This too. I increasingly think that much of China Twitter and Weibo’s hypernationalist corners deserve each other. Sometimes one can’t take sides because there are compelling arguments on both sides, at other times, it’s simply because both sides are so intellectually revolting.
E.g., thinking that social support for Meng is almost completely manufactured is every bit as stupid as thinking that it’s almost completely genuine. Reality is much more complicated. This should be obvious, and any side that can’t acknowledge it is intellectually worthless.
Just to basically illustrate: unless you willfully ignored everything that was going on on Chinese social media, there was no way a semi-rational observer could conclude that the initial explosion of joy at her return was completely manufactured. At the same time…
… Unless you willfully ignore the large amount of snark and sarcasm that began popping up on Chinese social media on day 2 (see attached screenshot), there was also no way a semi-rational observer could conclude that there was no significant social dissent, even disgust, on…
… the over-the-top reception she got in Shenzhen and on state media. By this afternoon, Weibo censors had begun to clean up these posts, which further makes it impossible to rationally believe that social support for her was not at least in part manufactured. And yet…
… I’m willing to bet that much of China Twitter will resolutely stick to the “it’s almost all manufactured” position, whereas Chinese hypernationalists will resolutely stick to the “it’s almost all genuine” position, despite both being obviously proven false in a single day. …
… Not all two-sided disagreements justify equal amounts of (severe) disdain towards both sides, but this one really does. At some point, you just get sick of all the bullshit.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
And I will say one final thing about the Meng episode, whatever the legal merits of getting her back, the insane pulling-out-all-the-stops reception the government is orchestrating to celebrate her return is shockingly grotesque, undignified even. They should have treated her…
… like any other Chinese citizen wrongfully attacked by American law enforcement (and there are plenty of those these days). Instead, we get this extravaganza that really rubs China’s harsh class hierarchies in its citizens’ faces. Very dumb move.
Either that, or they should do this for every Chinese scientist wrongfully targeted by the DOJ’s “China initiative” upon their return.
Everyone’s talking about how legality took a beating in the patently political Meng Wanzhou case, but it’s actually likely that, in fact, none of three countries obviously violated their own basic procedural legality: American prosecutorial discretion easily allows for…
… deals of this sort, the Canadian system didn’t engage in any legal irregularities whatsoever, whereas the Chinese court system did at least sentence the two Michaels to years in jail *plus* deportation, and can therefore claim that prioritizing the latter sentence…
… over the former is legally allowable. What the case shows, therefore, is not that procedural legality was discarded in favor or naked politics, but that naked politics can operate through procedural legality: legal systems are designed to allow and even facilitate politics…
Back in 2016, Trump’s election was only part of a globally wave of right wing populism and ethno-nationalism that seemed inexorably on the rise—the UK, France, Germany, Hungary, India, the Philippines, Brazil, etc. So, 4 years later, how has this populist wave been doing?
1. Well, it’s a mixed bag. Trump is gone now, of course, and right wing populism didn’t make nearly as much headway in Western Europe as people initially feared. That said, it has won major political victories in Eastern Europe, South and Southeast Asia, and Latin America...
2. What has been universally true is that nearly all right wing populists who have risen to power have proven highly inept at governance: Trump, BoJo, Modi, Bolsonaro, etc. Some of this is due to hostility from elites, but a larger cause is simply their own anti-intellectualism.
1. This bears repeating: as harmful as Trump has been politically, his administrative impact has been even worse. The US has always been a poorly governed country by developed nation standards—too much blind faith that capitalism can work itself out—but... nytimes.com/2021/01/18/opi…
2. ... the sheer volume of its innate economic endowments usually meant that it didn’t suffer much from that. Under Trump, however, I suppose Americans are finally experiencing the consequences of catastrophically inept governance, and at the worst time possible. It turns out...
3. ... that interstate problems, duh, really do require interstate action that only the federal government can provide, and therefore that having the federal government MIA in the middle of a pandemic is a recipe for disaster. Contrary to some of my colleagues, I’ve long felt...