A 🧵 for non-scientists on vax & boosters, using data from @KCPubHealth.
Seattle shows us "case relative risk", comparing unvax'd vs vax'd, over time (bit.ly/3ESvUqV).
Think of this as "level of vax protection".
Since late July, it's been stable, even going up.
Think of this number as "how many times more protected you are vs COVID if vax'd vs unvax'd."
There are 2 factors likely to affect this. 1. How long since your last shot (waning) 2. Level of exposure in the community (when exposure is intense, vax may not prevent all infections)
From mid-April to mid-May, "protection level" went up because:
1. People were getting their 2nd shots (upper right, dark bars = 2nd doses given). 2. Exposure levels were going down.
By May 16, vax'd folks were 20x more protected from getting COVID than unvax'd, on average.
A visual representation of what we know and don't know about waning immunity.
We know, at 6-8 months:
- Partial vax not great.
- Full vax ~70-85% effective (better vs severe disease than infection).
- Booster gives short-term bump.
We don't know what happens next.
4 scenarios:
Scenario A: Booster gives long-term benefit (by increasing immune memory), and immunity to 2-dose series continues to wane.
In this scenario, boosters are the right thing to do, now.
Scenario B: Booster doesn't improve immune memory, so the added effect of booster is short-lived.
This is the worst-case, and in my mind least likely - because vax has been effective, w/o booster, for 8 months now.
Here, booster helps a bit, but we need revised vax.
1b. This makes sense, because:
(a) in the US, people 65+ have the lowest case rates
(b) most of those cases are in not-fully-vax'd
(c) fully vax'd recover faster
(d) people 65+ have fewer contacts
Bottom line: to halt transmission, fully vax'd seniors would be lowest priority.
@NEJM joining the waning immunity debate. I'm going to push back a bit.
Data from @UCSDHealth of vax effectiveness in health workers: 94% in June, 65% in July. Interpreted as "likely to be due to...delta and waning immunity over time, compounded by end of masking requirements."
1. re: delta. ~50% of CA sequences were delta in June. So if delta were the driving factor, we would expect to see some waning of vax effect in June (~halfway between May & July) - which we don't.
2. Same thing with waning immunity. According to the paper, vaccination started in mid-Dec, and it took 3 months to get 76% of workers vax'd. Why then would we see no waning of effect in May or June - and then a sudden drop of 30% in July?