to the state of the art in information security. Incremental progress.
3/8
I haven’t always felt the things I’ve created have been good enough to stand up to the intense scrutiny which comes from both being a woman and a human in this space — and even if they were, I wanted to avoid the minutiae of the forced and oft-entitled/angry peer review.
4/8
Through the work and culture of infosec, I’ve developed an extremely keen eye for mistakes, errors, and systematic problems — and often fail to state how much I appreciate the value of someone’s work before criticizing it.
5/8
Yet what I’ve helped make has received so much kudos, & the process of making them has been so enjoyable & validating, that I feel I am “good enough” to release artwork for public sale & consumption under my own name — even if not at the level of a Kandinsky or Warhol.
6/8
Seeing the support and kindness people make the effort to express in the #NFTcommunity (within certain communities on Discord especially, shout-out to @itskay_k) has repeatedly shown me that there is another way, and not everyone is like this outside our weird little bubble.
7/8
I’d love for the infosec community to recognize how our overly-critical reactions to the work of others is often the opposite of encouragement, even if well-intentioned, and reduces opportunities for us to effectively learn from each other to improve our craft & culture ❤️
8/8
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨 NEW: I regret to inform the public the individual blocking @RepMaxineWaters @MaxwellFrostFL et. al lawful entrance to the Dept. of Education today appears to be Tobie Jansen van Rensburg, an offensive cybersecurity expert from South Africa who runs "Grey Owl Cyber Defense".
They wiped his face from PimEyes, but I still found him.
They are seeding disinformation, seen here possibly using the stolen identity of a Black man on Threads.
This works by seeding lies that aren't verifiable, yet appear highly passable at first blush.
David Fridie does exist, and did work at DoE, but has no Internet presence, including on LinkedIn, so it's impossible to verify without contacting him directly.
🧵 EXPLAINER: TRUMP'S EXECUTIVE ORDERS INCLUDING ENDING BIRTHRIGHT CITIZENSHIP/JUS SOLI
👀 This executive order aims to limit automatic birthright citizenship in the U.S. by reinterpreting the "subject to the jurisdiction thereof" clause of the 14th Amendment (DANGER!! THAT ONE PROVIDES EQUAL PROTECTION!!)
The order affects children born in the US after February 19, 2025 (30 days from the order's date) to two specific categories of parents:
1. Children born to mothers without legal status in the US and fathers who are neither US citizens nor permanent residents, 2. Children born to mothers with temporary legal status (like tourist or student visas) and fathers who are neither US citizens nor permanent residents.
Federal agencies including the State Dept, DoJ, DHS, and SSA will be required to:
- Stop issuing citizenship documentation to affected newborns
- Reject state or local documents claiming citizenship status for affected individuals
- Issue public guidance within 30 days explaining how they will implement these changes
The order applies these key limitations (FOR NOW!!!)
- Applies only to births occurring 30 days after the order's date
- Does not affect children of legal permanent residents
- Does not revoke existing citizenship for anyone born before the effective date
This executive order represents a seismic shift in how birthright citizenship has traditionally been interpreted and applied in the United States. It is already facing immediate legal challenges by ACLU and others, as it attempts to change a long-standing interpretation of the 14th Amendment through executive action rather than through legislation or constitutional amendment (WARNING! DICTATORSHIP AHEAD!!).
The practical implementation and enforcement of this order will depend on several factors, including:
- The response of state and local governments
- Legal challenges that may prevent or delay implementation
- The ability of federal agencies to verify parental status at the time of birth
- The capacity of agencies to implement new verification systems
Another order titled, "PROTECTING THE UNITED STATES FROM FOREIGN TERRORISTS AND OTHER NATIONAL SECURITY AND PUBLIC SAFETY THREATS" implements stricter vetting procedures for all foreign nationals, both those seeking entry and those already present in the United States. It requires continuous monitoring for security threats and establishes new standards for evaluating ideological alignment with American values and institutions.
That order states criteria for exclusion or removal includes individuals with "hostile attitudes" toward American institutions, which can easily be construed as including those who advocate for cultural or social changes deemed threatening to the administration.
BROADER IMPACT:
When viewed alongside the rescission order (INITIAL RESCISSIONS OF HARMFUL EXECUTIVE ORDERS AND ACTIONS) that eliminates numerous immigrant protection policies and the death penalty order's specific focus on crimes by non-citizens, these orders create a coordinated policy framework designed to:
- Prevent future unauthorized immigration through physical barriers and enforcement
- Identify and remove current unauthorized residents
- Eliminate programs and policies that provided humanitarian considerations
- Create severe consequences for violations
This comprehensive approach represents one of the most significant shifts in immigration policy and enforcement in U.S. history, and will fundamentally alter both future immigration patterns and the status of existing residents and citizens.
People in our country have a hard time facing inconvenient facts.
IMO, no leader is driving any effort that would change this outcome, as the People are kept ignorant, and have not demanded it. Believing otherwise is unwise, as there is no countering info to negate thus far.
Q: Why do the GOP and Kremlin bots slander Kamala Harris and other Dems as "Marxist"?
A: I can explain! First, a little context:
Social Murder is a term used to describe unnatural deaths caused by social, political, or economic oppression, rather than direct violence.
2/ Social murder is committed by the elites against the poor, sometimes through omission rather than commission, & results in deaths that may seem natural, but were actually preventable.
3/ Think: Opposition to Obamacare, opposition to protective measures against climate change and infectious disease, new tariffs, low corporate taxes, austerity measures, lobbying against environmental and safety regulations...