The Kremlin has taken advantage of an acute global gas shortage to weaponize flows to Europe, warns Ukraine’s gas king.
by AEP
telegraph.co.uk/business/2021/…
Yuriy Vitrenko (head of the Ukrainian energy and pipeline nexus Naftogaz) warns that the geopolitics of the European escalating gas war with Russia are intractable. The coming supply crunch is likely to force brutal demand destruction in industry and homes.
The Kremlin has taken advantage of an acute global gas shortage to weaponise flows to Europe. But, according to him, a Western capitulation to Putin’s gas blackmail would embolden Russia to launch a full-scale war on former Soviet territory.
“Last year Gazprom booked 65bcm (billion cubic metres) of transit through Ukraine and this year it is only 40bcm. That’s why you are not getting your 25bcm of gas. It’s as easy as that,” he told The Daily Telegraph.
The alleged aim is to force German regulators to nod through a “quick and dirty” approval of the ultra-political Nord Stream 2 pipeline; or failing that, to secure emergency “pre-certification” flows, which establish an irreversible dependency on the new Baltic route.
Both options deprive Ukraine and Poland of self-defence leverage changing the balance of power in Europe. “They had planned to ship 25bcm through Nord Stream 2 and didn’t expect it to be held up. They are withholding the gas. If that is not a gas war, I don’t know what is”.
The UK is just as exposed as the rest of Europe even though it buys very little gas directly from Russia. “We have an integrated European gas market. Russian gas that goes to Germany can go on to the UK. Prices are the same and they go up for the entire European market together”. Image
“Nord Stream 2 is clearly not compliant with the letter and spirit of EU rules so they need to put pressure on the regulator, basically the German authorities. But it is part of a bigger geopolitical game: Putin is testing the Biden administration too” said Mr Vitrenko.
Gazprom supplied normal volumes to Europe over the first half of 2021 but that was not enough to prevent stocks from falling to drastically low levels following a wet, cold spring and the V-shaped economic recovery that caught forecasters off-guard.
Flows through the Ukraine pipeline system then dropped abruptly at the end of June, just at the moment when surging East Asian and Chinese demand was soaking up the global supply of liquefied natural gas.
Gazprom has since been delivering basic contract volumes but not the usual season top-up flows. It booked almost no extra capacity for Jul, Aug, Sept, and Oct. It has booked minimal amounts through the Polish Yamal pipeline, another twist that is seriously alarming markets.
Gazprom says it has made up much of the shortfall to Europe with extra flows through the southern Turk Stream pipeline, which opened last year. Whether this comes close to compensating is hotly disputed.
Vitrenko says Russia was emboldened when Biden overrode Congress sanctions against Nord Stream 2 and agreed to a fig-leaf deal with Merkel that gave Moscow what it wanted. “It was as a chance to increase pressure. Right after they started to withhold gas and prices sky-rocketed”.
Mr Biden was arguably playing the “reverse Kissinger” card, hoping to dial down tensions with Moscow and head off a deeper strategic alliance between Vladimir Putin and China’s Xi Jinping. But the accord has been decried as a latter-day Yalta that throws Ukraine to the wolves.
Gazprom has made clear that Europe’s gas woes could end quickly if Nord Stream 2 is given the green light. Export chief Elena Burmistrova says the company “would be able to cover additional demand” once certification goes through. Kremlin officials have made similar noises. Image
Mr Vitrenko warned that giving in to energy blackmail would be to trade an immediate fuel crisis for an even bigger geopolitical crisis down the road. “If there are no longer any physical flows through Ukraine there will be a full-scale war between Ukraine and Russia,” he said.
Once Putin is able to ship all his export gas to Europe via Nord Stream and other pipelines under his control, there will no longer be a deterrent. “Russia has a myriad of opportunities to provoke a war: by controlling separatists in the Donbas; or by creating a water supply ...
... crisis in Crimea, and claiming that it is intervening to prevent a humanitarian catastrophe. If there is a war we’re afraid that all we’ll hear from European politicians are expressions of deep concern but Russia is not afraid of deep concerns” he said.
