Two of the video clips are from stationary cameras where released clips begin and end with the suspect already in the middle of the frame.
One tape you released is of a stationary camera outside DNC Headquarters, which has the suspect directly in frame sitting on the park bench near where the pipe bomb was allegedly planted.
But the portion of the tape you released is only 30 seconds long, and it starts with him already in the middle of the frame.
You must know how many more minutes the suspect was at the alleged bomb site.
But you have withheld that information from the public.
In another clip, the suspect is loitering outside a home, appearing to be waiting for someone.
The FBI cuts the tape while he is still in the middle of the frame, before we even see what direction the suspect leaves the scene.
The suspect could have been waiting there for minutes, or even met up with another suspect for all we know, but we don’t know because the tape on the stationary camera suddenly cuts.
Let me again state the obvious: the FBI must be in possession of the full tapes of the pipe bomb suspect from these cameras, and knows far more than the public about potentially identifying details.
You have begged the publics help in identifying this pipe bomb suspect- with a $100,000 reward.
Why not release the full tapes if you are truly intending to leverage the public’s help?
How about a hard commitment, here today, to release these tapes to the public immediately?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Italy (G7 country) signed up for Belt and Road in 2019 then got bullied by NATO to back out because of NATO fear of massive Chinese footprint in 3rd largest economy in europe
NATO has been looking for a massive response to BRI for a long, long time, and it wasn't possible under Trump administration because the only commonality economically to make this happen is the electric energy transition
Secondly, Damon smuggles in a version of Strauss that Velkley explicitly and implicitly critiques in his work
Velkley is not defending Strauss the moralist at all.
According to the aporetic interpretation of Strauss rather than the more childish "moralist" account...
it is just as problematic to defend any one moral position over the other. Or, at least, the aporetic Strauss is not primarily concerned with morals in a sense that would give Damon's critique here real bite
Both the US and Israel have at the very least used "Islamofascism" (particularly Sunni variety) to advance geopolitical aims
-Imo Nick was a little bit too stuck in emphasizing differences between US policy and Israel when to critique latter
I am pro-Israel generally and specifically with respect to the Israel Palestine question (though American politics is disproportionately obsessed with this dispute)
But want to preface the following by saying that I admire @realchrisrufo tremendously as someone who is smart, a fighter, and in the arena doing a very important job with encouraging success so far
There's a lot of downside to slipping up on this question.
So I Monday morning quarterback with full awareness of the proper qualifications and complete respect for Rufo and his project.
3/x
With that being said, it is very sad that a foremost champion critic of critical race theory, which is in truth anti-white racial theory, doesn't feel comfortable saying ANYTHING positive about being white
That's the state of affairs we're in and it's not good