Thread by @TTBikeFit

“Don’t worry - just ignore the risk of crossing the minefield. What matters is what happens on the other side! You may even get a few months of benefit over there!”

It’s becoming painfully clear that there is in fact a minefield located just beyond dose 1. ->

To get to dose 1+x you must cross the minefield. Meaning you may be severely or mortally harmed on the way.

Now, we can argue how many mines are in the field and how likely you are to step on one.

But it is increasingly clear the minefield is real and it’s a threat. ->

And although Pfizer and Moderna ignored the minefield in their trials, we don’t get to in the real world.

Making it across the minefield seems to occur some weeks post dose 2. ->

So the risk calc must include your chance of hitting a mine on the way to d2.

The benefit calc must include your personal C19 risk level.

If there is negligible C19 danger, there is no benefit to crossing the minefield, only risk (e.g., kids)->

The pushers ignore the minefield.

Luckily we have top notch independent analysts who discovered it while wading knee deep through crap data.

The first one I saw spot this was @federicolois

Now we have several Israeli analysts and @profnfenton ->

And a great summary by Gato, who has been hot on the tail of this phenomenon for weeks. The silence from official channels as usual is deafening.

boriquagato.substack.com/p/all-cause-de…

As always, if you have hard data demonstrating that the minefield doesn’t exist, bring it on. Those of us on this side just want the truth. Post modernist half-truth assertions and bad analyses of worse data need not apply.

If there is nothing to hide this should be easy. 💡