Counter-pressure is building. MEPs have called on the EU to investigate Gazprom for price manipulation. The Inter. Energy Agency (IEA) has issued a rare statement saying Russia “could do more to increase gas availability to Europe” to keep its reputation as a “reliable supplier”.
Not everyone agrees that Gazprom can produce more gas quickly after running down investment in drilling and exploration. The old Cenomanian fields of Western Siberia dating back to the 1970s are in terminal decline.
“Gazprom is firing on all cylinders to satisfy growing demand at home and abroad,” said Vitaly Yermakov from the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. “It cannot wave a magic wand and deliver extra gas to any place in Europe that requires it on short notice.
No matter how hard Gazprom tries, it cannot single-handedly balance such a huge market as Europe”. Russia needs to refill its own depleted inventories. Stocks were just 25bcm in late June, far short of the 75bcm deemed the safe threshold for the long winter.
Mr Yermakov says the whole structure of Russia’s industry is changing as the centre of gravity moves to new Arctic fields in the Yamal Peninsula. More gas is earmarked for Asia. Russia cannot quickly replace the 40bcm slide in Dutch output over the last five years.
It makes sense for Gazprom to supply Europe through the Baltic route rather than through leaky Soviet infrastructure with extra transit fees in Ukrainian. This transition creates a mismatch: the old Soviet system in decay, the new Yamal system not yet fully up and running.
Expert opinion is split. Most analysts agree with the IEA: Russia has been playing games with gas supply. “They could easily have pushed another 5bcm so far this year via Ukraine,” said Prof Thierry Bros, former gas strategist at the French economy ministry now at Sciences Po.
Prof Bros said storage in Europe would still be low but at least within historical bands, eliminating some of the panic driving gas prices. Vitrenko said the argument that Gazprom cannot produce more contradicts the stated rationale for the Baltic pipeline. Image
“If that were the case, you wouldn’t need Nord Stream 2 at all. Russia can easily ramp up production, not overnight perhaps, but I can remember times when daily flows through Ukraine were three times as much,” he said.
No major European state is likely to take Moscow’s word at face value after the invasion of Crimea. Gazprom has long served as an instrument of Kremlin geostrategy. The new Turk Stream infrastructure has dual military usage, with a sonar surveillance system installed.
Many in Europe clearly wish to secure gas whatever the political price. They are pushing for immediate pre-certification flows through Nord Stream 2 before the industrial core of the Ruhr Valley starts to shut down, and aborts the economic recovery.
But events in Washington have again intruded. The US House of Rep passed a fresh amendment demanding the reimposition of sanctions. If the Senate follows suit, the White House may be forced to act. “No one will buy gas from Gazprom going through Nord Stream 2,” said Vitrenko.
Vitrenko said the mix of tightening US policy, a Polish legal challenge within the EU and Mr Putin’s behaviour are all now conspiring to block the pipeline for the foreseeable future. The Greens may soon be in the German government. They want to axe Nord Stream 2 altogether.
“It’s now very unlikely to happen. German regulators know it would just be too noticeable. They have a rule of law in their country, and others do care, so they can’t just ignore it,” he said.
It could be a long painful winter for Europe and the UK. Utilities are turning frantically to biomass, booster compressor stations, and coal where they can, and potentially even to oil substitution in power plants. “Everything comes into play at these prices,” said Vitrenko.
