The map gets an F in geography - it has many noncompact districts and splits a large number of counties.
The map gets an F in partisan fairness - it draws far too many Republican districts.
The map is marginal on competitiveness - only two district possibly in the competitive range and 19 districts with a Republican vote share between 60-70%. This suggests that line-drawers were trying to shore up Republican districts.
The map has new Democratic vote sinks in Austin/Travis County and has wildly distorted lines in Dallas/Ft. Worth.
The overall grade is F.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The map gets a C in Partisan Fairness - favoring the GOP, with an expected delegation of 9R/5D.
The map gets a C in Competitiveness - despite 0 competitive districts, our findings suggest D and R voters in GA are clustered - there is strong partisan sorting in the state.
Of the districts, there are two which come close to competitive, the 6th & 2nd. The 6th contains Atlanta suburbs, including sections of Fulton and Forsyth Counties. The 2nd, a large southwest district, contains Columbus and Albany.
We'd like to highlight some of the individual winners who participated in the Great American Map-Off. Today we'll focus on the first place winner, and winner of the grand prize, Nathaniel Fischer of Boone, North
Carolina. (1/6)
The task was to draw a 14-district North Carolina Congressional map that best preserves communities of interest. Nate's stated goal was to use "many layers of datasets to skillfully craft districts that a native North Carolinian would be excited about." (2/6)