"immigration crisis" news cycle gave us all the useless liberal tropes

1. Witness suffering and feeling bad about it while carrying out mass deportation anyway.
2. all the right humanitarian, anti-racist rhetoric front-loading... carrying out mass deportation anyway.
3. Optics!
a kinder, gentler deportation hand
when your ideology starts from a position of "what looks bad" rather than what is actually bad, your policy output will necessary be a meta one, focusing on what shows up on the evening news and NYT editorial board, irrespective of how your policies impact vulnerable populations.
the goal from the Biden WH and DHS from the beginning was to handle the **visual** of the immigrants corralled at the border. Just as mayors want to handle the **visual** of homeless people in public spaces. It's first and foremost about Making Things Look Good
and a central part of Making Things Look Good is assuring squishy liberals that when you are "forced" to deport immigrants or "clean out" homeless camps that when you do so you Feel Very Bad about it. And that your means will be marginally more humane than the other guys'
This is the way of liberalism today. See, for example, this WaPo editorial that a did next level cynicism: it criticized Biden for NOT CRACKING DOWN ENOUGH on Central American migrants then went on to accuse Biden of engaging in a racist double standard washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/… ImageImageImage
to clarify, WaPo is accusing Biden of not cracking down on Central American migrants as hard as he has Haitian migrants (a fair point in its own right) but then, their solution, is to EQUALLY CRACKDOWN ON BOTH POPULATIONS. Brutally purge immigrants just don't be racist about it
In an editorial lobbying for Biden to not "incentivize" migrants coming to the border (read: stick with strict enforcement of Operation Gatekeeper's strategy of making the trek so violent and brutal it dissuades migrants from coming) they accused Biden of racism. Nothing matters.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Adam H. Johnson

Adam H. Johnson Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @adamjohnsonNYC

28 Sep
hey all, this will be a carnival barking thread so feel free to ignore. A month ago I started a substack with contributions from @sarahlazare. In that month we have published 14 articles that I think are pretty good. I'll be posting a few here for you to read (or ignore)
We kicked it off with a breakdown of NYT reporter Peter Baker relying on an (undisclosed) Raytheon board member to criticize Biden's Afghanistan military withdrawal. thecolumn.substack.com/p/on-afghanist…
Then a criticism of the media's habit of likening all bad things to Primitive Foreigners Over There thecolumn.substack.com/p/texas-taliba…
Read 11 tweets
27 Sep
These metrics are totally meaningless bordering on made up. These figures are prearranged or pre-announced “charity” provided by the global north & major drivers of poverty—IMF, World Bank, EU & Bill Gates—they were going to “give away” anyway (see here:
devex.com/news/donors-qu…)
Once again, Global Citizen has little to say about exploitive IMF loans, environmental destruction & anti-labor “trade deals” pushed by multinational corporations, blocking TRIPS waiver by EU & a host of other forces afflicting the global poor—Just more vapid PR for the powerful
A major donor to this program is Amazon, one of the most environmentally destructive forces on earth. What does any of this mean? What does it mean to “pledge” to grow a tree? How are these pledges enforceable? Image
Read 8 tweets
24 Sep
the runaway bourgeois morality of schmaltzy underdog sports movies is such a potent ideological drug. Watching the Kurt Warner grocery-bagger-to-Super Bowl champion trailer I'm reminded of 'Sugar' (2008) which brilliantly subverted the genre and no one ever saw it.
growing up my father would constantly reference Rudy (1993), without irony, as some type of moral guide. A deeply reactionary movie that is also extremely moving and good at convincing poor whites the highest moral order is getting your head bashed in nonstop and not complaining
the big lesson at the end is Charles S Dutton regretting he complained too much about racism in the 1930s!
Read 4 tweets
7 Sep
Only you can stop bathroom time abuse, a real thing normal humans should care about
abuse more generous bathroom time
abuse

more

generous

bathroom

time
Read 4 tweets
7 Sep
Dem leadership & WH put up zero fight to defend the greatest of transfer of wealth to the poor in 50yrs, proven to reduce poverty & hunger. This explains why they never talked about it. They end up 100% on the side of big business & it’ll cost them in 2022 nytimes.com/2021/09/06/bus…
Program existed, was working and was more popular than Jesus and democratic leadership basically never mentioned it and have acted embarrassed about it since day one
Biden and many dem governors are still living in May 2021 when everyone thought we were about to “go back to normal,” but reality didn’t bear this out so the plan is just to stick to the ra ra “we’re back” narrative despite all that’s happening with delta.
Read 8 tweets
6 Sep
yeah one thing we should've touched on in the piece is the contemporary stakes at work: erasing radicals from labor history and retconning liberal reformers as the primary drivers of progress serves to reinforce a similar framework on how people perceive how change happens today
This isn't to say radical elements––then or now––are beyond criticism but the left-punching, vote-shaming, respectability politics that makes up a great deal of contemporary liberal conventional wisdom is largely informed by a warped view of how progress was made, historically.
specifically the stripping of political labels in many pop histories is of interest to me. The removal of anarchism from our histories of turn-of-the-century radical unionism; the erasure of communism from histories of the BPP. We are uniquely scared of -isms which I find curious
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(