2. "Hospital admission and emergency care attendance risk for SARS-CoV-2 delta (B.1.617.2) compared with alpha (B.1.1.7) variants of concern: a cohort study" (h/t @JoomiKim1)
3. I... also did a bit of a hidden thread based on digging we did with @Volishun, with a napkin calculation, based on UK data. Scroll up from the tweet below to see how the results were arrived at.
🤣 @fiddleBits donated to the FLCCC in honor of @hang_a_shore's constructive comment below, and now I have no choice: I have to follow through with a "donate and block" fundraiser. The people have spoken!
Holy shit, I just noticed the subtitle of this image. OK folks, we have to get to the bottom of the whole "variants emerged due to vaccine trials" claim. Has anyone chased this down, other than the original correlation GISAID images?
Come to think of it, I do seem to have gathered myself an illustrious set of blockings... Forgive the indulgent threadlet, nothing to take too seriously, just some harmless fun(?).
Watching @RWMaloneMD & @GVDBossche yesterday, I saw scientific process at work. Outspoken experts opposing the establishment, converging to concrete predictions. We'll soon know who's right and who's wrong.
First, I've noticed this convergence a bit more than 2 months ago, with a number of controversial experts brought together by @BretWeinstein on the DarkHorse podcast. Since then, their views have been inching closer.
Here's why this matters: Scientific consensus doesn't happen in weeks. This is the easiest way to know that the mainstream anti lab-leak consensus was false. Also, religious heretics tend to disagree with each other. Convergence lends credibility to their claim to seek truth.