Why vaccine passports are invalid.

This thread in response to query by @FaruquiNeha based on an article by @Craig_A_Spencer that essentially states vaccinated people are less likely to be infected.

While that statement is true, it doesn’t address the whole issue.👇

1/17
I will address the key question here with an example.

You are in a room with ten other people.

You want to know if it is safe; and whether any of them could pass the virus on to you.

The basic concept of vaccine passport is that such a person will not give you the virus.

2/
But in reality, we can no longer classify everything in binary terms (black or white)

According to the proponents of vaccine passport, only two kinds of people exist in the universe.

The vaccinated, and the unvaccinated.

Unfortunately, that is not the reality. 👇

3/
The room has not 2, but at least 10 categories of people.

1. Fully vaccinated, recent
2. Fully vaccinated, remote (more risk)
2. One past infection, recent
3. One dose vaccinated plus past infection
4. One dose vaccinated, but no past infection
5. Two (or 3) past infections

4/
6. No past infection, no vaccination, but extremely careful person.
7. Fully vaccinated but active socialite, not good at mask wearing
8. Past infection, very careful person
9. Unvaccinated, socialite, never wears masks
10. Person (any status) who keeps quiet, wears a mask

5/
These 10 (and more) categories of people each have different risks of:

1.bringing the virus into the room, and

2. Spreading it around in the room.

It is true that someone who had been fully vaccinated (recently, within 2 months) is very unlikely to be carrying the virus.

6/
In the first two months it is almost impossible to get infected, or to spread infection. But in real life, in a public place, how likely is it to encounter such a person?

Each of the ten categories of people I listed above have different risks for the two variables above.

7/
A person transmits most virus in the first 4 days, starting from the days prior to onset of symptoms when viral load is max.

Whether they are vaccinated or not, this viral load remains the same, among those who are infected.

8/
While it is shown that viral load drops in the last few days in the vaccinated, it doesn’t really matter because spread mainly occurs in the beginning, not the end.

And this occurs when the person least suspects to be infected, which is particularly true among the vaccinated.
9/
It is true that in those who had been fully vaccinated, the odds of infection are lower, but that also depends on:

1. How long it’s been since vaccination

2. What is the person’s overall social behaviour & compliance with pandemic precautions, (which we have no control of)

9/
Now let’s look at the other 8 categories.

Without elaborating on each, it is clear that each of these people are in varying shades of gray, and not in black or white categories.

Past infection protects against reinfection much the same way as vaccination, see below 👇

10/
Long thread, please see the whole thread for context. Also see above ☝️

11/
And then there are past infected people who have received one dose, or two doses. This is called hybrid immunity. That is also very good protection.

If we continue to divide people into textbook style black and white (good and bad) categories, we are being blind to science.

13/
Serosurveys have shown high prevalence of antibodies in populations, which indicate that a large number of people are already past-infected category.

This cannot be ignored any longer while discussing “vaccine passport”

14/
Unfortunately it is not easy to document past infections, as

1. half the cases were without symptoms, and

2. total antibody level drops off after 3 months.

(A small baseline level will remain which can’t be picked up by routine assays)

15/
In summary, we can’t look at the ten people in the room and classify them as “good or bad”, “safe or unsafe” - any longer.

It is definitely a good idea to vaccinate people because that is the most definitive and safe method of reducing the risk of severe disease and death.

16/
But that should not mean that those 9 other people should be thrown out of the room, simply because they “don’t fit” the black and white category of “vaccine passport”.

Some ideas are bad, and it is not worth hanging on to them.

We need to move on.

17/17

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Rajeev Jayadevan

Rajeev Jayadevan Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RajeevJayadevan

24 Sep
Predictions of the future are notoriously unreliable. Two contrasting opinions are seen here.

One is the simplistic view that the virus will evolve into a common cold virus, which is more of wishful thinking.

The other is that such a change will not occur.

Will explain below👇
Selection pressure is a term used in evolution.

It can be positive, which means those with advantageous mutations get selected over others, leading to an increase in its population. Example is delta variant in the case of SARS-CoV-2 virus.

