it's interesting to me that in the US, we're adding new apartments at the ground level of existing buildings - because in such poor foresight, this area was space for cars.
whereas in DE/AT - they're adding new apartments above the existing roof level, even in newer buildings.
existing buildings in europe also tend to be solid construction - so they can mostly withstand a lightweight addition, or only need a little structural work. this isn't the case for most of the US outside of a few dense places.
btw this is a killer app for mass timber due to its lightweight characteristics. prefabrication allowing for quick on site assembly means your building isn't exposed to elements for long, either.
and as cities continue to see growing demand, aufstockungen are a way to add new housing without increasing sealed area or changing the character of the neighborhood.
these units also tend to be lower cost than building new - as the infrastructure already exists. in some instances in vienna, these are social housing or baugruppen added to the existing building...
or market rate units at rooftop covers cost of adding elevator(s) or the energetic retrofit. this is part of the 'soft urban renewal' vienna does, in order to bring up buildings in gentrifying areas. also can reduce energy consumption by over 80% schoeberlpoell.at/de/projekte/fo…
this one is a baugruppe that was a block from where we stayed in vienna when we were at the passivhaus conference. had no idea it was there. amazing light, views... www10.aeccafe.com/blogs/arch-sho…
it's nearly impossible to add new units to roof of existing wood-framed buildings in seattle, which are majority of buildings outside the historic core.
seismic, energy code and sprinkler upgrades req'd are budget busters. and then there's the issue of 2 means of egress
they're such an incredible strategy for re-compacting cities.
but they're not really feasible without good 'urbanism' bones.
more on aufstockungen in this piece i wrote for the @UrbanistOrg 7 years ago:
oh and you can absolutely add stuff like this onto existing non-residential buildings as well...
BIG's transitlager in basel is housing built over an existing warehouse that was rehab'd to retail and office space. no double loaded corridor, either!
we even have some in seattle. this one (10) 1-BR/1 Bath, 450-560 sf condos on what are 2 parcels. built in 1917, this project predates 1923 zoning ordinance. recent units sold for $450k. whole dev is ~$4.5M today
you'll be shocked to find these were downzoned to single family.
it was *exactly* these types of projects that zoning was introduced to stop the spread of.
here's a pro-zoning poster from seattle from 1922- - when the zoning ordinance was being written/edited by apartment-hating, car loving, exclusionary zoning devotee harland bartholomew
so a few months ago, i was interviewed by @Quicktake for a documentary on social housing in vienna.
vienna is doing so many things right on housing, on climate, on transportation, and on land use.
we should follow suit.
enjoy!
4 years ago over on @CityObs i wrote about housing lessons seattle and other cities in the US should take from vienna, after visiting for the passivhaus conference in 2017.
'our zoning, our lack of vision and leadership, our lack of comprehensive planning, our lack of innovation, and most importantly, our lack of funding make such a model difficult'