If you're going to ask people to have in-depth discussions with you on twitter, it helps to make sure you know how to have in-depth discussions on twitter.
Saying "I disagree" is not a discussion. Wondering out loud in my mentions is not a discussion. Telling me what you think when I didn't ask you is not a discussion. Yes, I could give you a lot of grace and assume some things about what you wanna talk about. But I could also not.
I give the same advice all the time, but people don't seem to understand it. Ask a question. Ask an actual question that is well-formed and gets at what you want me to talk to you about. If you can't do that easily, consider that you may not be ready to "discuss" anything.
Doing long threads on twitter is akin to "lecture" style in some ways. I also acknowledge that I often take on the tone and rhetoric of a lecturer. But I think that causes people to assume I want to lecture for them individually just because they're curious.
I often get asked "can you explain or elaborate further?" I don't mind this actually. But you have to help me understand what you're focusing on. Because yes, I can elaborate on a great many things. Most topics go as deep as you want them to go.
This may sound surprising to some people considering how much I talk shit on here. But I enjoy actual discussions more than lecturing. I don't like being asked to lecture on demand. And I don't like being asked to follow people's random brain wanderings.
Again, I'm not saying your random thoughts are bad. I enjoy talking about things that might help inform people's thoughts. I'm only saying please spend a little time organizing them if you are asking to engage with another person.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Wow. This is a great example of a thread that starts off good and then veers into selling you on some bullshit. It’s pretty seamless. It’s literally the transition from this first sentence to the second one.
This IS how twitter works folks. There is a feature that allows you to remove individuals before you reply. It allows you to respond to reasonable requests to be left alone rather than being a giant asshole and trying to blame it on technology.
This is what the feature looks like. First you hit reply. Then you click on the list of @ mentions. You'll get a list of people. Uncheck them and they will not be included in your reply. Is this clear @BryanFinster?
Right. We already knew this guy being an asshole had nothing to do with twitter. That's just the first excuse shitheads like this try to use.
If you had a business that made 10 million dollars every single year, and every single cent went to you without taxes or overhead. It would still take you 100 years to make a billion dollars. You would pass away before you "earned" it.
I keep talking about how we are connected. One person can only make a billion dollars if millions of other people are not. You can only make that kind of money by siphoning it off the backs of 100s of millions of people. The number of possible billionaires is extremely finite.
You can't actually spend 10 million dollars a year on yourself. I promise you. You can ball out for a couple of years. Make a few really big extravagant purchases. Then you pretty much have everything you need.
I know it's dangerous to criticize Rhianna on here. But this is a good example of how rich people rationalize to themselves how people feel about their wealth. This is exactly the wrong conclusion to draw.
Ooh man. Spelled her name wrong too. The stans about to come get me. 😂
Me and @operaqueenie were talking again last night. Trying to fathom how much a billion dollars is. I still say that humans can't actually wrap their heads around that much money. You can't even approach it. It's little more than a safety blanket. A status symbol.
This is a good message. It makes sense. It’s even relatively persuasive. Unless you have a different mental model. One that says the hospital’s job is to magically serve every individual whenever they need care, and you don’t actually have to know the details of how that happens.
If you have a different mental model that doesn’t include at least some understanding of hospital capacity, then this message may not mean anything to you. It’s not persuasive. It could go by and have no impact on your thinking at all.
Some people won’t update their mental model until they actually go the hospital and can’t get treated. That’s the only way it will become real to them. So there needs to be a different message that might also reach those people. We need lots of messages to reach lots of people.
I feel like I need to try again to make an important distinction here. Humans are terrible at "remembering" things. That's not how it works. When we "learn", what we do is incorporate new information into how we understand the world. After we do that, we don't have to "remember".
Education is not about remembering facts. It's about building stronger and stronger mental models about why the world works the way it does. And we take those mental models into everything we do so that we can make better decisions about the world around us.
I'm thinking about this right now because I had an important epiphany earlier. I think the right-wing culture war is absolutely about reducing "education" back down to "facts". They want to control people's mental models. Because that's how you manipulate people.