THE INVISIBLE HAND OF THE MARKET until consumer preferences increasingly turn towards social justice-oriented themes and then we've got to shut the whole thing down
I love the GOP's assumption that corporations are choosing "woke" marketing & making "woke" products b/c CEOs want to push an agenda. In reality, younger consumers are more diverse & progressive. It is *much* more profitable to cater to their preferences
That's the market, baby
I know Republicans must mourn the days when the majority of U.S. consumers had racist preferences so Black people were virtually invisible from film, advertising, etc
But, uh oh!, younger Americans are barely majority white. So what does the market do?
Adapt to the audience
What was one of the most profitable horror films of the past decade? Get Out. An allegory about racism. But maybe that was just an outlier. I'm sure a superhero movie named after a Black Power movement w/ a plot that highlights Black identity would totally flop at the box office
Oh, & where does the future of marketing lie? Social media. Our society systemically oppresses Black people. On twitter, tho, Black people have enormous power. Research has shown that tweets sent by members of Black Twitter get exponentially more engagement. The market responds!
In any case, the GOP has never been "pro-market." Their policies hinder markets' functionality. They're pro-profit & unregulated-capitalism & they call this "pro-market." Now that the market is responding to the new consumer preference of "wokeness!," the GOP is having a meltdown
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I'm reaching new levels of frustration with our media. I do not believe people have been properly informed by the press about the Human Infrastructure package. This has real consequences for civic engagement in our country.
I'm not saying the media has to cheerlead. But I am asking whether Americans would have the same view of Biden if they knew what he was proposing. If they would be more engaged with the passage of the bill. If Dems risk losing in the midterms b/c the objective stakes are unstated
Maybe voters would learn about the bill and still feel unsatisfied! That would be disappointing to me as a Democrat but, at least in that case, people would be making informed decisions about legislative agendas. Not just feeling "meh" based on fogs & shadows.
The thing about white people mimicking AAVE is that Black people have asked them not to do it & that should be the end of the discussion. I could give a long description of the harms of appropriation but I feel like, "Black people have said please don't do this" should be enough
And spare me comments about "it's just language change." If my only contact with British people was watching British TV & then I turned around & was like, "ALLO MATE. Was at the pub and this bloody wanker took the piss right out of me!" it would not be a case of "language change"
Yes there are dialects of English spoken by non-Black people that have come into contact w/ AAVE & naturally incorporated some features. That's different than white people imitating the dialect & being so disfluent it sounds like they've never actually been around AAVE speakers
I've seen some Dems spreading rumors about the many Haitian refugees from the Southern border. There is no conspiracy. These refugees were in South/Central America after the 2010 earthquake. 2021 policy that Haitians that were already here could stay longer was misinterpreted
Haiti is a country that has been thru hell & back thousands of times over centuries. Even just within the past 10 years: earthquakes, political turmoil, extreme weather. Still being punished for being a state founded by freed slaves. That's why there are a lot of Haitian refugees
2010 earthquake sent many fleeing to Central/South America, but that doesn't mean that those countries were welcoming or offered great quality of life. These same refugees heard of the 2021 status extension for migrants already in the US & are now risking their lives to get here
I wish this story had been better framed, so we could understand what the actual policy is & critique it on its merits. It's very possible that the migrant center at Guantanamo Bay is worthy of real critique, but people hear "Gitmo" & immediately think of the extrajudicial prison
I'm not defending the policy, to be clear. I'm saying we need to understand what it actually is in order to advocate for Haitian refugees. The migrant center at Guantanamo has long been used to house people intercepted at sea. So what are the current conditions at that center?
I don't know what NBC's intention was, but this point is correct. It shouldn't have been spun as deportation from the Southern border. Nor should it have been spun as novel.
I agree w/ @QueenMab87. For my own part, I'll add: I understand why it would be jarring to see the tragic case of a murdered woman used as a point of contrast. I also think we should ask, when, exactly, we would prefer people of color to call out the clear disparities in coverage
I mean, do we want indigenous and Black women to wait a few weeks or to never compare how their stories are told to how the stories of white victims are told? Is that what we're asking? This seems wrong. If the contrast seems harsh to us, that's b/c a harsh reality demands it.
It's not an easy convo. There is a victim that we don't want to erase. But, again, as uncomfortable as it might be at times, WOC have a legitimate criticism of how these events are covered. & there's not a "better time" to make these criticisms than when the disparity is clearest
The rise in the murder rate in 2020 was very real & should be examined. However, murder rates are also very volatile. Discerning a trend is impossible at this point. There were *many* factors that could have made 2020 an outlier. Also, beware being misled by % increase/decrease.
% increase/decrease can be misleading for many reasons. The murder rate in the 70s/80s was very high overall, so the graph will show small fluctuations relative to a very high baseline. Murder rate in the last decade was relatively low This makes 2020 look worse than the 70's/80s
Another reason % increase/decrease is misleading in year-to-year comparisons is that murder, tho too common in the U.S., is a statistically rare event. Numerically small changes in statistically rare events can lead to enormous % changes that are not meaningful in the long term