I almost feel sorry for the feds that they have such weak defenders
Low-ranked law school "debunker" guy literally saying the Proud Boy informing the Feds of what was going on Jan 6 isn't an "informant" because the FBI now uses a different official term for informants
Low-ranked law school "debunker" guy literally saying the Proud Boy informing the Feds of what was going on Jan 6 isn't an "informant" because the FBI now uses a different official term for informants
https://twitter.com/shipwreckedcrew/status/1442519952754237444
The spirit of this joke critique similar to the army of fact-checkers who descended upon Revolver's original piece's use of the phrase "unindicted co-conspirator"
Of course all of this (flawed) legal nit-picking about specific term "unindicted co-conspirators" is completely beside the point
The real Q is whether any of the individuals referred to in the charging documents of 1/6 are unindicted as a result of prior relationship with feds
The real Q is whether any of the individuals referred to in the charging documents of 1/6 are unindicted as a result of prior relationship with feds
For the record- b/c i cant resist
The DOJ *itself* called Person 3 - who is still unindicted - "the third co-conspirator"
So this "unindicted" person is a "co-conspirator" but not an "unindicted co-conspirator"?
They cant even win their own smokescreen technicality points
The DOJ *itself* called Person 3 - who is still unindicted - "the third co-conspirator"
So this "unindicted" person is a "co-conspirator" but not an "unindicted co-conspirator"?
They cant even win their own smokescreen technicality points
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
