Dr. Lacy Hunt doesn't care for the consensus regarding inflation, a thread:
US Debt has eroded Real Per Capita GDP. The action by the Fed and Treasury in 2020-2021 hasn't changed that.
M2 money growth did happen due to the combination of Fiscal and Monetary policy, however, that increase in M2 money stock HAS NOT created persistent inflation.
Fed Reserves aren't money and don't leave the financial markets. Fed moves old debt onto its balance sheet.
The Fed HOPES that moving old debt onto its balance sheet will create new debt creation in the private economy, but M2 money growth is falling (total M2 remains high, but the rate of growth fell in Q3 and will continue to fall).
Fiscal and Monetary policy HAS NOT lead to more economic activity. The Spike in M2 has lead to a DECREASE in velocity of money - indicating that the Debt IS NOT productive. There isn't an increase in gross national income to cover principle and interest on the existing debt.
Unproductive debt erodes economic growth. Further, the debt has left the banks in a state of "disrepair."
The falling Loan to Deposit ratio indicates extreme uncertainty by both lenders and consumers. More people holding money and banks not lending.
Dr. Hunt looks to @AtlantaFed and its GDP projections. Although inventories are up, actual sales are flat AND if you believe CPI numbers, then producers are sliding. The services sector can't be the whole recovery. Manufacturing tells us that growth is flat or slightly negative.
At the 33:30 of the video in the first tweet asks Dr. Hunt isn't the consensus opinion to take on more debt? Hunt responds with a Margret Thatcher quote regarding consensus: blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpol…
Dr. Hunt then recounts that the "consensus" has been telling him that rates were going to go up STARTING IN 1990.
"Trying to understand the consensus or to get agreement from the consensus in my opinion is an absolute waste of time."
Now, every NEW DOLLAR OF DEBT there is only 20 cent increase in GDP.
Thats negative people. Monetary policy's power right now is frustrated and temporary. The more debt encouraged by the Fed via QE and the more ACTUAL debt created by treasury will do LESS AND LESS over time.
Not surprisingly Dr. Hunt is still Long Bond bullish.
He still doesn't care for the "consensus."
Whether that is the "old wall," the fancy math of Quants, crypto hippies, or tech hopefuls.
Until there is a deleverage OR there is a new system that bypasses debt and goes to direct money printing, this chart below is all that matters in the long haul.
/fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The purpose of the stress test is to determine
"...whether bank holding companies and U.S. intermediate holding companies with $100 billion or more in total consolidated assets are sufficiently capitalized to absorb losses during a hypothetical recession...
2/9
...ensuring that they can continue to be able to lend to households and businesses."
What does it mean for a bank to be "sufficiently capitalized" you ask? Well, it means the difference between a bank's liabilities (what banks owe)...
3/9
I had a great time listening to @GeorgeGammon and @SantiagoAuFund most recent conversation regarding the Dollar, Dollar Milkshake, and inflation/deflation.
A few quick thoughts and comments on my part.
1/18
The Dollar Milkshake theory is right. The central idea is the dollar (world reserve currency) will remain strong relative to other currencies for a long time UNTIL it will spike and go REALLY high. This will draw money into US equities and Gold.
2/18
Recently (June 2020 to the present) the dollar has weakened. This has lead some (@HedgeyeTV being the principal voices on twitter lately) to make fun of Brent as being wrong or old or dumb or something.
I believe this is a critical observation to incorporate into policy and commercial decision making. From the report:
"The low in inflation occurred after all of the past four recessions...
2/25
"...The low in inflation occurred after all of the past four recessions, with an average lag of almost fifteen quarters from the end of the recessions."
This is an empirical claim that is either true or false. Other economists like @EconguyRosie have confirmed...
Mike: 'You alluded to this earlier. We saw high yield and IG CDS, are the spreads between rates and corporate credit, collapse much more quickly than we saw on the equity side...
2/12
...We obviously know the Fed played a direct role in that by stepping forward and as you pointed out, supporting it, but what are the implications of that dynamic? How does that create opportunity, or does that push us further towards the ultimate Minsky moment?"
"As a result of the deteriorating increase in our standard of living, we have caused not just in the United States, but globally, a major deterioration in the demographics during this period of high indebtedness."
-Lacy Hunt
2/13
I had never connected Federal Reserve and Treasury policies having a DIRECT effect on demographic deterioration.
"And what effect this would have long term on home
ownership rates, on headship rates, on household formation."