@PostDisclosure 1-The potential problem with your position is that perhaps you define "a dogma" as having no relative usefulness for ascertaining truth.
An individual doesn't usually know where the dogma originated nor on what basis.
@PostDisclosure 2-It could have been derived from:
--A previous fact-finding mission on a given phenomenon,
--Someone knowledgeable from beyond the "global horizon of knowledge",
--Previous experiences with a given phenomenon.
etc etc etc
@PostDisclosure 3-Some Dogma maybe be:
--Poorly informed by opinions
--Delivered to our doorsteps by knowledgeable Entities from beyond the "Global Horizon of knowledge"
--Raw data and historical encounters.
Assessing the origin of the dogma in question might be a logical approach.
@PostDisclosure 4-For example,
In the time of the conquistadors coming to the New World across a vast ocean expanse. The New world natives have never crossed this horizon. They wouldn't know of the eastern blocks of human civilization.
@PostDisclosure 5-In this example,
Some occupants could step off a UFO from an even more removed "Global Horizon of knowledge" and involve themselves in this situation by telling the natives of this danger.
(actually, I believe this indeed did happen in real life)
@PostDisclosure 6-The occupants could inform the natives of everything they needed to know. Some of the natives could take it to heart 40 years before the invasion and create a dogmatic belief about foreign men from beyond "The Global Horizon".
They would be dogmatic.
@PostDisclosure 7-The dogmatic natives might systemically believe the warning from their "gods" and keep it firmly in mind. Teaching their children of the troubles caused by the Men from beyond the Horizon. The invaders.
There might be elements of other natives who discard such warnings.
@PostDisclosure 8-Saying to themselves and to others who are of the same mindset, that these "dogmatic beliefs" are pointless and useless or not factually grounded.
They might there "think differently".
40 years later, the men in vessels arrive. They claim to be from another land beyond.
@PostDisclosure 9-The individuals who are dogmatic chase them away. But the ones who don't believe in dogma, say to themselves "Let us invite them".
They do so, they are treated well by the men from beyond the edge of the world. The men want this common gold metal and they are happy to trade.
@PostDisclosure 10-Everything is good, the dogmatic hypothesis is downplayed. The men move from their vessels into the land. Then there are more vessels from beyond the horizon of the world.
You know how that story ended...
@PostDisclosure 11-The real problem you have is perhaps not the "dogma" itself.
--You lack the ability to verify.
--The ability to investigate "Beyond the Global Horizon".
--The ability to know what is and isn't a threat, and why it is labeled as such.
@PostDisclosure 12-So far the ET understands information warfare, propaganda and perception, and signature management.
--Are you sure you understand the human version of it?
--Are you able to spot it?
--What do you see in UFOlogy?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
@JustCur75ACIM@EdmondHWollmann@Deepfryguy76 1-In my opinion, the whole concept that ones experiences in this medium we call "physical reality" is somehow tied to our acceptance...to me that is totally false.
It's also easily disproved with the lightest of investigations and applied reasoning.
@JustCur75ACIM@EdmondHWollmann@Deepfryguy76 2-For example, if you create two people down in a physical medium. Two different people may decide on mutually conflicting scenarios.
I may want to build a house next to that ancient tree says person 1.
Person two says, no, let me cut it down and build on top of it.
In my mind, there is 0 doubt he's doing their bidding. He's doing it well and is well informed. I am actually surprised the Greer campaign is so thoroughly distrusting him.
@AbducteeJournal@Deepfryguy76@Blackgoo5@TomMontalk 2-I am deeply surprised that he's got such a bad reputation. I am actually glad he does. I guess the "ET" is tone-deaf with propaganda or maybe they just suck at their job in this instance. (?)
@AbducteeJournal@JeremyCorbell 1-The female ET advisor was my full-time warden...er, I mean caretaker. 😅So the males would come and go. When they left, eventually they used the walls. But they had a bad habit of walking on the roof until they got close and would gently fall through the spot in the roof nearby
@AbducteeJournal@JeremyCorbell 2-They each had a personal phasing field and wouldn't need the phasing light from the craft. (someones complaining I am being too detailed)
Usually, one of the males was left behind to keep watch over the craft. They communicated silently through PSI. I could hear most of it.
@AbducteeJournal@JeremyCorbell 3-Though with each other they talk without words, and at a very fast clip (I got used to it).
They could adjust their fields so they could be weightless inside their phasing field or near weightless.
Sometimes I would wake up and notice (ESP wise) the advisor floating in...
@BambrickWayne@Munook@TheUfoJoe Nah, it's just the "UT" doing their thing. They can clamp down on human people/civilizations just as easily.
People have a backward notion of how things really are and the various players at different levels.
You only need to correct small notions and people quickly get it.
@BambrickWayne@Munook@TheUfoJoe People from 350BC have the same misunderstandings as someone from 1200's, or the 1990's or 2021.
Correct the misunderstandings and things fall into place pretty easily. The lack of familiarity is where the confusion establishes itself.
@BambrickWayne@Munook@TheUfoJoe For example, people think the "UT" are spirits in the same sense as a "dead" person without a body.
That alone creates massive amounts of misunderstandings. Because the notion itself lends people to misunderstand what they think the UT entity is capable of.
One time as a child (11ish or so) I was playing around with a heavy shoulder-mounted 1980's camera. It was an old-style type without a recoding mechanism inside it
@Deepfryguy76@AbducteeJournal@Blackgoo5@TomMontalk 2-You had to hook it up to a TV, or a VCR to record video from it via RCA cables. Anyway, I was playing with it and noticed in the back of my mind that the Male ET kept moving behind me out of view of the camera.
So I suddenly turned around and pointed it at him and looked at...
@Deepfryguy76@AbducteeJournal@Blackgoo5@TomMontalk 3-He got flippant MAD. The camera turned off by itself and he started berating me about never pointing a camera at them. That I might capture a distortion of them.
I pointed out that I didn't have the VCR connected and the camera has no way to record.