The decision to justify your conclusion over the 2014 war data specifically is a giant flaw in of itself. In a proper analysis the paper would look to see if the iron dome succeeded in changing the way Israel responded to rocket attacks from Gaza.
To choose the only war out of the 3 (not 4)* after iron dome deployment, where the abduction and murder of Jewish teenagers were clearly an important factor in shaping the Israeli response, is dishonest at best.
2/
This would have been monumentally apparent if you had actually included most obvious piece of data required for this analysis. The number of rockets launched from Gaza during each of these wars are oddly missing.
3/
How can you possibly analyze if the Israeli response was less harsh, the same, or more harsh after deployment of the iron dome if you don’t have the numbers of the very thing it was designed to help combat? So I added them for you; numbers provided by the IDF.
4/
How you managed to create an entire analysis without that crucial piece of information still eludes me. The wars in 2012 and 2021 show a drastic increase in the rockets launched from Gaza on average *per day* in relation to the wars which directly preceded them.
5/
Simultaneously, the Palestinian casualty numbers are significantly lower. Try as you might you won’t be able to rationalize how Israel doesn’t wind up with 2 more ground ops while dealing with hundreds of rockets daily in 2012 and 2021 without the iron dome.
6/
Worth noting the chart doesn’t include the countless times a rocket or two gets sent over as a 9pm gift, or when rockets get shot towards tel aviv because “lighting struck it”, or the escalations that don’t get called an “operation” like in May 3-6, 2019.
7/
As an added bonus I happened to stumble across another problematic aspect of this analysis while double checking the numbers provided. Imagine my shock to find out our old friend the UN is up to some interesting shenanigans with their data again.
8/
Khaled states the data are UN figures. The percentage of civilian casualties (75%) is coincidentally the exact same percentage UNOCHA (which is based in Gaza) declared back on July 28, 2014; almost a month before the war even ended.
9/
What are the odds the percentage miraculously stayed the same? To be clear this is a UN office. The same UN who loves to claim their offices in Gaza are not influenced by Hamas, even after an UNRWA school was found to have a tunnel underneath it this year, yet again.
10/
In June 2015 the UN Human Rights Council published the findings of the independent commission of inquiry they had sent to Gaza. Here are the Palestinian casualty totals from that report next to numbers Khaled chose to use from UNOCHA:
11/
Same total casualties but 232 fewer civilian casualties than what’s currently listed on UNOCHA website. To put it in perspective the disparity is close to the *total* number of casualties in Gaza during the war in May of this year.
12/
These numbers drop the percentage of civilian casualties from the war to 65%. But wait, there’s more! In 2016 B’tselem published their own report on the war:
13/
Both the total casualties and the civilian casualties are lower than either of the first two reports and the percentage of civilian casualties decreases to 63%.
Look, I never expected Khaled to start citing Israeli Foreign Ministry numbers (56%), or account for the mass executions by Hamas at the same time, or the failed rockets who hit their own population, but did he really need to choose the one that’s so blatantly inaccurate?
15/
Lastly, imagine trying make this comparison with a straight face. Obviously the civilian percentage on the Israeli end would be low in a war that involved a ground op. Congrats! Hopefully next time you don’t fall for wildly inflated numbers.
16/
While we send our soldiers to the front lines Hamas militants head to the tunnels. It’s not because of hamas’ care to avoid civilians that percentage exists, they shot over 4 thousand rockets at us after all, it’s because of the IDF and Iron Dome.
17/
When Hamas had the ability to pick their targets, with devastating accuracy, they didn’t primarily target military bases or checkpoints. They primarily targeted public busses, restaurants, cafes, shopping malls, nightclubs etc.
18/
For what it’s worth I dislike the argument as well. It’s probably the only thing we’d agree on here, even if it’s for different reasons. There’s no need to create false conclusions though just because you don’t like something.
End/
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Umbrella terms like Ashkenazi, Sephardi, and Mizrahi, which literally signify geographical regions, should not be confused with what nusach someone follows. Even Yemenite Jewry can be considered an umbrella term as within you had Adeni Jews, Habbani Jews, Sana’ani Jews etc.
1/
*Some* of the unique differences that each of those communities had were developed as a result of where their communities were located in Yemen rather than being impacted by which tiklal (siddur) they used.
2/
A Yemeni Jew who follows a largely Sephardic nusach (shami) did not simultaneously adopt the history and lived experiences of Sephardic Jews and their ancestors. Their history didn’t involve being exiled from the Iberian Peninsula in the late 15th century.
3/
Phenomenal video of Yemeni Jewish poems that were written in the 16th and 17th centuries sung by Israeli Yemeni Jews. There are no English captions unfortunately for those who don’t speak Hebrew, however, I’ll add a few interesting bits of info below with the link at the end
1/
There are 18 poems in the entire 50 minute video. I’ve mentioned in the past that Shalom Shabazi is regarded as the poet of Yemen. 10 out of the 18 poems here are written by him, including the one in the clip from the first tweet.
2/
Another extremely well known figure who wrote the poem in this clip is Zechariah Dhahiri. He was one of the primary reasons for Kabbalah reaching Yemen as he travelled to the land of Israel and visited Yosef Karo’s Yeshiva.
Maybe comparing Mizrahi Jews to Trump voters isn’t exactly the best idea. Especially not if you’re trying to convince us we’re wrong in our perspective. This article also misses a lot of points regarding why Mizrahi Jews have zero trust in the left.
The socialist elite class were those who looked down at us and our traditions as “backwards.” They also have a habit of talking to us like they know what’s best for us, instead of actually listening to us and having constructive dialogue.
Also yes there is some racism too, I just last week dealt with a racist Israeli on the left who not only called all Mizrahi Jews liars, compared our grievances to fake news circulated by Qanon groups in the US, while referring to us as Arabs.
3/
Today is #JewishRefugeeDay where we remember the 850,000 Jewish refugees from the MENA region forced to flee after Israel won the war for its independence. In Yemen 16,000 Yemeni Jews were already in the camp set up near Aden by the time approval was given for their evacuation.
Once word got out that they were allowed to leave many Yemeni Jews dropped everything, took what they could and made the dangerous trek (largely by foot) towards Aden where evacuation was approved. Between June 1949-September 1950 over 350 flights helped rescue nearly 50k Jews.
Many died due to disease, starvation, and even attacks by robbers along the way to Aden. Even though they still experienced hardship in the early years inside Israel, with a few families even leaving back to Yemen (before civil war broke out), most deeply appreciated the help.
Since this is gaining traction it’s worthwhile to point out another document worth reading through thoroughly. Ben Gurion’s testimony to the UN in 1947.
“I understand the Arab case and I fully realize it. It is very simple. They state they do not care what happened, and nobody ought to care what happened fifteen hundred or two thousand years ago. We are here...”
2/
“Not one but many nations in the world did not accept that claim because they were faced with a unique case which is not as simple as that...the entire civilized world said that while the Arabs were liberated in various territories there was room for the Jews in Palestine.”
3/
Jews are always told how they should identify and what part of the identity they need to remove in order to be viewed as equal while as a diaspora. First it was change/drop your “religion”, then it was keep your “religion” but drop your national identity (peoplehood). 1/
It never worked and all it does is create a “picking and choosing” of our identity to define us when it really should be viewed as a full package. A package that involves shared history, language, traditions etc. with minor variations in each due to being a diaspora. 2/
Our people is much easier understood when viewed through the lens of a tribe where “conversions” are essentially a right of passage into the tribe; a path to “citizenship” in the modern perspective. 3/