Come to think of it, I do seem to have gathered myself an illustrious set of blockings... Forgive the indulgent threadlet, nothing to take too seriously, just some harmless fun(?).
To be clear, I don't have an issue with blocking in general, though for taxpayer (me!) funded individuals who communicate as part of their work, maybe there's a line, especially since I've never been abusive or threatening to any of them. Factual, and definitely sarcastic, sure.
🤣 @fiddleBits donated to the FLCCC in honor of @hang_a_shore's constructive comment below, and now I have no choice: I have to follow through with a "donate and block" fundraiser. The people have spoken!
Holy shit, I just noticed the subtitle of this image. OK folks, we have to get to the bottom of the whole "variants emerged due to vaccine trials" claim. Has anyone chased this down, other than the original correlation GISAID images?
2. "Hospital admission and emergency care attendance risk for SARS-CoV-2 delta (B.1.617.2) compared with alpha (B.1.1.7) variants of concern: a cohort study" (h/t @JoomiKim1)
Watching @RWMaloneMD & @GVDBossche yesterday, I saw scientific process at work. Outspoken experts opposing the establishment, converging to concrete predictions. We'll soon know who's right and who's wrong.
First, I've noticed this convergence a bit more than 2 months ago, with a number of controversial experts brought together by @BretWeinstein on the DarkHorse podcast. Since then, their views have been inching closer.
Here's why this matters: Scientific consensus doesn't happen in weeks. This is the easiest way to know that the mainstream anti lab-leak consensus was false. Also, religious heretics tend to disagree with each other. Convergence lends credibility to their claim to seek truth.