This is so disappointing. I am so angry. Obviously a stitch up between the leadership & the Unions apparachiks so the leadership can pretend to have clean hands. Old stalinist tactics.
theguardian.com/politics/2021/…
Now those who believe in injecting a dose of PR in our dying political system have only one option: desert Labour, vote Green or Liberal Democrats
The contempt shown for CLPs, for young people disaffected by politics, for all voters disenfranchised in constituencies where our awful voting system ensure the same party always win, is revolting. There is only one winner tonight: the Conservative party. One loser: democracy
This fossilised Labour doesn't deserve to win. Resign, tear up your card, join another party or not. But above all do not vote for those bastards. This is the only thing they will understand. This is the only power you have but it is a great power.#PR #Labour4PR

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Mafevema #CommonGround

Mafevema #CommonGround Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mafevema

29 Sep
The cynicism of the Labour Party's strategy: putting the party before the country. A 🧵
1. Why does Labour reject any Alliance with other parties? Apparently it makes no sense: to win a majority of 1 seat pre- boundary reform,Labour needs 124 extra seats. Even in Blair's time
when Labour was running at 50% in the polls against Major, it didn't achieve this. The apparachiks are not stupid. They know they can't win a majority alone. So why?
2. An Alliance would benefit the Greens (maybe from 1 to 8-10 seats & LD (maybe from 9 to 40ish). It would also 2/
be conditional on introducing a form of PR (AMS?) in the system which would anchor the small parties in the political landscape as potential king's makers. This isn't necessarily what would happen if either the Tories or Labour were popular enough to achieve majority on their 3/
Read 12 tweets
28 Sep
Give it a few years, a fall of sterling, a rise of interest rates and it will be the IMF again.
UK fuel crisis sparks drop in sterling over slowdown worries - on.ft.com/3ATX3Y3 via @FT
"Gas prices have surged across Europe, but Halpenny said sterling was bearing the brunt of inflationary fears in part because Brexit-induced labour shortages were exacerbating problems in the UK."
Here we are: the UK problems are seen as structural because of Brexit. Inflation is a given as prices are going up.
Read 5 tweets
28 Sep
Interesting thread by Paul Mason. But...
To win power Labour needs at the very least some form of pre-GE pact with the LD. Without this, the very best case scenario imv is a hung Parliament & Labour+LD (even adding a few Green seats) are unlikely to be enough
for a majority in HoC. Post GE, LD's price to cooperation will be PR.But Labour will insist on a referendum as it won't have PR in its manifesto (at best a vague comittment to a review as an olive branch to members'anger). A referendum will take a long time to set up
Read 13 tweets
27 Sep
"For it’s vital to recall that, despite claims to the contrary from some Brexiters since,Brexit was not sold to leave voters in terms of ‘sovereignty’ at any cost. They were promised that, at the very least, it had no costs and that, actually, it would mean lower prices,
better public services, more trade, and more prosperity. There would be no crisis to be ‘survived’. And this is not some long-gone history – it was only a shade over the normal length of a government’s term in office.
ormal length of a government’s term in office. So although neither hard core Brexiters nor their hard core followers amongst leave voters will ever have a change of heart, whatever happens, it needs only a fairly small number of leave voters to recognize the grotesque
Read 4 tweets
26 Sep
Excellent piece by John Harris. The main issue with our politicians is their mediocrity & lack of experience of good strategic planning except in the basic sense of party politics. They all appear to be completely out of their depth without any coherent

theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
vision for the country nor any ideas about implementation. This applies to Labour as much as to the Tories, not to speak of the LD & Greens. Parties should embark on a massive recruitment drive of people who actually know their stuff but the issue is that politics are so debased
that they ceased to attract talented experienced people. Plus they are not wanted by the politicians who fear their incompetence being exposed (as shown by Johnson's sacking his most talented MPs - the competent Gauke &
Read 5 tweets
25 Sep
In Co2 shortage: "Open a can of pop if you said Northern Ireland& treat yourself to another if you knew the reason why: because Northern Ireland remains part of the single market for goods, which means its bottling plants could get their carbon dioxide supplies from the EU.
The rest of the UK had no such luck, with the government forced to pay an undisclosed but doubtless hefty chunk of our money to a US company to keep two CO2 plants open, because … Brexit
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal Become our Patreon

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(