There may have to be price rationing. “Many industries are just switching off. Households adjust their consumption. They’ll be emergency measures by European governments,” said Vitrenko. How long will this stand-off last? “I don’t know. It is difficult to predict Mr Putin”.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Zoe Keller

Zoe Keller Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @KellerZoe

28 Sep
China's crunch will rock the whole world. China demand is already wilting and that's the cure for high energy prices.
by AEP
telegraph.co.uk/business/2021/…
China’s energy crunch is happening for much the same reasons as in Europe. Covid upset the rhythms of the global fuel market. The weather was extreme: drought hit hydro-power. The hot summer boosted air conditioning. The result was an explosion in demand for coal and gas. Image
The cost of LNG (Liquefied Natural Gas) in Shanghai reached $26 MBBtu, luring away shipments to Europe's depleted inventories. China is now the world’s biggest LNG importer: in Aug it bought 6.4m tonnes (compared to 4.9m by Europe + Turkey combined). Image
Read 25 tweets
14 Jun
#NIProtocol
Macron: that Boris Johnson was “well aware” of “incoherences” in the Northern Ireland Protocol when he signed up to it (which is an implicit admission that the NIP is a logical mess).
telegraph.co.uk/politics/2021/…
What incoherences? The NIP states that NI is an integral part of the UK Customs territory (art 4) and of the UK internal market (art 6). So, why do we hear about a (customs and/or regulatory) border on the Irish Sea? Why does Macron say NI is not fully a part of the UK?
Because other NIP provisions are — in effect — inconsistent with the two principles set out above, as they require NI to apply some EU Sigle Market rules and the UK to apply customs checks (EU Customs Code) to goods moving from GB to NI "at-risk" of end up into the EU.
Read 9 tweets
13 Jun
We cannot stand for the EU's attempt to partition the UK. A damaging Protocol that alters the constitutional position of Northern Ireland is unacceptable.
— Vernon Bogdanor
telegraph.co.uk/politics/2021/…
The dispute over the Northern Ireland Protocol is about more than sausages. It concerns the right of the people of Northern Ireland to self-determination. Some in the EU appear to believe that NI is not fully a part of the United Kingdom. It is.
In December 1921, the Anglo-Irish Treaty recognised the right of self-determination of 26 counties in the island of Ireland to secede from the United Kingdom. Northern Ireland then exercised her own right of self-determination by deciding to remain a part of the United Kingdom.
Read 11 tweets
13 Jun
The EU see the NI Protocol as a way to keep the UK close to their regulatory orbit and won't become more reasonable. We have no choice but to abolish it and very little to lose — writes Daniel Hannan. telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/06/1…
People in NI call on the EU to show “pragmatism” or “flexibility” in interpreting the Protocol are spectacularly missing the point. Brussels has no interest in being reasonable. The protocol is the surest way to keep the UK from straying too far from its regulatory orbit.
Already, every trade deal we contract with a third country needs to be compatible with its terms. But they want to go further until we agree to follow all EU food and veterinary rules in perpetuity, thereby rendering an independent commercial policy far less viable.
Read 25 tweets
12 Jun
Sausage wars: Boris Johnson hints he may rip up EU rule book over trade with NI. PM's official spokesman says ‘all options are on the table’ when asked whether he would unilaterally waive checks on imports
telegraph.co.uk/politics/2021/…
PM warned on Friday night that he was willing to unilaterally breach the NIP to keep meat imports flowing ahead of talks with EU leaders on Saturday.
His official spokesman said "all options are on the table" if no agreement is reached by the end of this month.
PM will hold meetings with four EU leaders at the G7 summit in Cornwall on Saturday. He will meet Macron at around 8am, followed by Merkel and then a joint meeting with von der Leyen and Michel.
Read 5 tweets
11 Jun
Fully vaccinated people account for only 5% of delta variant infections. It(it is predominantly affecting unvaccinated people). The Delta death rate is also very low at 0.1%
telegraph.co.uk/news/2021/06/1…
Out of 33,206 Delta (Indian variant) cases sequenced since Feb 1:
- only 1,785 were people fully vaccinated
- only 62 fully vaccinated ended up in hospital
compared with 397 unvaccinated individuals. Image
Delta death rate still very low: 0.1% of infected die (but it may increase because of the lag cases>deaths). Alpha (Kent variant) death rate is 1.7%.
So far there have been just 42 deaths from the Delta, only 12 in fully vaccinated also suffering from "profound co-morbidities".
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(