Negative selection pressure is 👇

2/
Negative selection pressure also occurs in evolution, it is basically the force that gets rid of the “seconds” or “imperfect products” or those who have genetic changes that are deemed unfit for long term survival of the species.

3/
Read 10 tweets
19 Sep
Why have the US death rates not come down?

It is 9 months since vaccines were rolled out in the US.
61% have received at least 1 dose.
54% are fully vaccinated.

The ratio between cases and deaths should have increased by now.
(Fewer deaths per case = bigger ratio)

Thread 👇
One possibility is that there are still many people who are not vaccinated, and these figures represent infection & death among the unvaccinated subgroup.

And if the unvaccinated are predominantly over 65, it would mean more deaths. See NYT article👇

2/

nytimes.com/2021/06/21/us/…
The above article states that in 11 states, at least 20% of older adults have not received even one dose.

The most logical explanation for the above graph is the combination of factors (older age group + being unvaccinated) existing in a large number of people.

3/
Read 10 tweets
17 Sep
Past infection did not provide additional protection from breakthrough infections.

ICMR study on 614 healthcare workers, half of whom each got covishield & covaxin.

Breakthrough infection rate was 13% in those with & without past infection.

1/6

assets.researchsquare.com/files/rs-88876…
Breakthrough infection rate is not provided for type of vaccine. Only overall number is given (13%, 81/614)

Antibody levels are seen to drop with time as expected.

Peak antibody levels are lower & the decline faster for covaxin, but this does not imply lower protection.

2/
The reason why a lower antibody level does not mean lower protection is that there are multiple components in the immune system that provide protection. Not all of them are measurable.

Besides, the study does not provide data that lower antibody level led to more infections.

3/
Read 7 tweets
16 Sep
Multiple issues with the widely quoted NEJM Israel study on boosters

Long thread👇

1. Authors report a lofty reduction in infections & severe cases by a factor of 11.3 & 19.5 in the primary analysis, where rates are compared between boosted & non boosted groups.

But ...

1/
2. In secondary analysis, this factor is down to 5.4. Secondary analysis compares rates within the SAME group, by timeframe. This is more believable not only because comparison is within the same group, but also because we know higher antibody levels reduce infection rates.

2/
Note: secondary analysis is available ONLY for infections, not severe cases.

In other words, we do not yet know if this 5.4-fold reduction in ‘infection’ will translate to reduction in hospitalisation/death later.

3. No mention of number of people who were hospitalised.

3/
Read 12 tweets
13 Sep
Detailed graphical representation of the story of the US elementary school teacher who infected 12 of her masked students by reading aloud without mask.

Lessons:

1. Multiple factors have to be in place to prevent outbreaks

2. Aerosol spread infects people both near & far

1/ Image
3. Masks did not protect the children from getting infected.

4. The teacher was unvaccinated, and had attended social gatherings.

5. She developed mild “allergy” symptoms which she chose to ignore (this could happen to anyone: wisdom is easier in hindsight)

2/ Image
6. Children in the next classroom also got infected, showing how far aerosols can travel

7. This also shows physical spacing is of limited value (think cigarette smoke in a room, spacing doesn’t change how the smoke spreads or smells)

3/
Read 6 tweets
28 Aug
Natural infection provides greater protection than (Pfizer) vaccination

Large study from Israel compared 3 groups of people

1. Past infection
2. Pfizer-vaccinated individuals
3. Those who had both

Please see WHOLE thread👇

1/
Large cohort of 673,676 vaccinated, 62883 past infection, & 42,099 vacc + past infection. The groups were matched to exclude confounding.

They looked at remote & recent past infection separately. Those who were infected in 2021 had greater protection than 1 year ago.

2/
The vaccinated group had a 27-fold greater risk of SYMPTOMATIC breakthrough infection compared to natural infection. The risk was 13-fold for ALL breakthrough infections.

A single dose of vaccine further increased the level of protection for those who had past infection.

3/
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(